Jump to content

WW Lathe tailstock drill modification--seems very clever


Recommended Posts

I got this book by Rod Lloyd about fixing Atmos clocks.  He has a separate section on clock repair in general.

He presents this idea of taking a piece of 8mm round stock that fits in a WW tailstock and using the headstock, drills a hole that will fit a PCB drill bit.  By drilling the hole with the headstock, perfect alignment is guaranteed.  Now the thing missing is, how do you secure the drill bit.  The implication is that each runner is a one off bit.  Maybe I am wrong.

Why not put a set screw into the runner (would have to be removed to remove the runner, of course)?

Anybody done this?

I have a collet holder that fists my tailstock runner, but is not so precise.

OK...it appears Mr Lloyd is wrong.  I measured all of my runners.  7.6mm  He says they are 8mm which is easy to find 8mm rods. Hmmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As noted in this thread, there's no standard between makes (and even within makes) for tailstock bores. Checking with my normal supplier here, they have 7.50mm and then 7.70mm, haha, McMaster in the states only has whole metric sizes and then in inch they get close with 02.969", which would be sloppy, or 0.302" which would require lapping off almost 0.003" and that's a lot more than it sounds.

 

Just a note on drilling "perfectly concentric" holes- it's much harder than it seems. You have to think in terms of percentage; if I center and drill an arbor for a 0.15mm pivot, and the drilling wanders off center 2 %, that's a total of 0.003mm, which is almost imperceptible under 10x magnification and wouldn't adversely affect anything unless it was some crazy tiny watch. At circuit board drill size, 1/8", that 2% would be over 6 hundredths of a mm, and that's starting to be a lot. In the precision machining world if you want a hole on-size and on-location there are a number of steps you can take, from using highly specialized drills in awesome machines (with speeds and feeds optimized etc.), or you would drill undersize, bore about 1 diameter deep to just  the next drill size, which would be maybe 0.10mm undersize of final, and then ream to final size. You can also bore to final size if wanted.

 

Sometimes the drill really does stay centered, and even drill on size, and even make a round hole, but if you're counting on it it usually doesn't, haha.

 

I have a drill chuck that pretty much stays in my collet holding tailstock. It's not perfect; under the scope I can see it almost always holds the drill slightly off, but when drilling (using the scope), I just nudge the chuck with my finger and regularly drill 0.10mm holes without issue. I keep the drill chuck as it's fast, and otherwise the tailstock doesn't reach far enough with the slide rest in place, which I use as much as humanly possible.

 

The fellow's idea isn't bad though. If you want to do it, you could find an easily available rod size like maybe 1/4", and make up some rings out of Delrin that fit the front and back of the tailstock bore, so the rod is a light sliding fit. As for a set screw, there won't be much material to thread, and if the bore in your rod is just a little loose the screw will skew the drill. You could make a clamp that's just a ring with a set screw; if the bore is close (easy to get a 1/8" reamer) it should clamp fine without splitting the end, but you could also run a slit down the middle of the rod along the bore, and the clamp will squeeze the two sides together on the drill.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

As noted in this thread, there's no standard between makes (and even within makes) for tailstock bores. Checking with my normal supplier here, they have 7.50mm and then 7.70mm, haha, McMaster in the states only has whole metric sizes and then in inch they get close with 02.969", which would be sloppy, or 0.302" which would require lapping off almost 0.003" and that's a lot more than it sounds.

 

Just a note on drilling "perfectly concentric" holes- it's much harder than it seems. You have to think in terms of percentage; if I center and drill an arbor for a 0.15mm pivot, and the drilling wanders off center 2 %, that's a total of 0.003mm, which is almost imperceptible under 10x magnification and wouldn't adversely affect anything unless it was some crazy tiny watch. At circuit board drill size, 1/8", that 2% would be over 6 hundredths of a mm, and that's starting to be a lot. In the precision machining world if you want a hole on-size and on-location there are a number of steps you can take, from using highly specialized drills in awesome machines (with speeds and feeds optimized etc.), or you would drill undersize, bore about 1 diameter deep to just  the next drill size, which would be maybe 0.10mm undersize of final, and then ream to final size. You can also bore to final size if wanted.

