Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm working on a vintage Omega 620 for my wife which had a bad hairspring along with needing a new mainspring and a lower balance shock (incabloc) setting. I purchased a donor movement that had a good balance, and the setting I needed...the mainspring I simply purchased from CasKer.

The steel of the hairspring is the blue carbon steel and not the white steel that I've seen in every watch I took apart in my short time tinkering with watches. When did Omega stop using the blue carbon steel springs?   I don't want to put in a hairspring if its not the proper type steel.

 

The movement it came out of is from 1968.

Thanks

Posted

Hairspring's grade is what matters, I am not sure if the color indicates the grade. 

Traditionally hairsprings in Omega are high grade I think grade or No 1 , there are No2 up to five I believe.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

In 1968 Omega would have used a Nivarox spring and monometalic balance. Nivarox supplied springs either white or blue, in various grades as Joe mentioned, but still an alloy very different than carbon steel. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 hours ago, PostwarO27 said:

 I don't want to put in a hairspring if its not the proper type steel.

It's not like you really have a choice here? Hairsprings are usually not replaceable usually come with the balance wheel. Then as others have pointed out just because it's blue in color doesn't mean that it's steel.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Hairsprings are usually not replaceable usually come with the balance wheel.

That's what I did...I took the entire balance, cock and all from the donor movement along with the lower shock setting.  But when I saw the color of the steel, I'm no longer sure if the hairspring and balance wheel from the donor is the proper match.

If the monometallic metal that Joe mentioned did come in white and blue, I'm comfortable with that and will proceed with the rebuild to get it on a time-grapher.

 

 

Posted

@PostwarO27   If you are anything as terrible with dynamic poising as I am, then we can't tell a Chronograde oscilator apart from a regular one anyway. I go ahead and fix the watch with what you got, it'll run accurate. I mean you don't plan to send the piece in for COSC approval do you? 

 

2 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

@PostwarO27   If you are anything as terrible with dynamic poising as I am, then we can't tell a Chronograde oscilator apart from a regular one anyway. I go ahead and fix the watch with what you got, it'll run accurate. I mean you don't plan to send the piece in for COSC approval do you? 

 

Oh just noticed you scavanged the whole balance complete from the donor, its just adjusting for various positions then.

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...