Jump to content

Help On New Chrono - Valjoux 7733?


Recommended Posts

I bought recently this Gigandet Chrono with an advertised Landeron 248 movement - only to look way too much as a Valjoux 7733.... the classic case of wrong name made from the seller... Anyway, the thing is, as I have no experience on Valjoux movements as of yet, I am quite in the dark in recognizing the proper model type, especially based from the seller blurry pictures...

 

This is the picture that came with the auction:

 

1_reduced.jpg

 

An educated guess is that it is a Valjoux 7733, but I am not really sure, since the model no. is not clearly visible from the picture. I will receive this movement in a couple of days, so the mystery will solve itself quickly. The problem I have, is that I want to restore this movement and put it inside a nice case. But as I said, I have no clue where to start with. Could someone of you experts point to a manual I can download?

 

Any help will be appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Geo. Can you confirm it is a Valjoux 7733 then? The dial, btw, says Gigandet... I coulnd't find much about Gigandet + Valjoux, honestly...

 

This is the dial looks:

 

3_reduced.jpg

 

I did find similar watches, but all have the 45 minute chronograph dial...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

And finally, after more than two weeks, due to a strike by the post workers, I got my movement, and I do confirm it is a Valjoux 7733. The condition is great, it started ticking after I gave the crown some turns, but there are some issues with it, obviously...

 

  1. I only have the chrono start pusher., The other pusher is missing
  2. The dial is in very good condition, apart from being a bit crooked and presenting a large crack at 8:30, which led to some staining of the dial
  3. The acrylic glass has some scratches, but nothing that can't be removed.
  4. The hands are misaligned a bit, that that is no real problem...
  5. I am missing now a proper case, but this I knew already :D

What I did notice, though, is that probably there is something wrong with the second pusher, apart the fact that it is missing, of course. There is only a small metallic spring where there should be a lever of some sorts... I am not acquainted with the Valjoux movement, so I need to study the manual first in order to be sure.

 

More to come...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I suspected, the Fly-Back Lever is missing, and it's screw broke inside te plate... I managed to take some pics, and to remove the screw. 

 

gigandet-3.jpg

 

As you can see, part of the screw is still inside, on.ly the head broke. I was still able to remove it safely...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so George, but I may be wrong. The Poljot 3133 is virtually the same, but not identical, although the part you require may be the same. The problem is Poljot 3133 parts are very hard to come by.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Geo,

 

Yes it is  indeed a good find, and I already placed the order and made the payment, but the shop only reopens on the 2nd of August. The shop looks weird, though, there are a lot of errors and the invoice I received is almost unreadable. Wish me luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Ross, yes i remember the broken arbor screw you had to deal with. Dont give up, if i can drill a tiny hole in a bloody hard barrel arbor without breaking the drill bit then you'll get that screw out one day somehow .
    • Isn't it most correct to say that the mixture of radium decay pathway compounds found in old lume will produce both alpha and beta particle radiation as well as gamma rays, so it's over-simplistic to dismiss it all as low-energy particle emission? True, a cheap geiger counter chirping away with a raw CPM count won't specifically give you the relevant biological dose, but it makes it easy to tell the difference between your local background, a watch with a bit of activity, and one that is comparatively quite active. Each person can make their own risk analysis based on their understanding and concern, but there's nothing wrong with using an inexpensive meter to help make the determination.
    • A lesson I learned last month on a Junghans pocket watch where both pins were bent over like stalks of wheat in the wind. I bent them back straight, wondering what a shock the thing must have taken to somehow bend even the outside pin over. And then the escapement wouldn't unlock at all. Probably the pallet stones are too long but I'm not ready for that repair yet so I bent the pins back over and it runs 0/0.2
    • Never. Brilliant work and photographs. Thank you. On my very first watch I knackered the arbour. I think the screw I put in was the crown screw. I didn't know about left handed screws then. Head sheared off. Thread broken just below surface. If I had the space, then a lathe would be my wished purchase. 2 1/2 years later and I still get the arbour out now and again and...... I can dream. It's a lovely pocket watch. Ah well. 
    • Hello Davis. This thread is interesting. Thought I'd add my twopenneth worth. A short while ago I had a similar problem to you. Not a broken banking pin, but I did alter a banking pin. Much to the consternation of members. Rightly so. However I did as they suggested and obtained a complete donor movement and installed it into the watch. The client, who I did not charge but did the work as a project for myself, was as happy as Larry.  Can you not look for watch of the same name? A Donor watch or movement.  Keep us posted on your result please.
×
×
  • Create New...