Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It seems that an attempt to correct the poise was made in the past; if it was at the factory I would think it would be poised without a clear heavy spot, but if it was restaffed, and the staff was a bit undersize for the balance (could be from punching out the staff, or a poor replacement) that can introduce a large poise error as there's no assurance the staff rivets in perfectly centered. Perhaps someone tried to get it better and stopped before it was right.

 

If there's the slightest bend in a pivot that will show as a large poise error. Pivots should be cleaned in clean pithwood, and the ruby jaws of the poising tool likewise cleaned (the pith batons are nice for this). Tool should be level, and make sure the jaws are on the cylindrical part of the pivots, not the cones. I know that all sounds obvious but I've seen grads from watch school not check all the above...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Embarrassed to say...I don't remember.  I should have done all positions and wrote it down...that is the way I was taught in engineering school--don't rat me out!!

So we have no way to rule out any of the IFs Nikcelsilver listed, ie; poor restaffed, bent pivot , who knows could even   badly fitted roller table.

Just now, Nucejoe said:

So we have no way to rule out any of the IFs Nikcelsilver listed, ie; poor restaffed, bent pivot , who knows could even   badly fitted roller table.

Come to think of it ,  roller table wouldn't introduce much imbalance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I chucked it into a balloon chuck ti see if either pivot was problematic.  One of the pivots did seem to have an ever so slight bend at 30x magnification.  Maybe that is enough to cause the issue.

On the poising tool, using 10x magnification, I could detect a bent pivot effect.  I played around with counter weight using rodico and the balance performed much better. 

Will continue to study and report back.

2023-01-17 10_36_44-20230117_103007.jpg ‎- Photos.png

2023-01-17 10_36_58-20230117_102909.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're right Rich, throwing money at something that is practically worthless. I've had i happen a few times, its  disappointing, but a lesson learned in checking everything out before you put in too much effort. I'm still tempted to look through a load of balances and wheels i have to see whats doable with the genuine staffs, I'm thinking the  wheel that it came with is not genuine, it's had it weight completely hacked down. 
    • Ok thanks  it was just the brass cover next to the previous 3 keyless parts. Normally i wouldn't have expected that to be used to identify,  but I've searched American,  German and French part catalogs and coming up with nothing for the set lever,set spring and  yoke. I will have another look later today. There is another way but you would have to measure the stem very accurately. 
    • The diameter of the dial side is 40mm, and the other side 36,5mm. Here is another picture
    • The chronometer on the dial might just be a brand name, looking back yes i was mislead by the mention of Remontoir inside the case. Still not sure why it says Ancre Remontoir which translates to anchor winder, i imagine that means lever winder which still suggests to me 2 winding springs. I'm sure i have that same watch with chronometer on the dial ,I've never ventured inside it. My missus looks after 90% of my watches , so i will get hold of that one and have a look inside. Haha no not a remontoire, looks very basic.  Good to see the keyless works, can you measure the plate size to cut down on the search for them. Can you lay out that brass bridge cover as well please next to the other 3 pieces.
    • That's true. It is not a chronometer. As a matter of fact, I got it with another timepiece which is e real one, and only that (not a watch). I add a few pictures of my Chronometer / watch. no indication of a brand ...
×
×
  • Create New...