Jump to content

Pendelum Suspension Spring


canthus

Recommended Posts

Hi, I was asked to look at an old mantle clock with a basic English made pendulum movement.  The suspension spring for the pendelum was partly missing with only the top part left pinned.  Is there anyway of calculating the size of a replacement spring?  I can work out the possible mid-position for the pendulum and lever rod assembly but do not know what strength (ie thickness, width, length, number of leaves etc) the spring should be.  I have returned the clock now but wouldn't mind having another look at it if I can solve the spring issue.  Can anybody give some guidance.  Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I presume it is the spring at the top of the pendulum rod. The strength is not critical in fact I don't think they are supplied with different strengths just different shapes & sizes. The pic below is from Cousins & shows the measurements you need.

This is a common breakage caused by either clocks being moved or pendulums being adjusted without first removing the pendulum.

 

PS If I have got it wrong what you require post a picture

 

 

post-234-0-15320400-1430767161_thumb.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Clockboy,  I did go through these and others at the time and identified a few candidates.  However I could not find anything re strength/stiffness required so gave up on that project.  If as you say any strength will do, I may revisit and buy a selection (they are not expensive) to try out.  Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Providing it is one of the short springs such as I showed in my first post they all work. However there are long suspension springs that actually can form part of the pendulum. If it is one of these then things gets a bit more complicated as you will need to know the total length of the pendulum. Too short or too long & you will run out of adjustment when getting the clock in time.

To calculate the required pendulum length go to either of the following sites.

 

http://www.nawcc-index.net/CalcPendulumLength.php

 

http://www.abbeyclock.com/Pendulum.html

 

 

 

post-234-0-40778900-1430843799.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks clockboy.  It was the shorter type as per your first post, with 2 springs and pin top & bottom I think.  Have bookmarked the links for when I have another go at this project, probably in the summer (if we get one!). It has been a long time since I had to do the maths like the ones indicated!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip Anil.  I did many measurements at the time to determine the range of spring length but didn't know how stiff it should be.  As I said, I will source a few different ones (bearing in mind your tip) when I get around to looking at it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The wheels turned fine. I set the escape wheel in the epoxy when it had just ‘skinned’ and wasn’t set, made sure it spun with the 4th wheel, and let it set.    After cleaning I assembled the barrel and wheel train - all fine. Moving the barrel the escape wheel spun freely. I put a bit of 9010 in my epoxy setting.    It went wrong when I put the pallet fork in. It wasn’t seated right (no jewels) and the escape wheel  knocked a pallet jewel out. I have no idea how to reset a pallet jewel - epoxy again? I’m not spending any more time on this one - it’s missing hands and the front half of the case anyway, and I have more watches ready to put on the bench. 
    • No John, we don't want Mark to change anything, we are just scared of losing a brilliant forum and losing contact with each other.  As pointed out, this forum is full of knowledge and I for one,  consider the regulars friends. I would hate to lose contact with you and the others.   PS, this forum is really important to me. 
    • one little minor problem with your chemistry experiment here which is what exactly is epilam? In other words is it an exact substance with the chemical you specify or is it a term? For instance originally it was steric acid either dissolved in some sort of solvent or it was applied by vaporizing it. Then now it's all kinds of different things the watch companies all have different ideas there's a whole bunch of patents. So is not always an exact substance.   let me snip out a image from the patent that I attached up above. Notice I highlighted something it seems to disagree with your evaluation.  
    • I guess You had to try, as it would be hard to sleep without that try, but, I know the result before the experiment... As I told before, the friction will be so big that the wheel will not turn. The pivots have to be thin and polished - the bigger the number of the wheel (2th, 3gh, 4th...), the thinner the pivot. What You are trying to do is possible, but forming the new thin pivot must be done on lathe. Thus the wheel will get shorter, but can have new pivot without the drilling for normal standard repivoting. Then piece of brass can be soldered under the pivot hole in the bridge and new hole drilled in it to form the new bearing.  Well, this way is not the recommended one, not quite correct, but it is possible to do for the excersize... When I say lathe, lathe may be verry simple, someting like turns, but made of what one has in reach of his hands. If You want to try, I will try to guide
    • yes by all means let's gather up our weapons tar feathers find the nearest tree in case Mark is not agreeable to our terms on our demands and storm his Castle. I don't quite understand what you're trying to do here? In other words you want Mark to somehow guarantee that the group will live on forever no matter what? You want Mark to somehow change his business model of what is trying to do or should we just take the group away from him? oh and is quite possible that Mark never realized that his discussion group would take on a life of its own. That the members of the group would like to continue on forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...