Jump to content

Source of Large Positional Variation?


Recommended Posts

I've just serviced a previously running Seagull ST36, as part of Level 2 of Mark's watch repair course.  Prior to servicing, the rate in all positions was between -6 and +6 s/d and was steady for each position.  After servicing, there is a large positional variation between dial-up and dial-down.  In addition, in one position the rate takes one of two distinct values.

Dial-up, the rate is about +30 s/d.  Dial-down, it starts at -10, but will eventually switch to +30.  I find that if I tap the movement with my finger in dial-down, it will immediately switch rates from -10 to +30.  In all other positions the rate is a steady +30 or so, and the amplitude in all cases is between 270 and 290.  Interestingly, when the rate switches from -10 to +30 the timegrapher shows the beat error changing from 0.8ms to 0.1, although I don't know if this is an artifact.

What could be the source of this behavior?  Could it be improper oiling of the balance jewels?  I've had difficulty getting them perfectly oiled as per Mark's instruction, even after several attempts.  I can see a circle of oil in the upper jewel, although the width is a bit below Mark's recommended 50%.  The lower jewel appears to be slightly over-oiled, with oil extending to the edges of the jewel for about half the circumference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Giannifive said:

I've just serviced a previously running Seagull ST36, as part of Level 2 of Mark's watch repair course.  Prior to servicing, the rate in all positions was between -6 and +6 s/d and was steady for each position.  After servicing, there is a large positional variation between dial-up and dial-down.  In addition, in one position the rate takes one of two distinct values.

Dial-up, the rate is about +30 s/d.  Dial-down, it starts at -10, but will eventually switch to +30.  I find that if I tap the movement with my finger in dial-down, it will immediately switch rates from -10 to +30.  In all other positions the rate is a steady +30 or so, and the amplitude in all cases is between 270 and 290.  Interestingly, when the rate switches from -10 to +30 the timegrapher shows the beat error changing from 0.8ms to 0.1, although I don't know if this is an artifact.

What could be the source of this behavior?  Could it be improper oiling of the balance jewels?  I've had difficulty getting them perfectly oiled as per Mark's instruction, even after several attempts.  I can see a circle of oil in the upper jewel, although the width is a bit below Mark's recommended 50%.  The lower jewel appears to be slightly over-oiled, with oil extending to the edges of the jewel for about half the circumference.

Magnetism could be the issue. But more likely some issue with a pivot. Tapping and the watch rate changes might be a pivot slipping back into the jewel. As well, you may have a sticky hairspring and the tap releases it. Is it magnetized or perhaps some oil on the hairspring. Have a close look or videotape in slowmo with your iPhone and have a look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the suggestions.  Demagnetizing didn't have an effect, so I cleaned the balance again.  I used One Dip this time instead of naphtha like I had been using, and that did the trick.  The hairspring must not have been fully clean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Giannifive said:

Thanks for the suggestions.  Demagnetizing didn't have an effect, so I cleaned the balance again.  I used One Dip this time instead of naphtha like I had been using, and that did the trick.  The hairspring must not have been fully clean.

Good job. Amazing how a gummed up hairspring impacts positional error

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Giannifive said:

I used One Dip this time instead of naphtha like I had been using, and that did the trick.  The hairspring must not have been fully clean.

just to be clear rinsing solved all your problems?

then are you really using naphtha or lighter fluid?

then also helpful if you give us a picture of your timing machine results because sometimes we can see things in the graphical display that you might not see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
    • Probably easier to get a complete new movement - but CousinsUK list it as discontinued. Maybe someone on here knows a substitute movement ?
    • Any other thoughts on how I can get a replacement coil? Any “hidden” or unknown physical shops (in Australia or elsewhere) that might have them in stock (but not always online)?
×
×
  • Create New...