Jump to content

Lume Rot on Seiko 7548 Hands - Best Option?


Recommended Posts

Greetings fellow horologists.

Would there be a lume doctor in the house? Hope everyone's keeping well. 

I've got this Seiko 7548-700B that, aside from a clean movement that's absolutely rust free, the hands seemed to have had a kickboxing bout with the mold monster and came out the loser. As you will see on the succeeding pictures, rot had crept in from the edges of the hands and worked its way towards the lume.

My intention for the watch is to restore it to its original glory with keeping all parts OEM as much as possible. The crystal will have to be replaced and the gaskets as well but my dilemma is what to do with the hands.

Options dancing around my head:

  • Remove original lume, clean and polish the hands and relume. It'll be weird because the markers won't light up while the hands will. 
  • Lightly scrape off molds. Then, dab with cotton swab (Q-tips) moist with household bleach in the hopes it will bleach the black gunk.
  • Just leave it alone and bask on its originality. The Seiko DNA remains intact.

What about you guys? What would you do?

A definite conundrum.

Thanks so much.

Jesse

 

IMG_6305.JPG

IMG_6379.JPG

IMG_6380.JPG

IMG_6386.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I shouldn't talk because I've been known to throw originality out the window in favour of looks. But it's one of those things where either you go all out or you leave it. Having pretty hands but tired lume on the dial and bezel pip will look worse in my opinion. and the thing is, bleaching might work on one dial but will ruin another - you can just never predict these things. Personally? I'd remove the old bits and keep them somewhere safe and replace with new parts. If you pass the watch on, the buyer can decide what he wants without you potentially ruining original parts.

EDIT: Just removing the lume on the hands and polishing them won't work out like you hope. The plating on the hands have been compromised, so you'll have to replate them as well. This from my own experience, YMMV

Edited by gbyleveldt
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, gbyleveldt said:

I guess I shouldn't talk because I've been known to throw originality out the window in favour of looks. But it's one of those things where either you go all out or you leave it. Having pretty hands but tired lume on the dial and bezel pip will look worse in my opinion. and the thing is, bleaching might work on one dial but will ruin another - you can just never predict these things. Personally? I'd remove the old bits and keep them somewhere safe and replace with new parts. If you pass the watch on, the buyer can decide what he wants without you potentially ruining original parts.

EDIT: Just removing the lume on the hands and polishing them won't work out like you hope. The plating on the hands have been compromised, so you'll have to replate them as well. This from my own experience, YMMV

Fair point. It does look like getting replacements, whether OEM or Aftermarket, is on the radar and I plan on changing the bezel as well but it has to be the pepsi bezel.

What I think will drive me crazy is the lume on the replacement hands that for sure will luminate in the dark whilst the rest of the hour markers will be dormant. Maybe I can remove the lumes on the new hands and just replace it with flat lume like material, plus I have to colour match it to the rest of the markers.

Thanks for your response. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/1/2022 at 1:44 PM, HouseofGeorge said:

My intention for the watch is to restore it to its original glory with keeping all parts OEM as much as possible. The crystal will have to be replaced and the gaskets as well but my dilemma is what to do with the hands.

If you want to "restore it to its original glory" and replace the bezel, I would replace the lume and paint the seconds hand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2022 at 1:47 AM, mikepilk said:

If you want to "restore it to its original glory" and replace the bezel, I would replace the lume and paint the seconds hand.

That's right. What about the hands though, how would you clean it? Just scrape off the gunk from the metal and remove the lume? It will have to be re-plated to a shiny silver/chrome finish. The seconds hand would be an easy paint with flat white and flat black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had similar looking hands on my 7548.  I removed the rotted lume and relumed them.  The silver plating on the hands is very thin and won's survive any polishing.  Some have used Magic Rhodium on the hands to bring back the silver.  This product seems to have disappeared from the US market.  You can't do anything to repair the pitting. 

I did just enough to remove the lume and corrosion.  The inside edges were gently cleaned as much as possible without disturbing the plating.  I have hands that look like they have been around the block but are perfectly readable day and night.  I work a lot at night and I need lume.  I make no apologies for have watches that are usable.  Acetone is the only solvent I've found that reliably removes Seiko lume. 

Some of the after market hands I have used lately have been junk.  They pressed on too easily and thina a tissue paper.  On one watch they have slipped out of place and need to be replaced.  I'll take worn looking Seiko hands over after market any day. 

The 7548 and 6309 hands are flat and have sharp edges.  Most reproductions have rounded edges and corners that just don't look right. 

On your bezel, you may find the little plastic circle pushed into the hole.  Having that little bit goes a long way to improving the look of the bezel. I use UV cure varnish as used on fishing flies to mix lume paste for these.  It waterproofs the lume powder and glues the pip in place. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued. They except to get stem in stock for cal. K916 but will that work? Or Is there a way out to join the ends?
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...