Jump to content

Frankenstein movement?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

On the barrel bridge A60, on the train bridge 425, under the balance P356.

Microlist say the P is Peseux but ranfft doesn't list a 355. The movement does look like a  Phenix 355 though. 

Just so we're clear on the numbering schemes? A company selling you a watch will put their name on the dial. Oftentimes they put their name and/or number on the main plate in plain sight.

Then many times they purchase basically an OEM movement from another company. That other company will put their Markings usually under the balance wheel but not always. Then sometimes the purchasing company will remove that or modify the watch.

This means that you can end up with a lot of numbers on your watch that are all legitimate numbers. But possibly extremely unhelpful to figure out like if you're looking for parts because you need to figure out who action made the movement.

Then sites such as ranfft  Listing all those movements and that's only scratching the surface of the quantity of movements ever made.

This is where reference books like bestfit comes in handy. At one time the makers conveniently made all of the setting parts unique and if you have the right book you can look up the setting components in figure out what you have. So if you to watch with no markings at all and you knew the size you could go to the book and possibly figure out what you have. Or in this case we can use the book to verify what you have or have not.

Then if were really lucky we could get a parts list with pretty pictures like the PDF attached. I also have a link to a parts list we can look up which parts cross reference with what etc.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=PES_355

3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Phenix 355 though.

You'll also notice that I did include that in the images the setting parts don't match.

P.JPG

P page 142 setting parts identification.JPG

P3 55 other.JPG

P3 55.JPG

3180_Peseux 355,385.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Just so we're clear on the numbering schemes? A company selling you a watch will put their name on the dial. Oftentimes they put their name and/or number on the main plate in plain sight.

Then many times they purchase basically an OEM movement from another company. That other company will put their Markings usually under the balance wheel but not always. Then sometimes the purchasing company will remove that or modify the watch.

This means that you can end up with a lot of numbers on your watch that are all legitimate numbers. But possibly extremely unhelpful to figure out like if you're looking for parts because you need to figure out who action made the movement.

Then sites such as ranfft  Listing all those movements and that's only scratching the surface of the quantity of movements ever made.

This is where reference books like bestfit comes in handy. At one time the makers conveniently made all of the setting parts unique and if you have the right book you can look up the setting components in figure out what you have. So if you to watch with no markings at all and you knew the size you could go to the book and possibly figure out what you have. Or in this case we can use the book to verify what you have or have not.

Then if were really lucky we could get a parts list with pretty pictures like the PDF attached. I also have a link to a parts list we can look up which parts cross reference with what etc.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=PES_355

You'll also notice that I did include that in the images the setting parts don't match.

P.JPG

P page 142 setting parts identification.JPG

P3 55 other.JPG

P3 55.JPG

3180_Peseux 355,385.pdf 1.35 MB · 0 downloads

 

22 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  I haveattached the tech sheet for the peseux 355 so you can make a comparison with the balancs cock and plates not found on ton the phenix 355 yet.

3180_Peseux 355,385.pdf 1.39 MB · 0 downloads

It seems decent, bought as movement only £1.99 and running despite being filthy and clogged with fibres.  

What's your opinion on the movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi The movement looks all there and when cleaned up will run ok tech sheets come from the material suppliers and the manufacturers a lot of the SWATCH group material is dealers only and watermarked to prevent copying some can be found on cousins site esslingers and others its a matter of searching  if you cant find any on yor particular watch just post it up some one will have a reference.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • At the lowest magnification, I can just get all of a normal wristwatch size movement in field. For some things it's too much magnification, but the nice thing about the eyepieces is they only take seconds to swap in and out. I'm genuinely surprised I've never read about anyone else doing it, to be honest.
    • I've attached two photographs - the watch case looks like it needs the crown to extend into the case to pick up the stem if that makes sense
    • The K&D (Levin made the same style too, probably others as well) are a clever design and work well when you get used to them. The only issue is if you wind the spring so that the tongue goes in, there's a really good chance it slips futher and then comes out  the next slot, usually breaking off. Best to size it so you can fit it in the barrel with the tongue sticking out.
    • I guess that's me... I work with various pumps, motors, sensors, computers, PCBs, and lots of code and chemistry. Couldn't tell you much about life with a mechatronics degree, as I've never heard the term before. My degree is in Entrepreneurship, and I bootstrapped all the technical stuff (my superpower). On the face of it, it sounds like mechatronics is the better way to go between the two, but it seems hard to imagine a mech E degree without a lot of code and electronics these days...   Whatever happened with his CS project, btw?
    • Totally Andy's brilliant idea. I just started the thread.  For what my opinion is worth, the number should be quite low. That's the point of it. It's as much about the hunt as the act of servicing/repairing the watches. I don't have too much of an opinion on currency, but £ has a slight edge since that's what it started with. This is a global forum, so the majority of people will be converting values no matter what. I don't know if there are any currency traders here, but if there's any currency that's especially stable or some other attribute that would benefit the game, that could be amusing. Maybe one that's super volatile? Qualification is heavily influenced by what wacky things some currency is doing on a given day (though usually that means shrinkage). We could go for something super obscure like the Chilean Peso or something just for giggles (though it might make conversion difficult). A lot of currencies are indexed to the US$, which would ease some of the conversion friction for some people. Just spitballing. My vote in the poll would be for £ inflation adjusted to £4.04 ca. 2020. I'm ticking those boxes, but I'm not sure about the 6.99. Is that £, or another currency? Source?
×
×
  • Create New...