Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Busy repairing and servicing a Nivada Compensamatic with the AS 1686 movement. All of the references I can find on the movement show a lyre shaped Incabloc spring for both top and bottom of the balance, including the very well documented Vulcain service on this site. This one is different.

 

The top spring looks very much like a KIF Trior, but the bottom mount is significantly smaller with what looks like a different spring. I've tried to get some detail on the attached images but was having to hand hold. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.

 

as1686.thumb.jpg.f8388886f4d1199fc3de4eb41d8ca2db.jpg1676259494_as16862.thumb.jpg.a2b2053f8c7720a33e6ddbf8f337673d.jpg

 

 

Edited by SpringMangler
test edit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very strange !  The following is from BestFit - at it says, the ones with 3 arms are the hardest to identify 😳

I can't see how you disassemble the top spring?  I had a similar spring in a FHF, but these were designed for money saving and not meant for disassembly. This is obviously a better quality movement - cap jewel on escape wheel.

image.png.c61b365f8fde20a371d3d4f7b5f47182.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, grsnovi said:

Look closely at the top image and you'll see there is in fact a cut out to allow the lifting of each of the three points.

Well spotted. I didn't se it in the shadow.

I've no idea what the lower shock is, or why it's so different to the top !

The AS 1686 is the same as the Standard 1686, and Bestfit lists many different shock jewels for this movement.

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input gents. I had spotted the small cutout on the top mounting so it looks like a modified piece of pegwood might do the trick.  Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

as1686 3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I have the benefit of working under a microscope. It really helps with this type of work.

It's something I have to seriously look into, pardon the pun, as I sometimes battle with a loupe and varifocals. I have tried just wearing reading specs with a loupe but then cannot see anything beyond the end of my arms. 

 

 

Edited by SpringMangler
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SpringMangler said:

It's something I have to seriously look into, pardon the pun, as I sometimes battle with a loupe and varifocals. I have tried just wearing reading specs with a loupe but then cannot see anything beyond the end of my arms. 

If you can, it's a game changer. I do everything under the microscope. I don't know how people can tweak hairsprings using a loupe - your head has to be where your tweezers need to be.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpringMangler said:

…Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

as1686 3.jpg

I personally would not try to disassemble this setting! Clean it as it is and oil through the jewel hole.

Edited by Kalanag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SpringMangler said:

Thanks for the input gents. I had spotted the small cutout on the top mounting so it looks like a modified piece of pegwood might do the trick.  Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

The spring shape is probably like the top, with arms that line up with the 3 slots when turned.

It will need to come apart for cleaning. Try turning it with some pegwood and see what happens !

Post a pic

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SpringMangler said:

Thanks for the input gents. I had spotted the small cutout on the top mounting so it looks like a modified piece of pegwood might do the trick.  Looking at the bottom spring there appears to be three notches as marked below, but these are hard to spot even through a loupe. Looks like it'll be hard to remove but is going to be extremely difficult to put back.

as1686 3.jpg

Yes mate. They are an absolute pain and so tiny.  The first one i did I lost twice trying to fit it with tweezers which is virtually impossible.  A recessed end of a toothpick did sort it though. Gauging the size to shape the toothpick took a little while. It needs to just fit the 3 spring arms to press them down and get them all started in the setting slots. Then you may have to ease them round with a couple of finely dressed oilers. Great fun 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

....  just fit the 3 spring arms to press them down and get them all started in the setting slots. Then you may have to ease them round with a couple of finely dressed oilers. Great fun 👍

Presumably you too need 3 arms to achieve this 😧

What poor design to make a part so difficult to fit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kalanag said:

I personally would not try to disassemble this setting! Clean it as it is and oil through the jewel hole.

Haha. Aw and miss so much fun.

14 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Presumably you too need 3 arms to achieve this 😧

What poor design to make a part so difficult to fit 

Haha. Yes mike if you try to do it with 3 seperate tools. My first attempts were with one pair of tweezers at the correct spacing to hit 2 of the arms and another pair to deal with the other arm. I was failing miserably for over half an hour with 2 temporary disappearances. Resided to making the wooden tool which took just 2 trys to install the spring. I do have the correct brass version of the tool now.  Yep i agree a poor design, common in small  70's Oris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice guys. I'll tackle the top one first and see how I get on. I was thinking of taking Kalanag's advice and attempting to clean and lubricate the bottom mounting in situ for now, whilst appreciating that it won't be thoroughly cleaned in the same way as removing. Think there was a similar discussion around some Seiko mountings recently.

