Jump to content

Omega Calibre 612


Recommended Posts

Hello

Does anyone have any info on this movement? It seems that there are not much info out there on the web about it. Can find lots of info on the 613 but not the 12.

So far this is what I have found

It is a manual winding movement, 12 1/2 lignes in size, has a date function, 17 jewels, 38 hour power reserve, beats at 19,800 A/hr

I am very curious as to the years of production and what models and case numbers it was used in.

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Daniel

post-960-0-17618400-1429907758.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my knowledge the Cal 612 was produced from 1959 to 1966 , the exact quantity is not known but can range from 100,000 to 330,000 units per year over a 6-7 year period, how many of the 612 were made, Omega never noted.

 

Although not as commonly found the 612 shares pretty much the same construction as the 613, infact i don't even recall if there is a difference at all. They likely discontinued the use of the caliber # as they may have wanted to use 613 designation in its place and saw no need to have a cal 612.

 

Going only from memory i believe the 612 was used in Ladies Geneve & DeVille models as well as a handful of others, although exact watches i could not tell you as most were then used with cal 613 or similar.

 

Not much more i can tell you but i hope it helps a little. Slightly rarer but i don't think any more valuable than a 613 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info. I figured it was from about that timeframe.

Here are a few more pics of the watch. i would love to get some feedback on what you guys think of it.

The movement looks 100% real to me but the case has me thinking that it has been recased at some point. There are no markings on the case that I can find. The only markings are on the case back. I'll post a pic of that.

Recase or not I love the watch. My friends jokingly call me Don Draper when I wear it. :) and it keeps time as good as every new eta movement that I have.

post-960-0-33404900-1430159800_thumb.jpg

post-960-0-87907400-1430159814_thumb.jpg

post-960-0-23327100-1430159831_thumb.jpg

post-960-0-95809500-1430159849_thumb.jpg

post-960-0-15619600-1430159871_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The serial number dates it to 1970 , but i would think it has been re-cased as i can't find that case number at the moment relating to a seamaster and there is no seamaster logo on the case back so it is possibly a fraken but will do a bit more looking .

edit looks to be a Geneve case from c1967 which housed a 613 calibre so it is possibly a redial with a seamaster dial

Edited by Andyclient
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's how I feel about it. I like the look. It will get use. And considering what my wife paid for it, what a steal.

That's the main thing you like it will wear it and enjoy it, that's what it's all about in the end

It's a nice looking watch and if it was a bargain even better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am wondering if I should source an original geneve dial and put it back to what it should look like.

I like thevwaybitblooks but I would hate to be called out on it by someone who knows watches. I wouldn't want anyone to think I was trying to pass off a fake.

Maybe I am just being overly sensitive.

What to you guys think? I am not looking to increase the value of of the watch. And I don't sell my watches. I keep and whear them. So it would be only for me.

maybe I'm just being silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, I wouldn't bust a gut over it. If you like the way it looks, feels and runs, then just enjoy it.

 

It looks fine to me - it's not every day I run into a pub and say, "Hi guys - let's compare Omegas!" :D

 

Cheers,

 

Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am wondering if I should source an original geneve dial and put it back to what it should look like.

I like thevwaybitblooks but I would hate to be called out on it by someone who knows watches. I wouldn't want anyone to think I was trying to pass off a fake.

Maybe I am just being overly sensitive.

What to you guys think? I am not looking to increase the value of of the watch. And I don't sell my watches. I keep and whear them. So it would be only for me.

maybe I'm just being silly.

Or a seamaster case. :-). I would keep as is. Be proud if it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its about how the watch makes you feel, if you enjoy it then it matters not a dot what anyone else thinks :)

 

Personally i like it ( and i am a big omega fan ), and if it keeps good time then all the better. The original watch may be long gone but even trying to replicate it would still not make it original so enjoy the watch as it is, theres nothing wrong with a re-case if it means a decent movement can live on :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its about how the watch makes you feel, if you enjoy it then it matters not a dot what anyone else thinks :)

Personally i like it ( and i am a big omega fan ), and if it keeps good time then all the better. The original watch may be long gone but even trying to replicate it would still not make it original so enjoy the watch as it is, theres nothing wrong with a re-case if it means a decent movement can live on :)

Spot on , totally agree
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok, I'll admit that @JohnR725 has a point here. First and foremost, YOU decide. And YOU have to be comfortable doing it. It's also good advice to finish the automatic Seiko before going to the next watch.   In defense of the "encouragement" posted above: when I serviced the Tissot 783, it was actually my second automatic watch and it was only about one year ago. So I didn't forget how it feels being in your position.  Without a doubt, there is a learning curve. But I, personally (!!!), found it quite doable. It was a simpler auto system than some ETAs, Omegas and Rolexes that I worked on afterwards.  But very important: this is only gentle encouragement. Nobody here is "pushing you" to try.   And that said, I fully support your decision to...      
    • So, I did an experiment. Not a fair one, I'll warn already. I compared the performance of the automatic works with: a) old (but functioning) reversing wheel, cleaned and treated with V105 b) new ETA reversing wheel, taken as-is from the blister   Test 1: signs of rotor spinning when manual winding --> both performed fine, but the new wheel was better (super smooth) Test 2: With the automatic works fully assembled but not installed in the movement, held vertically, let the rotor swing from a 90° angle. --> new wheel the clear winner   As I said, not a fair comparison because I'm comparing an old wheel (functioning, but potentially with slight wear) with a brand new one.   But still, I think it's sufficient confirmation that the potentially-old ETA wheels sold by  CousinsUK are still in perfect condition despite their age and don't need new lubrication.
    • My first guess would be a friction spring, something that helps hold it in place when not being driven? If I'm understanding the diagram for that movement correctly, the lower centre hand is on item 52 in the drawing, "Hour counting wheel " - and that appears to be an assembly with a spring friction clutch included, between the driving wheel and hand / reset cam? It's shown in the calendar works assembly drawing, page 22.   Or is the "reset" actuator supposed to remain solidly against the cams, and there is some slight loss of pressure on that somewhere, an eccentric screw or pin that needs adjusting? I've never worked on one of that style so I'm not 100% on the chrono disengagement or reset.   I'm looking at the ETA 7751 technical manual, linked via this page: https://shopb2b.eta.ch/en/mecaline.html?p=3  
    • Oh boy!!! Thanks again for your post of this. I hadn't oiled there and the watch was running fine anyways (280° amplitude, fully wound, dial up). But I now added a bit of 9010 at that point of the seconds pinion and amplitude jumped to 300-310!! Wow. 
    • Evening Hector, Your are  a wealth of knowledge, thank you, I did look hard but obviuosly not hard enough, my bad !! Regards CJ  
×
×
  • Create New...