Jump to content

Elgin pocket watch--cracked jewel, staff replacement, split roller...summary and question


Recommended Posts

Posted

I started to tag on to this thread, but decided that it was unique enough to go alone.  I will leave it to the webmaster to move if necessary.

Back story: friend of a friend sent this with instructions not to bother to fix it but give her some info about the watch.  Naturally, I cannot run from a repair, so I have embarked on service.
It is an Elgin  12s pocket watch Grade 384.  Before posting I wanted to get the jump on the Ph.D. of Googlefu-database-master-of-all-watch-knowledge @JohnR725, so I did my own research using, in part, the Marshall Handy Manual...feel free to check my work 😃

Balance staff was broken, and I found a cracked jewel.

Decided to tackle the staff first and then circle back to the jewel.  With the help of the Handy Manual et al., I found the part number and  Ofrei has it, so I can buy it for a small sum.  However, I have jars of staffs, so I decided to find one close and turn it to fit.  I found one that was pretty close and spent the next four hours on the lathe.  I shortened it, skinnyed it up here and there and did a test mount in the watch to confirm end shake.  I used my Dads Seitz jewel measuring tool to test the pivots as I was turning--far easier than using a caliper (110 um diameter...BTW, the bonding pad on an integrated circuit up until the deep submicron stuff is typically around 100um). I was feeling pretty uppity, thinking watchmakers have nothing on me.  Then, as the old scripture says, "Pride goeth before destruction and a haughty spirit before a fall."  Yup I fell pretty hard.  As you can see, the roller arbor diameter is 0.55mm,  I was at about 0.59mm or so and decided it was close enough.  NO SIR.  I split the safety roller.  That was pretty much the end of the day.  I was deeply humbled and deserved what I got!

Today, I am returning to this watch and putting my pride aside and considering buying the roller assembly and staff which I have found on the internet.  The staff is at Ofrei, and the roller on Ebay (and perhaps other places).

Here is my question.  Should I attempt to replace the cracked jewel?  On the one hand, I should, if only for the experience.  On the other, the owner really does not care (and I am not charging for my work...and my pay out of pocket for any parts I replace.

A penny for your thoughts on the jewel!!

2022-02-19 09_27_15-Elgin Pocket Watch_ Serial Number 20526801 (Grade 384).pdf - Foxit PhantomPDF.png

2022-02-19 09_26_15-Elgin Balance Staffs for American Watches — Mozilla Firefox.png

2022-02-19 09_43_59-Marshall Handy Manual_Marshall 3.pdf - Foxit PhantomPDF.png

2022-02-19 09_48_51-Marshall Handy Manual_Marshall 4.pdf - Foxit PhantomPDF.png

2022-02-18 10_01_36-IMG_8097.CR2 ‎- Photos.png

2022-02-18 10_21_36-Elgin Grade 384 (Model 3) Parts for Pocket Watch_ Serial Number 20526801 — Mozil.pdf

Posted
3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

As you can see, the roller arbor diameter is 0.55mm,  I was at about 0.59mm or so and decided it was close enough. 

0.04mm is high interference even on big and strong parts. How much is right is one of the most difficult things to judge and get correct. Better luck the next time.

Posted
5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

cracked jewel.

Being nitpicky to start the day you probably should say balance jewel. Because we tend to end up with lots of flawed jewels in pocket watches.

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Seitz jewel measuring tool to test the pivots as I was turning--far easier than using a caliper

Yes definitely nicer then some other measuring device including a micrometer because it's light weight you're less likely to do bad things.

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

As you can see, the roller arbor diameter is 0.55mm,  I was at about 0.59mm or so and decided it was close enough.  NO SIR.  I split the safety roller.  That was pretty much the end of the day.  I was deeply humbled and deserved what I got!

 

Rules when replacing American pocket watch staffs? The classic rule is to measure the old staff then of course measure the new staff and make sure they exactly agree.  Never assume when purchasing an American pocket watch staffs by a part number that it's just going to fit because there's usually variations. The most common will be pivots size variation but there will be other variations.

Then what's the next rule really important that you forgot about the parts Must fit. Typically if the old and new were identical they should fit but you still want to make sure they fit.

Most common places where fitting is a big issue is well everything on the staff to be honest.

