Jump to content

Vintage IWC case disassembly


handwound

Recommended Posts

Hello fellow watch repairers,

I recently got this beautiful IWC with the caliber 853:

IMG_4421.thumb.jpg.7af69238e3d00cd324cebc4df671d25a.jpg

On the timegrapher it actually performed quite well, but when I looked at the movement I decided that it could benefit from a service. Problem is, that I can't get it out of the case. I removed the clamps that you can see in the following pictures, but I didn't wanted to leave the case. You could turn the whole movement, but apparently there was no way to lift it out. I also checked, if the part around the movement is actually a movement ring, but it seems to be all solid. 

IMG_4452.thumb.JPEG.82a9ecabd3da77ac5715e9b59f8fb0ef.JPEGIMG_4453.thumb.JPEG.7eba68205e726a32cc31e682cb2acf50.JPEG

So I guessed, that it might be a front loader and you need to remove the bezel to get it out, but it sits absolutely flush with the case and there is no gap to insert a knife. 

IMG_4454.thumb.JPEG.8a768b2e548e32d96a39833756604f05.JPEG

Does anybody have any ideas how I could remove the movement, without ruining the case? Any help would be greatly appreciated 🙂 

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi It could be potentialy a front loader  If so remove the bezel (if no notch) use a sharp blade Ie safty razor blade or stanly. Be very careful and wear a protective glove just in case.  Work your way round the bezel untill you either gain entry or make enough headway to insert a case knife.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a 3-digit case reference number inside the case back? Eg “820”. 
 

The case will very likely be 3-piece, but that doesn’t necessarily make it a front-load assembly. There will possibly be no lip for the bezel ring which I think is done for aesthetics. Try to squeeze a razor blade in to start it lifting. 
 

Separate issue, but I would want to correct that buffed finish as it has rounded the edges and doesn’t look right. Even removing the finish would help. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rodabod said:

Is there a 3-digit case reference number inside the case back? Eg “820”. 
 

The case will very likely be 3-piece, but that doesn’t necessarily make it a front-load assembly. There will possibly be no lip for the bezel ring which I think is done for aesthetics. Try to squeeze a razor blade in to start it lifting. 
 

Separate issue, but I would want to correct that buffed finish as it has rounded the edges and doesn’t look right. Even removing the finish would help. 

Unfortunately not, I already tried to figure out the reference the last days, but no success. 

I will try removing it with a razor blade 👍

As for the finish: it doesn't really bother me much. Maybe it's also a bit caused by the lighting, in person the brushing is actually really subtle and the edges aren't looking too bad. But in the end it's all personal preference 🙂 

Thanks for your answers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you everybody for the replies and advices
    • Yesterday evening I was trolling the net ( as we all do)  when I stumbled on this vid. Last month there was a debate on are Chinese tools worth purchasing and I gave my thoughts that being the biggest differences is the materials used to make them and also they are not built to the Swiss fine tolerances. The tool he shows to compare with the Seitz jeweling tool I am sure is Chinese and shows the point I was tring to make.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIqQcVLgtB0
    • Good afternoon. More than once I've damaged balance staffs because  tight steady pins necessitating force to get the balance cock in place. I assume the steady pins get slightly deformed over the years by over enthusiastic balance cock removal. So now I take the lesser evil of using a smoothing broach on the steady pin holes so I get the feel and control back when fitting the cock. Is this the best option or am I missing a trick? Thanks all. 
    • I dont have any personal friends who are watch nerds so I have to share my joy with y'all 🙂  If you saw my other thread I had bought a Elgin Sportsman to start learning on after getting fairly proficient with my practice movement. I ended up stripping out some threads in the main plate and abandoning that project. I was able to clean it and get it running again so I learned a ton.  Next up, a Gruen Precision that I got off ebay. This project took forever and after realizing the balance was no good and buying a donor movement I was able to get it back in working order. I dont have a time grapher yet but I've been wearing it for 2 days and its keeping pretty dang good time!  - Disassembled, cleaned and reassembled / lubed the entire movement.  - Pressed in a new crystal - Replaced the strap - Replaced the crown (the old crown was just destroyed) One thing that really killed me was that I scratched the dial with my hand levers. I was just rushing because I was frustrated (had to take the hands off a few extra times because they weren't flat) lesson learned.    Next up is a Seiko that I also got on ebay. This will be my first automatic, and my first date complication. Super excited and so glad I found this hobby!   
    • Well I actually looked more into it and I think the answer is the following: ST36/3600 is not a clone of ETA6497 it is a clone of OP XI which is a derivation of the ETA. And when you look at both they are actually complete clones (the beat, the bridge shapes even the decoration).  
×
×
  • Create New...