Jump to content

Omega 861 Speedmaster stopping


Recommended Posts

Hi guys. 

Recently tackled a 861 Speedmaster mark 2 for a mate and it was running well. 

It came back shortly after a brief wear and I found that the chrono stops at 58 seconds after after 3-5 hours of running. 

I've adjusted the spring pressure on the minute runner lever. Have inspected and cleaned centre wheel, the minute counter finger is in good nick and springs back well. No rust there. 

 

What's next? Really sick of it as I've done all the other chronograph controls. I fitted a NOS chronograph driving wheel as old one was a bit worn and warped. 

 

Should I fit a new centre wheel? 

 

Cheers 

Alex 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stopping at just before 60 indicates something with the minute counter. The minute counter wheel needs to be absolutely free, and unlubricated; you should be able to nudge it forward or backward until a tooth just comes over the jumper tip and it should snap into place cleanly under the jumper tension. The jumper itself- clean, totally free, and the jumper spring should be nice and straight with the jumper removed.

 

The sliding gear should be set so that a tooth on its wheel points directly at the center of the chonograph runner. If it's off a little bit counter clockwise the finger on the runner can jam (though hard to happen on this caliber).

 

One thing I've encountered on this caliber is someone in the past screwed down the chronograph bridge without checking that the intermediate minute counter wheel has its pivot in its hole. That wheel is unjeweled; if you screw the bridge down in that condition (and don't break the pivot) it can make a divot in the bushing, sometimes slightly closing the hole. This can cause enough friction to to cause the minute counter wheel to not snap cleanly tooth to tooth with the jumper, or, even stop the watch with the chronograph running.

 

Have a look through, and try to post some clean close up pics of the chrono mechanism.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure you have considered this, but I had a similar situation with a non-chronometer watch (so maybe it's not applicable in this situation?), where it turned out (at least this was my conclusion) that the barrel arbor hole was too slack (and this could be seen upon closer inspection) and lead to the barrel binding up. At high wind the spring force could overcome this additional friction/binding but as the spring wound down it had less and less energy to overcome this problem and it eventually stopped. I fixed the slack in the plate and the error did not re-appear, so some circumstantial evidence at least that my working theory was correct. It's a relatively easy check and therefore easy to rule in or out - just remove the wind from the spring and see if the ratchet wheel can 'rock' back and forwards - I learned this from Kalle Slaap of Chronoglide who always does this as part of his initial disassembly checks. Anyhow, something to try and (hopefully) remove from the suspects list 🙂.

Just thinking it may also be worth re-checking all the jewels for cracks or chips, but this would require a full disassembly of course.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question; what's the amplitude of the watch with and without the chronograph engaged? It seems, according to your information, that it runs for 3-5 hrs and then it stops with the seconds recording hand just at 58seconds, just at the point whereby the running works experience an additional load.

In simple terms; are the running works powerful enough to drive the chronograph or is it running out of steam after 3-5 hrs and can't bear the additional load anymore when it has to drive the minutes-recording wheel at 58 seconds?

What's the amplitude when you disengage the chronograph after it has stopped running (3-5hrs) and what's the amplitude at that point, after you zeroed the chronograph, engage it again and measure the amplitude between the 0-58 seconds?

You can also visually observe the amplitude of the balance wheel at the moment when it has to drive the minutes-recording wheel.

Perhaps there is nothing "wrong" with the chronograph. Perhaps it's a combination of a "heavy" running chronograph, and a not strong enough running work, both in desperate need of a proper service?

Which leads back to JohnR725 question above plus; what was the complain / reason when/that you got it?

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
×
×
  • Create New...