Jump to content

Watch loses minutes per day; timegrapher reads fine


Recommended Posts

Hi again forum!

I'm still working on the 16s Elgin Grade 211 Model 7 pocket watch. I formerly posted about this watch when I replaced the hairspring and it ran unnaturally fast while reading slow on a timegraph. I have since replaced the balance complete with a used but working balance from another movement.

I've run into a new conundrum: with the new balance the amplitude has improved to around 190-200- still low but as good as I'm expecting for this old watch. I've managed to regulate it to a fairly consistent +12-20 spd, with about 1.5 ms beat error. I've observed the watch running on the timegrapher for up to 15-20 minutes at a time with no significant deviation.

The problem is that the hands read slow- hours slow per day. No problem, I've fixed loose cannon pinion problems before. I tightened it up and it feels great when setting (it definitely was tell-tale loose before). However the watch continues to lose about two minutes per hour from observing it. The hands don't appear to get out of sync with each other, and it continues to read well on the timegrapher. The cannon pinion is tight- I re-tightened it to where it almost became too difficult to set, just as an experiment, and it continued to be slow. The hand itself doesn't appear to be loose on the pinion. The hour wheel and minute wheel both appear to be in excellent condition.

What else could be causing this issue? I'm really at a loss.  Thanks for any and all help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canon pinion was first thought, so you got that. Tooth count was my second thought; Woolshire got that one. How is the pallet fork engagement? What are the odds it's occasionally jumping teeth? How is the engagement and/or shape of other teeth? Maybe a wheel is skipping a tooth? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for the replies!

10 hours ago, Woolshire said:

Looks like you’ve addressed everything I would have thought of, except for possible wrong minute/hour wheels? Might want to count teeth and compare to known examples of Elgin model 7.

I will pull the bridge off this morning and count the teeth. I have a parts movement of the same type available, so I will compare to it.

 

9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose we can have a picture of theTiming machine results?

Out of curiosity are you running the movement in the case or out of the watch case?

I've attached a reading of the timing- I've watched it run both in and out of the case.

 

9 hours ago, Klassiker said:

What bpm is the new balance running at? What does a tooth-count tell you is the correct frequency?

The timegraph is saying 18000, which according to all documentation I can find online is the correct speed.

 

47 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Canon pinion was first thought, so you got that. Tooth count was my second thought; Woolshire got that one. How is the pallet fork engagement? What are the odds it's occasionally jumping teeth? How is the engagement and/or shape of other teeth? Maybe a wheel is skipping a tooth? 

That's an interesting thought. I didn't notice any damage to the escape wheel. The impulse pin on the pallet fork looked bent (laterally with the shaft of the fork) slightly, but I didn't know if it was intended to be that way. I'll compare to the parts movement pallet fork.

 

I'll check the teeth and the pallet fork and return back. Thanks again.

PXL_20221221_030744131.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I have some news! Thanks to all you who recommended counting teeth; coming from servicing pretty standard vintage wristwatches I would have never thought to bother with it, but sure enough one wheel has 5 more teeth than the comparable one from my parts movement. So I've swapped them out and am now timing it to see how it works. Thanks a lot you all, I really appreciate the help!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, cortman said:

I've watched it run both in and out of the case.

That's an interesting pattern on the timing machine?  have you demagnetized the watch? Patterns are always interesting on the timing machine this could be because it's magnetized or power transmission problem can do the same thing

5 hours ago, cortman said:

but sure enough one wheel has 5 more teeth than the comparable one from my parts movement. So I've swapped them out and am now timing it to see how it works.

Which wheel did you swap out and how many teeth did the bad one Have versus the good? If you have the right parts book like I have it actually lists all the gears how many teeth and I'm curious about what's going on here. So I really frown on when people start swapping parts on vintage watches as it doesn't always end well. Usually because wheels are specifically fit or made in batches and batches can vary a little bit.

This problem actually comes up a lot with wristwatches like Rolex. This is where you have a series of watches that have the base parts in the base parts have a frequency of 18,000 beats per hour but the other ones are different frequency. So eager people who want to sell a watch will mix-and-match components and then just sell the watch is running but not necessarily specify it doesn't keep time.

9 hours ago, cortman said:

I've watched it run both in and out of the case.

The reason I ask is that American pocket watches do not typically have stems. They rely on the case for the stem aspect so If the movement is out of the case it's in setting mode. Typically the watches have a way of putting the watch into a service mode which puts it back in the winding but that would assume that you understand that know how to do that. So yes the watch will run out of the case in setting mode but driving the hands will be an issue and could be a reason a watches running slow because you're driving all of this setting parts gear train that you shouldn't be.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aren't corners of rooms a bugger though as it is really difficult to use the space underneath the intersection of the two benchtops. Lazy Susans are an idea I suppose. Somewhere to be able to put tools/soldering iron/testing machines that aren't needed on the bench top all the time. It is a bit tight in there, but at least I won't have to move great distances to get to another area. I need to get hold of another chair to have at the cleaning bench. I'll stand all the time at the lathe and I already have the still for the workbench. Need to get the power sorted now and move the LED lights for over the workbench. There are four downlight in the ceiling that are currently halogen bulbs. Really quite bright so that's good. Ceiling fan as well. What else could one hope for?
    • So all that glitters is not gold when it comes to buying from ebay ( in fact very very rarely) i bought this as554 a few months ago. It was it's dial that attracted me to the joblot, which turned out to be printed on a postcard, that was the first red flag. During disassembly many faults were discovered as listed above,  but i was prepared to soldier on and see what i could achieve. I managed to make a setting lever for it which was a great learning experience and also correctly shape and de rust the hairspring.  Turning my attention to the balance assembly i have hit a road block. The staff broke when removing the roller but that wasn't so much of an issue as it was quite deformed anyway.  I also had several AS554 staffs that I could replace it with, problem is they dont measure up the same. I thought i had identified the movement correctly but what i think has happened is some heavy modification has taken place to make an incorrect staff fit. A nos staff is a slack fit on the balance wheel, the roller and the collet. The balance wheel has also been filed to within an inch of its life. I'm starting to doubt my identification of the movement either that or someone has converted the movement into a pure nugget of trash. Bit disappointed as i managed to get the train to spin lovely and put a good few hours into the setting lever. A balance complete might be the only option if one is available but you know when you are just wasting money. My thoughts are to make and modify something else to fit and work if that is possible, any ideas anyone ? 
    • My second iteration. Cleaning to be underneath the towel rails. That makes sense. Moved the fridge and the maching/printing table around to the right. Changed the lathe to be used over the end of the bench. Not much room in front of the 3D printer, but you don't have to stand there while it is doing its thing. I may swap the fridge and the machining/printing bench yet. Not sure. And the 'doing' area. The power that was brought in for tha spa was 30A I think, so there will be more power than I need. I will have to check how level the benches are as well as find a spot for the movement testing rig to go. The tiles do have a fall toward the drain so I will have to work something out to be able to level the rig easily no matter where I put it. I'm also going to cut some slots in the bottom for pendulum clearance and some squares in the top section to be able to better see the movement. I'm getting more excited now.
    • Thanks Rich and scott for that information,  so much more to learn.
×
×
  • Create New...