Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi all,

As the subject states, I'm having an odd problem with an ETA 12836 movement I just serviced. It runs steadily with an excellent trace on the timegraph, but with very low amplitude (175-190). It also doesn't appear to usually start running when the watch is wound; it takes a little shake or nudge of the balance wheel to get it going, but once it's going it runs consistently and smoothly.

I have disassembled the entire wheel train and re-cleaned them to be sure I didn't over-oil. I checked that the mainspring barrel was seated correctly. I removed the top balance jewels, soaked the entire balance in one-dip and reassembled with a fresh drop of oil, and the watch shows absolutely no improvement. I have also tried demagnetizing to no effect.

The movement and wheel train all seem to be in great shape as is the balance. When given a puff with an air blower the balance oscillates very freely, continuing to move down to a very small increment.

In the course of the service I replaced the mainspring with a brand new one from a reputable (I think?) dealer (watchmaterial.com). I greased the barrel wall in six places with 8217 before installing the mainspring.

I am really at a loss as to why the amplitude is so low. Is there something I'm overlooking here?

Thanks a lot!

EDIT: I should add that visually the balance runs true and snappy, but it does appear to have a very short arc.

PXL_20230114_002335621.jpg

Edited by cortman
Posted

A movement requiring a shake to start is an indication that the watch is very far out of beat.  Your timegrapher may not be giving you good information. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, dadistic said:

A movement requiring a shake to start is an indication that the watch is very far out of beat.  Your timegrapher may not be giving you good information. 

Oh that's a very good point that I hadn't even thought of. Makes a lot of sense. I'm going to play with that a bit and report back.

Posted
2 hours ago, dadistic said:

A movement requiring a shake to start is an indication that the watch is very far out of beat.  Your timegrapher may not be giving you good information. 

But looking at his timegrapher trace, his beat error is zero. Could be a dirty balance of pallet fork.

Posted

I assume that you did check the wheel train and balance wheel, so that they're all good, the train runs with almost no friction and the balance oscillates very freely. Timgrapher shows stable running means the escapement is ok. At this point I think the problem could be some where in the mainspring barrel. I once had a case that the watch runs at low amplitude because a previous watchmaker damaged the barrel lid putting it back in using tweezer. Basically the lid got bent inward and it was rubbing against the mainspring. I bent the lid back to flat and that solved the amplitude problem. You did replace the mainspring with a new one from a reputable dealer so the mainspring height should be right, but check for that as well.

Posted

How does the balance spin if you remove the escape wheel and give the balance a puff of air? The balance should be able to move the pallet fork from side to side without much resistance. However if the impulse jewel or the pallet fork horn is dirty you could lose a lot of amplitude there. I had an ETA 2472 with very low amplitude that was solved by properly cleaning the horn.

Posted

Does adding little power ( manually) to the barrel , give you GOOD  the amplitude?   If not lets see the lock of pallet on escape teeth. 

Regs

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Just closing the loop on this one- the mainspring slipped off the arbor, and in the process of re-shaping it to catch it broke- so I got an entirely new mainspring/arbor/barrel assembly (only a couple dollars more than just a mainspring, surprisingly) and after installation and reassembly, I'm getting 290 degrees right away. It appears the mainspring was probably not correct for this watch (boo, watchmaterial!).

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...