Jump to content

Removal of second hand from Tissot watch


Recommended Posts

Hello, my name is Sean and I just joined today.   I have an anniversary watch from work that I wore for the first time last week.  After a couple days, I noticed the second hand was not attached to spindle (name ?).  I thought it would be best to remove it. I watched a couple videos and performed the following:

1.  Removed back plate. Two screws were rolling around inside.  See picture, I believe they came from the holes at 8:00 and 2:00 o’clock.

2.  I was able to remove time adjustment knob.

3. At this point I expected the whole inside part to fall out, but it didn’t.  The brass colored interior assembly rotates.

4.  There are two “fasteners” at 10:00 and 4:00 o’clock, but they look odd, when I zoom in on the picture.

I am stuck.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you very much.

Sean

 

 

06337E04-0BE5-4461-AB9D-3C0EEF13CEDC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it was an anniversary watch from your employer, could you not hand it back and say is this all you think of my loyal service, assuming you still work for them 😉 loose screws and a detached hand from new is not really acceptable is it.

As others have said its a front loader if you insist on a DIY repair, I would put the two loose screws back in before removing the front, that way the movement will stay in place and it will be easier to handle whilst trying to refit the second hand, assuming it can be refited and it's not fallen off because it's not possible to get a tight fit on it's pinion.

If its an option I would take it back for a replacement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As suggested by Paul, put the handsetting stem (knob) back and screw down the caseback. Hand it over to your boss nad ask for a repair / new one....

If you wanna do it yourself, check if you can remove the spacer aound the (brass) movement.

If it's not a spacer and is fixed at the case (I cannot see it cleary at your picture), than you have to remove the bezel or crystal from the front. You need special tools to do it. You'll  experiance that this is a costly hobby 😉

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you paul80, Hanspeter, and watchweasol for follow ups to lexacat comments.  I posted the pictures lexacat requested about 8 hours ago, but they have not been approved yet.   It was a 35 year anniversary watch,  I like my job, but this is par for the course with service gifts.  It’s ok, it gives me yet another thing  to complain about at work.  I would like to see if I can do this myself.  Sounds like there are some informational videos in the forums I can check.  I would like to at least learn the proper names for major components.

Thank you all,

Sean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird that the photos need approval, I wasn't aware that's a thing. Can you let us know the model number of the watch? It should be stamped on the caseback somewhere, otherwise let us know what details are written on the movement (can't quite read it in your original picture).

It's likely your watch has an acrylic crystal that can be removed with a crystal lift (they aren't super expensive), or the crystal is held in with a retaining ring. If there is an obvious ring demarking a separation of the front of the watch from the case, you should be able to remove the crystal with a simple case back opener by gently prising that ring up.

 

EDIT: wait, I see the pictures now, you can definitely use a case opener to separate the crystal retaining ring from the case.

You might need a case back press tool to fit it back on though. Those can be had for cheap on eBay or whatever if you only need it the once. 

Edited by lexacat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lexacat thank you very much.  I was able to get the crystal off then gently pry off the second hand (it pretty much fell off).  I pressed the crystal back on.  I am able to set time and date.  I attached a photo with the removed second hand.

Unfortunately, the watch no longer works.  I thought I put the battery back in correctly, but I will have to check and probably get a new battery.  Can’t help but think if I had not tried going in through the back, all would be well.

I really appreciate the time you took to help me through this.

Sean

16428C35-1AE4-42A5-AEC3-F37EA10F711B.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 12:59 AM, SPB said:

Hello, my name is Sean and I just joined today.   I have an anniversary watch from work that I wore for the first time last week.  After a couple days, I noticed the second hand was not attached to spindle (name ?).  I thought it would be best to remove it. I watched a couple videos and performed the following:

1.  Removed back plate. Two screws were rolling around inside.  See picture, I believe they came from the holes at 8:00 and 2:00 o’clock.

2.  I was able to remove time adjustment knob.

3. At this point I expected the whole inside part to fall out, but it didn’t.  The brass colored interior assembly rotates.

4.  There are two “fasteners” at 10:00 and 4:00 o’clock, but they look odd, when I zoom in on the picture.

I am stuck.  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you very much.

Sean

 

 

06337E04-0BE5-4461-AB9D-3C0EEF13CEDC.jpeg

I hate to say it but in your first pic which shows the movement there appears to be scratch mark running across the cover plate and the bottom end of the coil. If it is a scratch, and if it does go across the coil, the movement is probably dead. If this is the case then the most cost effective solution could well be a complete replacement movement.

The photo isn't that clear but it looks like it is an ETA movement but I can't discern the number. Can you get a clearer pic or tell us what the number is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi I increased the picture size and what Marc saw looks very much like a scratch and at the lower end of the coil there are two light marks which would indicate the case knife has clipped the coil and it’s now open circuit hence the reason it’s not working.  Better / clearer pictures of the logo and calibre needed for identification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed 
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...