Jump to content

Help with very minor service attempt question please


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I got given a watch about 35 years ago - I believe a relatively low cost mechanical watch. It's been working ok up till recently but has stopped keeping good time. I think it is jamming at points and a tap gets it moving again.

I'd love to give the watch to my kids in a working state. Where I live there are no watch repairers who will touch it, and I'm not at a stage where I can attempt a full teardown clean and rebuild either in terms of time, skill or tools 😀. Mostly lack of skill though. Just wanted to check - it is a single jewel watch. If I wanted to lubricate that jewel, would it just be a case of lifting cover in the circled area and putting a small drop of lubricant in?

Many thanks and sorry for the silly question.

 

Also any info on the movement would be interesting, I could not find much online.

 

Thanks,

Patrick 

PXL_20230331_112829739~2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2023 at 12:57 PM, paddy0d said:

Where I live there are no watch repairers who will touch it

did anyone explain why they didn't want to touch it?

On 4/11/2023 at 12:57 PM, paddy0d said:

I got given a watch about 35 years ago - I believe a relatively low cost mechanical watch. It's been working ok up till recently but has stopped keeping good time. I think it is jamming at points and a tap gets it moving again.

one of the problems with mechanical watches are they need to be serviced approximately every five years. If you go beyond this time span their lubrication will start disintegrate or basically no longer work properly. If you go long enough you will eventually wear the watch out. If you have a watch that has 0 J or perhaps one jewel then the amount of things that wear out greatly increase. So if you have a watch for 35 years it's basically worn out. Attempting a little fresh oil here and there isn't really going to solve the problem.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there- I'm sorry to hear you do not have a watchmaker in your area that will service your watch- I have the same problem...

...a little bit of information: the movement (mechanicals) in your watch are likely a variation of an Ebosa 86:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&a&2uswk&Ebosa_86 

Unfortunately as you suggest this is an inexpensive, lower quality of mechanical movement and yes, a quick drop of oil never helps. This type is not well suited to repair, which is probably why your local watch repair shops won't service it.

...students sometimes work on these types of movements because they are inexpensive, so it is possible a dismantling, cleaning and lubrication could have it running again. Perhaps there is a hobbyist local to you that might be willing?

Sorry it isn't better news...

Here's more:

https://17jewels.info/movements/e/ebosa/ebosa-86/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • The fact that the seconds runner starts running smoothly when you engage the chrono seconds makes me think the clutch is out of adjustment. That's a guess because I can't seem to find out too much about the chronograph module Breitling used on this model. On other Navitimers they used the Valjoux 7750 which had the running seconds on the left where the hand was mounted on an extended pivot on the fourth wheel. It looks to me that whatever pinion is driving that wheel is skipping teeth. Given that Breitling (et al) is not forthcoming with manuals or parts, I would send it back and ask for expedited service. They should be sufficiently embarrassed to do that for you at least.
    • Looks like someone forced in a screw that was bigger than the hole.  You would probably need to drill it out with a tungsten carbide rod sharpened at the tip to look like a spade drill. I'll see if I can find a video on how to make one. Start with a 0.5mm rod, then work your way up in 0.1mm increments until the walls of the hole weaken the screw enough to break it up.  This is a very time consuming, slow process. You'll need to centre the hole properly and not deviate. WD40 helps. The other option is to abandon the hole and use a dial dot. As much as I hate dial dots, this might be the safest option for a beginner.  Ok, found it.  
    • For those who are, curious I broke out the macro lens and took a few shots.  I'm attaching four of them: Image 1 is from the watchmaker's side and generally shows the problem area. Image 2 is a detail view of the offending dial foot hole (called out with the green circle), the tip of the offending screw (orange arrow) and the blue line indicates the approximate position of what's left of the head of the screw (determined by using an oiler as a feeler gauge to transfer that measurement to the visible portion of the plate.) Image 3 is looking down the screw hole you can see the head of the broken screw at the bottom. Image 4 is the same, but with less contrast to give a better appreciation of the condition of that end of the screw. I can almost convince myself that I can see the remains of the screw slot in the head, but I have to use alot of imagination in that exercise. Heard and understood.  There does appear to be a steel locating pin that can be seen in the lower, right center of Image 1 (right "above" the oval shaped slot that is to the left of where the pinion/clutch parts of the keyless works nestle into the plate.)  As I don't see a way to remove that I'd have to keep it out of the solution and have even contemplated dropping a little paraffin on it to give it a "rain coat" of sorts.  As I missed that before I did the closeup photos, I feel that I'm going to be looking at this plate in much greater detail to see if there anything else I might have missed. The screw assortments seem like a good acquisition.  The eBay seller who has the donor movements I was looking at never replied so I may just take a chance and get one of those as well a screw assortment.  They do seem like they'd be handy.  I have to confess that the idea of fabricating the needed screws appears to some deep part of my soul, I also have to confess that I do not yet have either the equipment, or the skill to use it.  Perhaps one day, but that day has not arrived (and I have alot of pricey bits and bobs that I will likely need to get along the way.) I thought about this, but the dial foot screw doesn't seem to be wide enough to get the thing out if I could advance it into the hole.  I suppose that I could try and take it out in pieces (advance it as far as it will go, get in there with some sort of saw, take a piece off, walk it forward again, take another piece, etc) but that seems like alot of risk to the main plate. I need to examine the other screw to ensure it doesn't have a shoulder or something that would prevent me from doing something like that.  However, all that said, I've been unable to get the thing to move at all. In general, this whole piece feels like someone had it before me, did a bad job of working on it and ultimately just bunged it all back together in a haphazard way and passed it on to be someone else's problem.
×
×
  • Create New...