Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all and Happy New Year.

I’m new to this magic of wheels and would appreciate some advice so I can learn.

I’ve just finished servicing a Raketa Kopernic with 2609 HA movement and have found a big difference in rate, dependent on position. I don’t recall this being the case prior to the service.  I demagnetised the movement prior to regulation using my Elma Antimag.

The timegrapher shows nice steady traces and I can regulate the dial up position to +4s/d but here’s what else I find:

Dial Up: +4s/d,  amp 330,  0.0mS 

Dial down: -45s/d, amp 286, 0.0mS

Crown down: -42s/d, amp 289, 0.0mS

I can adjust to the following rates:

DU: +15s/d

DD: -20s/d

Crown Down: -11s/d

Which will average things out over those 3 positions, but my question is - what are the possible  causes of the big difference between the Dial up and Dial down rates?  What have I done or not done during the service which has caused this difference?

Any advice gratefully received.

Cheers,

John in Tasmania.

Posted

In general its worn/dirty balance pivot or jewels of cock/ mainplate or impulse also excessive balance pivot end shake. I check the end shake before taking anything apart.

I don't think you are dealing with hairspring intermitent sticking or any part rubbing.

Regs

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Agree with Nucejoe end shake could be the culprit particularly with a big difference in performance between DU and DD. If no end shake then re clean the upper and lower cap jewels and re lubricate. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Then it's always nice to show us a picture just because we like to see pictures.

11 hours ago, Zendoc said:

I don’t recall this being the case prior to the service.  

This is where I'd like to record the before servicing and after servicing numbers. It's nice to see a comparison and see if you've increase the amplitude improved the watch etc.

11 hours ago, Zendoc said:

Dial Up: +4s/d,  amp 330,  0.0mS 

Dial down: -45s/d, amp 286, 0.0mS

Crown down: -42s/d, amp 289, 0.0mS

Did you notice an interesting problem here? Who cares about the rate sort of what about the amplitude? 330° dial-up Then you lose 44° dial down and actually have better amplitude in crown down? Typically dial up and dial down should be very very close to identical in amplitude.

Then personally I always like to look at the watch in six positions four separate crown positions and dial up and down.

Here's something fun try an experiment in dial-up let some of the power off the mainspring bring the amplitude down to about 280° and then tell us what sort of time keeping you have? I suspect your regulator pins are too far apart which is why you're having an amplitude timekeeping issue. Then you have to take care your pivots because dial-up and dial down can not be that different it's very bad if a crown position is better then a dial position not impossible but it's just really really bad to do that.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks everyone for your interest and advice. 

There were two issues, I think.

These movements often have 0, 1 or 2 shims under the balance cock. This movement had 2.  I removed one of them, the end shake reduced and things improved significantly.  I also had a careful re-look at the balance spring and it had a few unusual twists and the end curve was eccentric.  I removed the spring, smoothed all that out, refitted the balance and re-cleaned and lubricated the balance jewels.  

The end result is that the movement is now running nicely - the amplitudes are now as expected.  Thanks JohnR725 for your explanations which make perfect sense. And yes, I’ll get into the habit of documenting the watch performance on the timegrapher before servicing - allows meaningful comparison.  Thanks for the prompt.  As I said, I’m new to all this. Lots to learn.

Thanks again!

Until next time,

John

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...