Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've started using a 3" buffing machine to polish crystals (and also vintage fountain pens--my other hobby).  I just started but quite enjoy it.  The guy on Chronoglide recommended using dialux yellow to start removing scratches from crystals and then finishing up with red dialux.  My only issue with this is that the red compound is difficult to remove, more so from the fountain pens than the crystals.  Is there an alternative to the red dialux which is easier to remove after the polishing is completed.  Thank you.  Arron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, arron said:

thank you.  do those come in bar form or are they a powder/paste?  are you suggesting them as a substitute for both compounds i'm currently using or just the red compound.

The 0.5 diamond is a lapping paste, you can go finer than this to 0.25 micron. But different brands can vary in their grit size and not always accurate to how the compound is labelled. So choose a well known brand of quality, i generally just use the grading as a way of chooing a brands finest polishing grit. I find the paste easier applied by hand ( finger )with a piece of fine cloth  for crystal restoration. The polinum comes solid on a stick like the dilux compound so this can be used in the same way to charge your buffing wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alright... while I still hope for some answers, I'll continue my walk-through.  For now, just a quick post about the cleaning procedure. I did peg all the jewels and cleaned off dirt, oil etc with Rodico. Pivots cleaned with EVE pin polishers (only briefly to remove dirt). Then parts go in a couple of cleaning baskets (round brass ones) and inside of stainless tea filters... inside the Elma waterless cleaning (one 10min cycle) and rinsing liquids (two 10min cycles) in the ultrasonic.   After the cleaning, I put the parts in storage trays, cover them with a type of cellulose "paper" (that lets through the air, but protects from dust). And put that in the oven at 57°C (not too hot to avoid melting the shellac on the roller jewel).
    • Have you taken any out and had a look at them?
    • Your first few posts need approving, not sure of the number after that no approval needed. 
    • Yes, that's a good idea. Fault-finding (and maybe fixing) is the biggest skill. And actually quite fun.     hahahaha, 💯% 
    • The name on the dial is not listed in vol 1 or vol 2 of watch and clock makers of the world.  This dates around 1780 to 1910 looking at the spandrels because they do not have any cherubs. Spandrels are the four corner pieces on the dial. Also the dial is one piece very old ones the arch was attached to the main square. Also the makeup of the dial gives me the period of date. The trunk door is long and not short and wide which is another time scale. The case is very heavily decorated but crude, there are many differences between the left side to the right which indicates a country maker for the case certainly not a first class  cabinet  maker. The style of the hands also fit in to the time period as they are made of steel and not brass. I f I can be of any more help just ask. 
×
×
  • Create New...