Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone,

The date quickset function recently stopped working on my Omega Seamaster cal.1022 and I had a question before buying the needed parts to repair my watch.

From what I can see on ebay the part 1010 1562 (Cam for date) as a plastic version and a metal version, could I install the metal version instead of the plastic one? Are they the same part and will my quickset function still work?

I also need 1020 1571 (Day star driver) but I think that this part is only available in plastic.

Thanks!

- Mic

274926744_3110982679167193_2566836787450226816_n.thumb.jpg.d627ec0ffbb57b737f6461e65cff280c.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael92 said:

The date quickset function recently stopped working on my Omega Seamaster cal.1022 and I had a question before buying the needed parts to repair my watch.

Actually the very first question should be finding out for sure what his broken or wrong.

 

1 hour ago, Michael92 said:

From what I can see on ebay the part 1010 1562 (Cam for date) as a plastic version and a metal version, could I install the metal version instead of the plastic one?

I think so, the plastic version is preferable because it protects from breakages when one tries to quick set date around midnight. The finger flexes back and then returns to normal. A much appreciated evolution by makers,  less warranty returns actually due to user error.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, jdm said:

I think so, the plastic version is preferable because it protects from breakages when one tries to quick set date around midnight. The finger flexes back and then returns to normal. A much appreciated evolution by makers,  less warranty returns actually due to user error.

While it seems very Logical and I would agree with that there is a minor problem? We really need access to Omega current documentation but that can be problematic. Cousins has a slightly newer parts list and sometimes somebody will handwrite notes on these So I have snipped out a image out of the PDF. Looks like logic flies out the window and metal is preferred? At least for one of the parts

The problem with the watch companies are they make revisions and then there can be revision documents but trying to get newer documentation especially out of Omega can be very not easy at all. Even if you have Swatch group access you might not have the right level of access and getting technical documentation then can be impossible. That means we get stuck working with older documentation. You might bill find a clue from the parts list below but they're probably still working with all documentation also may be perhaps

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=OME_1022

 

 

Omega part metal versus plastic.JPG

214_Omega1010,1011,1012,1020,1021,1022NEWS-1 cousins.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • interesting video nice to see the machine what it can do now I wonder what it costs and I'm sure it's not in my budget. Plus the video brought up questions but the website below answers the questions? What was bothering me was the size of his machine 4 mm because I thought it was bigger than that? But then it occurred to me that maybe they had variations it looks like four, seven and 10. With the seven and 10 being the best because way more tool positions in way more rotating tools. Although I bet you all the rotating tools are probably separate cost https://www.tornos.com/en/content/swissnano   Then as we been talking about Sherline. Just so that everyone's aware of this they have another division their industrial division where you can buy bits and pieces. I have a link below that shows that just in case you don't want to have the entire machine you just need bits and pieces. https://www.sherline.com/product-category/industrial-products-division/   Let's see what we can do with the concept I explained up above and bits and pieces. For one thing you can make a really tiny gear very tiny like perhaps you're going to make a watch. Then another version the center part is not separate it is all machined from one piece. Then fills gear cutting machines have gone through multiple of evolutions. A lot of it based on what he wanted to make like he was going to make a watch unfortunately eyesight issues have prevented that. Another reason why you should start projects like this much sooner when your eyesight is really good or perhaps start on watches first and then move the clocks then local we have from the industrial division? Looks like two separate motors and heads. Then it's hard to see but this entire thing is built on top of a much larger milling machine as a larger milling machine gave a very solid platform to build everything.   Then like everything else that had multiple generations are versions the indexing went through of course variations like above is one version and the one below was the last version. Now the version below I mentioned that previously and somewhere in the beginning to discussion and somebody else had one in their picture. As it is a really nice precision indexing. Then I wasn't sure if I had a the watch photos here is his unfinished watch. No he wasn't going to make a simple watch like none of his clocks were simply either what would be the challenge and that.    
    • Use a Portwest Howie lab coat. They are the biological type so they have tapped cuffs so you don't end up getting the loose cuffs of normal lab coats catching everything. 
    • Some of the Chinese tools ae great and can be purchased at a fraction of the price of Swiss ones, some are complete garbage and some I'm convinced are coming out the same factory as the branded ones.
    • I found this string about this problem. I've not gone through it all, but I believe it also mentions making a spring. If not in this string, the info is online.
    • No, I now realise it’s broken😥 ive looked for one online, but v. Expensive! im going to service as is, in the hope that  one turns up. Thank  you.
×
×
  • Create New...