Jump to content

Omega Geneve Automatic, rare or not desirable? (166.0117 - cal. 1012)


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, hope you are doing good! 

To keep it short. I have this (in my opinion) nice-looking Omega Genève Automatic. Witch I like and wear every day. The crystal is quite worn off, so I thought I would fresh it up a or change it. Well, after I took it off, I realized that the glass is, as I think, not belonging to this model. So, I tried googling, but with no luck.  

Is it possible, someone might know what would be the right size, shape or part number? Should it be armored?

Or is this a fit and check kind of thing? Either you like it or not?  

Thank you in advance!  

msg639303616-44163.jpg

 

msg639303616-44165.jpg

Edited by swiss2k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Omega crystals usually have the omega logo on the inside surface, in the dead centre of the crystal. It is very tiny and feint and easily missed. Hold it up to a light and use a loupe to check.

If it has the omega logo, then it most probably is the original crystal.

Scratches can be buffed out quite easily. I like to use the new, foam type nail buffs. I use them to wet sand the scratches out. Start with the coarse one first. The crystal will go blur and frosted but that is normal. Then switch to the medium grit. The crystal will start to clear up and you can check if the deepest scratches have been buffed out. If not, go back to the coarse buff. Work your way up to the fine buff and check for scratches. You might have to do this several times to get most of the scratches out.

-388710906-1042591687.thumb.jpg.7898ed1b895eb9d5dc1c84c4eff9a72c.jpg

SG$ 1.75 | 1/2/3/4Pcs Nail Polisher Block Nail Buffer File Polishing Block Manicure Tools Buffs For Manicure Art Beauty Nail Polisher
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mraaWFm

I like to do a final polish with a table top polishing machine, fitted with a wool mop. But equally good results can be achieved with Polywatch crystal polish and polishing by hand.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hm. Mine is 1012 so pritty similar with 1020/1022, I think? 

Tension ring... to be honest I didn't find much proof as on the pictures I did see a lot of different crystals. But thank you for the info! 

s-l1600.jpg

So, PZ5200 is 31,62mm (316?) and 3,7mm high. 

In the Sternkreuz Gesamtkatalog G22, PZ5200 equivalent is XAC316.549 witch is 31,6mm and 2,5mm high.

One certain thing is that both have a tension ring. But did that model have that?

Edited by swiss2k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

If it has the omega logo, then it most probably is the original crystal.

I ordered an Omega crystal replacement from a well know material house in the UK and it was clearly stated on their site that it was not an original Omega crystal. Guess what, when it arrived it had a tiny Omega logo in the dead centre of the crystal only visible under strong magnification. I guess someone in the warehouse mistakenly picked it from the Omega box of crystals 😉 Anyway, I didn't mind and the crystal fitted perfectly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, swiss2k said:

Hello everyone, hope you are doing good! 

To keep it short. I have this (in my opinion) nice-looking Omega Genève Automatic. Witch I like and wear every day. The crystal is quite worn off, so I thought I would fresh it up a or change it. Well, after I took it off, I realized that the glass is, as I think, not belonging to this model. So, I tried googling, but with no luck.  

Is it possible, someone might know what would be the right size, shape or part number? Should it be armored?

Or is this a fit and check kind of thing? Either you like it or not?  

Thank you in advance!  

msg639303616-44163.jpg

 

msg639303616-44165.jpg

 Not sure what you are worried about 2k ? Its a nice little vintage watch.👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 Not sure what you are worried about 2k ? Its a nice little vintage watch.👍

Hello @Neverenoughwatches. Well I just joined the watch-collect/build thing, so basically I have not much experience at all. But from what I have noticed you can't find as much information as you can on other models. But I personally do really like them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, swiss2k said:

Hello @Neverenoughwatches. Well I just joined the watch-collect/build thing, so basically I have not much experience at all. But from what I have noticed you can't find as much information as you can on other models. But I personally do really like them. 

The Geneve, not as popular as the Seamaster of the same era, though i think there is a Seamaster Geneve also. Possibly on the same playing field as a Deville. The Geneve so named after the Geneva Observatory where Omega gained acclaim for very accurate chronometers. Some good history from Omega going back to the mids 1800s. Known very well among collectors for the Speedmaster Moonwatch, Bond watches, pioneers of the co axial escapement invented by our very famous English George Daniels. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you have a look under the ballance? Often the movement maker/number is hidden there.
    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
×
×
  • Create New...