Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

20210901_222422.thumb.jpg.14ebf3e40ac2a5da309871e626595a02.jpg20210901_222505.thumb.jpg.878a6cfe2ab58b8d970c9f86a16f2c2d.jpg

I was working on a Bulova quartz watch last night and came across an ETA 955.411. The circuit was drawing an  excessive amount of current. So I removed the pcb from the movement and tested it again. It was still drawing the same amount of current.

I checked if Cousins had a spare but it was marked as obsolete. A check on eBay also came up empty. I checked Ranfft website and it had a long list of 955 variants. The movement plate looks identical except the pcb had minor differences. 

Does anyone know if it is possible to replace the pcb of a 955.411 with say a 955.412?

And Aliexpress has an OEM pcb for a 955. And it has a whole list of variants that it can work with.

https://a.aliexpress.com/_m08I0dH

Has anyone tried a Chinese pcb? 

TIA

 

Posted

Were you able to measure how much current it draws exactly? Any difference when inhibited (crown out)?

The 411 to 412 (and 414) stepping could just be moving the PCB from old-school trimmer to internal adjustment, where the rest of the movement stays the same -- but I'm not sure either.

Luckily it's only $5 on your ali link, so no harm trying 🙂    Except that it could take weeks to arrive..

Posted
6 hours ago, teegee said:

Were you able to measure how much current it draws exactly? Any difference when inhibited (crown out)?

The movement would draw about 11uA for a few secs then short out and go FSD. (About 25 uA)

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
    • Well, my fundamental stance is that I want to go in and out without leaving any trace other than a shining, perfectly running movement. So, no scratchings on the inside of the case back lid, no marred screws, no debris, no fingerprints, and so on. That is, my goal is to make it impossible for the FBI to track me down. As a professional, I suppose you might want to keep track of returning watches, but as @JohnR725 mentioned, we can keep detailed computer records without marking the watch at all. That may not be true for every watch, but luxury and COSC-certified movements do have unique numbers. John also says it’s best to leave no sign you were ever there, and I couldn't agree more. Now, suppose the Sea-Dweller I'm working on is one day scrapped, and you want to sell the case-back separately (perhaps the case was destroyed in a plane crash). Then the scribbles on the inside no longer reflect the current movement inside the case. Also, the engraving will likely halve the market value of the case back. It had been "sleeping" for about a week and a half. Yes, the "debris/old lubricant" theory is my hypothesis as well! It will be interesting to see what I find once I have time to start disassembling the movement.
    • I've repaired a few of these, having some success with stripping and cleaning the mechanism.  They are so cheap though, its hardly worth the effort in many cases.
    • Get well soon Old Hippy, torn muscles.,  not good
    • Id love to see how he has the output shaft mounted to this setup, as I have the same rotary stage and stepper in my build.
×
×
  • Create New...