 

Sometimes the drill really does stay centered, and even drill on size, and even make a round hole, but if you're counting on it it usually doesn't, haha.

 

I have a drill chuck that pretty much stays in my collet holding tailstock. It's not perfect; under the scope I can see it almost always holds the drill slightly off, but when drilling (using the scope), I just nudge the chuck with my finger and regularly drill 0.10mm holes without issue. I keep the drill chuck as it's fast, and otherwise the tailstock doesn't reach far enough with the slide rest in place, which I use as much as humanly possible.

 

The fellow's idea isn't bad though. If you want to do it, you could find an easily available rod size like maybe 1/4", and make up some rings out of Delrin that fit the front and back of the tailstock bore, so the rod is a light sliding fit. As for a set screw, there won't be much material to thread, and if the bore in your rod is just a little loose the screw will skew the drill. You could make a clamp that's just a ring with a set screw; if the bore is close (easy to get a 1/8" reamer) it should clamp fine without splitting the end, but you could also run a slit down the middle of the rod along the bore, and the clamp with squeeze the two sides together on the drill.

Lots to chew on here. I did find some 7.6mm stock in China, so I ordered yesterday. I got enough to do experiments.

Your "finger nudge" method is the one I have used a few times. My tapered collet holder that fits in the runner is a little off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are issues with that method, not yet mentioned:

- after having bored the tailstock rod, you have to use it always in that same position (use a mark for alignment). With turning the rod, you will lose your center.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • does anyone knows what type of battery this digital Watch takes?
    • Hello good watch folk ,I  just fancied a light hearted discussion after my head was starting to spin over Epilame 😅. Specifically I'm meaning the sale of vintage watches, say nothing past the 1980s market. The stuff we see on ebay and other similar sites and found at carboots, curio shops etc. And are  we thinking its reaching a peak volume ?  Younger generations clearing out passed parents and grandparents possessions.  The younger folk are not as sentimental as the old fogies ( I'm now nearly at an age that i used to think was old fogie age ). When might it have started ?  i often wish i discovered the hobby much much sooner when selling your grandfathers pocket watch at a boot sale for a few quid was just a way to offload some tat. And when might it slow down. Thoughts anyone ?
    • Yes i did eventually realise that the oil will act as a barrier, I'm sure the discussion will continue. Ive had two oleophobic coffees ( added coconut ) and in the meantime i have this just delivered to take my mind off epilame for the time being. My favourite type of dial, its a beautiful looking watch traditional English made and it runs,  the ticktock is phenomenal,  i can hear it across my living room .  You wont believe how much it was. Thats interesting about synthetic oils , i thought the same, going from a 2 year service to 5 years is a big drop in income for service folk.  I expect some did well when they embraced the use of synthetic,  probably drawing in more customers than those that didn't use the new fangled substances , i bet fairly short lived though. The more frequent service makes more sense to me, not for just the service but for the regular check up inspections that might pick up impending faults. As far as epilame goes, wouldn't it be great to be able to fumigate the complete movement in a sealed jar of heated stearic acid, 🤔 now theres a thought 😅.
    • Imm going to close the discussion by attaching the photo of my super-titanium after several vicissitudes finally working. Purchased as not working I replaced the battery and for a stroke of luck I found its semi-new solar panel which, having verified its operation, seems to recharge the accumulator perfectly. I had taken this watch almost by bet, with 40 euros I brought it back to life. The initial half idea was to resell it to finance another purchase, but.. it's definitely a nice item. It would need to check the impermeability but it's a pleasure to see it on the wrist 😃
    • In fact the secret is to go gently and find the way without forcing, and the movement enters without problems
×
×
  • Create New...