Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just measured the ones in my Marshall/Moseley a couple days ago so I could tell a buddy what they were, and it mic'ed at a couple thou under 3/16" (specifically .184" to .185")
I assume it's to fit a .187" bore in the frame with some slip. You could lathe polish (emery or whatever) some 3/16 to fit a staking frame I'd think.

Edited by Vinito
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

The vast majority of staking tools use 4.7mm punches, including U.S. makes. 3/16" is 4.762mm, that extra 0.06mm is enough that it won't fit.

That explains something that's puzzled me.  I have an old Boley and Leinen - the stakes measure 4.67mm. But I have 2 which won't quite fit, they measure 4.73mm - annoying.

So, the Bergeon stakes, which are listed as 4.7mm - is that the diameter of the stake, or the size of the hole they fit ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

That explains something that's puzzled me.  I have an old Boley and Leinen - the stakes measure 4.67mm. But I have 2 which won't quite fit, they measure 4.73mm - annoying.

So, the Bergeon stakes, which are listed as 4.7mm - is that the diameter of the stake, or the size of the hole they fit ?

I just checked a handful of punches from my Star, they are all between 4.68mm to 4.70 spot on, mostly spot on. Some K&D punches I have measure exactly 4.70mm (well, a couple were 4.705mm).

I checked a couple of Star frames, a Favorite, and a Seitz (they did make staking tools too), with plug gages; the Stars and Seitz have 4.73mm holes, the Favorite has 4.72mm.

 

The modern staking tool was invented in the U.S. in the 1870s; they did like to use things like "Stubs steel wire gage" a lot back then. Stubs #12 is 0.185", or 4.699mm. I'm guessing they somewhat arbitrarily settled on Stubs #12 as the punch size. The stump locating end, that's another matter, being 4mm (except for some oddballs that are 4.5mm or 5mm).

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, praezis said:

The assumption that all sizes have to match the inch grid is a funny one (for the rest of the world at least) 🙂

Frank

As I understand it the punch diameter was originated in the U.S., which is pretty "inchy". Though in the watch industry it was a mix of inch and metric. It's just an odd diameter; why not 5mm? Thus the head scratching. Just as a lot of things in metric world stick to whole mms or some logical jumps, a lot of things in inch world stick to some fractional size. The 4.7 punch diameter does't fit a fractional size- but it does fit the Stubs steel wire gage, haha.

 

Now maybe I'm misinformed of the punch diameter origin (I read it in a 1910 book by K&D), but even if it was from mainland Europe, why such an odd size?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a bit maddening that they are so close but no cigar. When I was gathering up my first watchmaking tools I made what I thought was a great deal on a full set of old but unused stakes made by GF. But I may have found out why there weren't that many bidders when I unpacked them and realized they wouldn't fit the K&D staking tool that I had already bought, being one of the outlier sizes at ~4.77mm. Didn't fit the WestLake tool I had either, but that did give me an excuse to keep looking and later buy an incomplete GF set which was configured to allow use of the stakes as stumps in a reverso-type manner so it all worked out in the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose the .002" difference (.1875" to .185")would be frustrating if you just wanted and needed a working staking set to do the watch work and get on with it. One could either modify a pile of stakes to fit their staking frame or modify the bore of their tool to fit their stakes.

I am kinda warped though because I have a long history of making tools and tinkering in the machine shop, so I see even making stakes from scratch as kind of a fun challenge. My reflex is to wonder and wail at why anyone mechanically inclined doesn't feel the same way, but if I simply take a short step back to consider other perspectives, I totally get it. I have a problem thinking I have enough time to do all these projects in the brief amount of time we have in one life, and I have at least five lifetimes of projects queued up as it is. It's a problem, and I understand that when you guys just want the tool to do the job, you don't feel like constantly reinventing the wheel.

BUT, if my simply mentioning that it can be done prompts anyone to dive in for a try (if you have the time), maybe this post was worth making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not too hard to find 4.7mm tool steel here (in Switzerland at least), but in the U.S. I remember getting some 0.185" from MSC back in the day. They've gone to the birds, but I see McMaster Carr has it, $6.57 for a 3 foot length of O1 precision ground steel. O1 is a great steel for home shop toolmaking, and about perfect for staking punches. Starting with the right diameter, it's simple and fast to drill and shape the end for whatever use needed, and you only need to harden the very end, so that's simple and fast too.

 

I keep some 4.7 on hand just for making oddball punches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I recall a video on YT from Steffen Pahlow where he talks about getting himself a Chronometre (for which he paid more than he would have liked), but in his words "I had to. It is a Chronometre." I am wondering if you have more watch there than what you are aware of? Especially with what @Neverenoughwatches mentioned about two springs.
    • If you are having counter tops ( i think thats the amercan term ) and some cupboards underneath where you dont require working legroom then that corner doesn't have to be a difficult access void. Lazy susans , we ( kitchen fitters ) call them cabinet carousels or you could just have two adjacent doors with a corner post fixed to one of them, though it does make for a long reach to get to the very corner. But a carousel is a good access solution, also there are sliding steel baskets available but these are bloody expensive and typically problematic, i really think they are a crap idea. What i like about fully fitted worktops, very tidy looking, no loss of space, and sidewards pinged parts are hopefully going to stay worktop side and not end up crunched on the floor.
    • Aren't corners of rooms a bugger though as it is really difficult to use the space underneath the intersection of the two benchtops. Lazy Susans are an idea I suppose. Somewhere to be able to put tools/soldering iron/testing machines that aren't needed on the bench top all the time. It is a bit tight in there, but at least I won't have to move great distances to get to another area. I need to get hold of another chair to have at the cleaning bench. I'll stand all the time at the lathe and I already have the stool for the workbench. Need to get the power sorted now and move the LED lights for over the workbench. There are four downlight in the ceiling that are currently halogen bulbs. Really quite bright so that's good. Ceiling fan as well. What else could one hope for?
    • So all that glitters is not gold when it comes to buying from ebay ( in fact very very rarely) i bought this as554 a few months ago. It was it's dial that attracted me to the joblot, which turned out to be printed on a postcard, that was the first red flag. During disassembly many faults were discovered as listed above,  but i was prepared to soldier on and see what i could achieve. I managed to make a setting lever for it which was a great learning experience and also correctly shape and de rust the hairspring.  Turning my attention to the balance assembly i have hit a road block. The staff broke when removing the roller but that wasn't so much of an issue as it was quite deformed anyway.  I also had several AS554 staffs that I could replace it with, problem is they dont measure up the same. I thought i had identified the movement correctly but what i think has happened is some heavy modification has taken place to make an incorrect staff fit. A nos staff is a slack fit on the balance wheel, the roller and the collet. The balance wheel has also been filed to within an inch of its life. I'm starting to doubt my identification of the movement either that or someone has converted the movement into a pure nugget of trash. Bit disappointed as i managed to get the train to spin lovely and put a good few hours into the setting lever. A balance complete might be the only option if one is available but you know when you are just wasting money. My thoughts are to make and modify something else to fit and work if that is possible, any ideas anyone ? 
×
×
  • Create New...