Anyway, good job there's no swear jar nearby as I'd be skint by now.

Edited by SpringMangler
Can't spell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SpringMangler said:

Thanks for all the advice guys. I'll tackle the top one first and see how I get on. I was thinking of taking Kalanag's advice and attempting to clean and lubricate the bottom mounting in situ for now, whilst appreciating that it won't be thoroughly cleaned in the same way as removing. Think there was a similar discussion around some Seiko mountings recently.

Anyway, good job there's no swear jar nearby as I'd be skint by now.

Lol. Which is why i have permanently empty pockets 🙃 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I assume these are for the gear train as there's no shock protection ?

How do you clean them?

Right! It‘s made by Incabloc S.A. and used for the escape wheel of the JLC 889. You have to rely on the power of your cleaning machine and cleaning fluid. This could be one reason why watchmakers don‘t like the JLC 889 and its siblings so much 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same argument as the small Diashock - can they be cleaned properly without disassembly. I think that, as long as there isn't "baked on" crusty oil, using proper cleaning fluids in a heated ultrasonic will clean OK (?). Though I always disassemble  where possible. 

I'm surprised a company like JLC will use them on escape wheels. I looked on the Incabloc website but no info on cleaning.

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I finally got around to servicing this movement today. Since the original post I've acquired a stereo microscope which has made all of the difference and given me a lot more confidence.

I decided to get stuck into the balance jewels and they were surprisingly easy to remove, but very strange.

The shock spring, both top and bottom, is integrated into a type of chaton/jewel, so no separate spring. The bottom fitting is a two legged affair and the top one has three legs. The jewel that would normally sit against the spring in an Inca type setting sits directly on the pivot with the rounded side facing up against the flat face of the shock/chaton/jewel fitting. I did try putting flat face to flat face but it stopped the balance.

I would have taken photos but was too busy swearing trying to work out which part to oil and which way up each part went.

All back together now and running well. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2022 at 12:36 PM, Kalanag said:

I personally would not try to disassemble this setting! Clean it as it is and oil through the jewel hole.

So you just hope the jewels are in good shape?   

Is observing the freely turning balance test conclusive? 

Rgds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some watch manufaturer own their shock system which usually are made in- house. 

Brands  who buy movements from others , have choice of shock systems and order what they want, often to be or look distinguished. 

As far as I am concerned, any shock spring thats easy to unlock& re lock and doesn't fly is good.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am working on a eta 2970-1 and as soon as I screw down the rotor, the watch stops. The watch runs great without the automatic bridge, when I attach the automatic bridge, it continues to run well, but as soon as I attach the main rotor the watch stops. Can anyone please share schematics or pictures of the automatic bridge? I have looked up a few pictures online and it looks like I have assembled the bridge correctly after cleaning, but the fact that the watch stops as soon as the rotor puts counter pressure on the bridge, points me that there js something wrong with the automatic bridge. Thank you.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  This should help you.  704789946_TZIllustratedGlossary(2).pdf
    • I think you are right wish one of the two spring should make contact do you know what one?
    • So I was cleaning an especially dirty balance spring with B-dip because several turns were sticking together.  However, after a wash and dry, it seems there are more turns sticking due to the B-Dip.  I can see it clearly in-between the spring turns and it is not evaporating.  I even stretched the spring upwards a bit to let them air out and they continue to stick.  This is after two washes.  You can still see the liquid between the springs. Not sure if anyone has seen this, but I don't know if this is an indicator of my dip going bad or being contaminated.  I would rise with IPA, but the stud and collet aren't pinned--they are either glued or shellacked so I won't risk it.  If I keep seeing this, I'll probably switch back to a heptane or naphtha for this type of cleaning, but I wanted to see if anyone else has seen this with B-Dip. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...