Jump to content

Relation between mainspring thickness and height ?


Recommended Posts

Hello All;

I'm busy with a 1860'ish pocket-watch. The on the tail-end repaired mainspring (the original or a later replacement??) has a height of 3.44mm, a thickness of 0.2mm and a repaired length of about 430-440mm

The ID of the barrel is 16.8mm and the arbor diameter is 5.5mm.

If I use these measurements in the spring-calculator: https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/mainsprings.php , I get

157046614_Springcalculator.png.99c376974cf027737aeeb932c5f22b70.png

The problem arises when searching for a new spring (which has to be sourced from either CousinsUK or inside the EU).

A 3.44 mm height is not a common size and it's a very high spring for a pocket-watch. The closest 3.4mm high springs which I've seen had a thickness of 0.22mm, making the spring, with regards to its thickness, even stronger (too strong perhaps?)

If I were to go down in height, 3.2mm or even down to 3.0mm, more size options become available.

The spring calculator doesn't take the height of the spring into consideration, which perhaps seems a bit odd. I would expect that a 1.5mm high spring with a thickness of 0.2 is weaker than a 3.4mm high spring with the same 0.2mm thickness ?

So is there a relation in strength between the thickness of a spring and its height?

If I were to find 0.2mm thick spring with a height of say 3.2mm or even down to 3.0mm (which is about a 12% reduction in height compared to a 3.44mm spring), what are the consequences?

Would that spring be less strong and would the height reduction, considering its already "huge"-height, cause any problems?

Hope to hear your thoughts 😉

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

the height is of small influence to the momentum. It contributes directly,  while the thickness contributes with its cubic value! 

However a too low blade may wobble in  the barrel.

Many B-Uhren use H=3.5 mm. You will find them on Ebay(german) as Laco or Lange mainspring.

Frank

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, praezis said:

Many B-Uhren use H=3.5 mm.

Thanks 🙂

Not sure if 3.5mm would fit, could be slightly too high. And the 3.5mm springs I've seen started with a thickness of 0.22mm, but I will keep looking and indeed, the German eBay has a nice selection 😉

 

1 hour ago, praezis said:

However a too low blade may wobble in  the barrel.

That's were the rubber hits the road, how low is too low? Will 3.2mm still do or as a minimum a 3.0mm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the inner net height of your barrel. Normal with that size you will use inner height minus 0.1 mm, but minus 0.2 will do no harm.

The mentioned B-U springs have thickness 0.20

Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kalle Slaap said he is visiting London this week in order to see the exhibition. I was keeping an eye open, hoping to meet him.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds,England.  Ask away. 
    • What cutter are you using can you video the action 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 
    • if you're trying to keep track of conversations scattered all over the message board emails are an absolute must.   looking at the bell icon on the top of the page versus the emails today it looks like I got the correct amount of emails. So making some minor change based on the one of the images up above I started getting notifications again. But at times I still have a suspicion that something isn't quite right. I have some feeling that the message board may delay sending emails until something so seems to be a long delay between when you get your emails just a weird feeling things aren't quite right oh  and then even though I do seem to be getting emails I no longer get notifications of personal messages I don't find that out until I arrived at the message board where I'm pretty sure I used to get notifications of those two. So something is definitely changed on the message board. then for everyone not getting emails you do want to check your spam folder. I have found that sometimes were open up an email the system I use warns me that it thinks the email is evil and bad and I have no idea why he thinks some of the emails are and some are not. But this is actually the program I use not the email system which also has a mind of its own as to what it considers spam so you should always check your spam folder.
×
×
  • Create New...