Roller table normally witschi Delia put it on the staff in it has to drop a certain distance because it's slightly tapered shaft. Can't remember the exact drop but let's say around two thirds. As you discovered if you're back and then one half or one quarter category that's a heck of a lot of where Al yes that's a little too much if it goes almost to the bottom it might not hold tight. So some point in time when you're putting a staff together with the parts you have to make sure they actually seem to fit as opposed to whatever the dimensions are supposed to be.

Then I'm attaching an image of it noticed the very top of the image where it came from company that no longer exists. It's far as I know there are no PDFs of this in existence in the wild. I've occasionally seen it for sale on eBay is a printed copy. Tens to be quite good for dimensions. The reason I gave you the entire section is it a lot of the other staffs that are close and see which ones are you will be best to modify like the 1905 looks like one has a hub thickness bigger than yours just reduce at the FETs you'll be fine the other one is too small adding material is problematic the 1905 staff also demonstrates a problem with American pocket watch staffs which is their variations

like for instance at the site below it indicates there's a variation for your staff but it appears to be the only variation was the pivots. But the 1905 staff demonstrates variations for other stuff which is all too common very confusing to people when their brand-new staff by part number doesn't fit and they definitely did not measure it because why should they they have a part number part numbers are perfect

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

 

Balance jewel? It's hard to tell from the image the flaw crack break that goes straight across as to whether that's going to be an issue or not? Usually if you look inside the jewel and the flaw is just a visual flawed not a huge crack it's not an issue. Sometimes you can even have a crack it just depends on which way it angles like in a train wheel pivots angled so it's not complaining like a metal plane the metal on the pivot and if you look at the pivot it looks perfect it's probably fine. Although people get upset about the flaws in one of change over jewels and considering these are mostly natural stones that's going to be an issue

 the chip on top this interesting of the? It's probably not going to hurt the balance pivot itself but it's definitely going to upset lubrication. Capillary action would normally keep the lubrication to the center of the jewel but with those chips it's conceivable your lubrication is going to wick away and disappear really fast.

Elgin 12 size balance staffs all of them.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Being nitpicky to start the day you probably should say balance jewel. Because we tend to end up with lots of flawed jewels in pocket watches

i seldom win these...but, in fairness, I did not show the full plate.  It is not the balance jewel.  I believe it is the third wheel.  See pic.

Thanks for the image...it is now stored with the images of the movement.  You continue to prove that you are the god of watch databases.  Be sure that nobody knows your address...or at least that your books are all stored in a quality gun safe.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Be sure that nobody knows your address...or at least that your books are all stored in a quality gun safe

Somewhere on this discussion group I think they were talking about Mark's new shop  which of course was new a century ago? So people were commenting about books so I showed a picture of where my horological books mainly are and I probably just about need a gun safe to fit them all in  but I don't have a gun safe.. So if you could find that image you can see how many horological books I have  other than those that never made it to the shelf yet  bad habit of acquiring books

Then for a lot of key paperwork items they been converted the PDFs.. Is really annoying when paper doesn't last forever  even more annoying if you have a photocopy from way back when one photocopies really sucked and they start fading away  where PDFs tend the last forever. Especially if they're stored across multiple hard drives just in case something fails

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

I joined NAWCC thinking it would open up a vast database.  I even payed a pretty penny to get Silver level.  So far I have not found the honey pot.  Maybe it is in their physical library...which is not anywhere close to me.

Posted
1 minute ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I joined NAWCC thinking it would open up a vast database.  I even payed a pretty penny to get Silver level.  So far I have not found the honey pot.  Maybe it is in their physical library...which is not anywhere close to me.

Yes  there located in a nice central location easily get to buy all of us  if we had Star Trek beaming technology.. Even where there located I've heard they're still in the middle of no place because basically that's where the founder originally lived in the middle of no place  but you're a lot closer than I am.

Not to say there aren't resources there is a discussion group except that's open to anybody.. You can ask questions their people will be helpful.. You do have to be careful not to touch on certain subjects because that can end really poorly for you but I'll skip over how I know about that.

They do have some online resource help like you can look up some serial numbers and get the original extract at least for Hamilton. There supposed to have a huge Elgin archive of stuff but  they also claimed there grossly understaffed and that probably will never be scanned ever..

Then of course you have access to the bulletin magazine you go to the index and try to look up things there  has been some interesting articles in the bulletins over the Years

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
×
×
  • Create New...