Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I need some advice on the mainspring for this watch. I am getting great amplitude in the region of 305 degrees at full wind that drops to around 285 after a minute or so. Positional variation is very good, delta of 6. Watch has been fully cleaned, lubed (including the mainspring) and regulated and is consistently keeping time to a rate of less than 1 second per day gain. However if I go on a vigorous walk for 30 minutes the watch can easily gain 5 seconds in that time (240 SPD!!! for that period). I think that I am suffering from re-banking. Incidentally I found that the barrel and arbor are identical to that of a Seiko 7005. The measured spring dimensions are 0.95 x 0.125 x 380 mm. The spring is flat and the barrel wall is lubricated with 8217 grease. The spring is flat and does slip after 6 turns or so. I am suspecting that the spring is too strong. What would you guys do in this situation? Try a different spring? In fact the GR catalogue suggests a spring of 0.95 x 0.11 x 400 for Seiko 7005 (GR2377X); would that end up too weak? Would I be better trying (GR2378X) 0.95 x 0.12 x 400 mm ?

Posted

actually when I say 'vigorous walk' that is a bit of an exaggeration. My arm moves a bit as it does when walking but I am not waving it up and down as in a military march.

Posted

I am a bit confused about the watch requires the new spring. I presume it is not a Seiko. If the watch is running OK but with variable timing issues it will not be the mainspring.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, clockboy said:

I am a bit confused about the watch requires the new spring. I presume it is not a Seiko. If the watch is running OK but with variable timing issues it will not be the mainspring.

I believe that the mainspring is too strong so it causes rebanking at full wind. The Orient 48748 movement is very similar to Seiko 7005 in many ways. Pallet fork, escape wheel and barrel are identical to Seiko 7005.

Posted
19 hours ago, steve1811uk said:

I believe that the mainspring is too strong so it causes rebanking at full wind. The Orient 48748 movement is very similar to Seiko 7005 in many ways. Pallet fork, escape wheel and barrel are identical to Seiko 7005.

It could be a Seiko movement. I have worked on a Rotary watch which was Seiko movement just with Rotary engraved on it. How does it perform with half a wind. 

Posted
2 hours ago, clockboy said:

It could be a Seiko movement.

It is not. Orient is a fully fledged Japanese watch manufacturer. They always used some Seiko technology until at some point Seiko Epson quietly bought them out. They never used mainstream Seiko movements and always maintained full independence in design, manufacturing (in-house movement to speak like a collector), and sales.

Posted
2 hours ago, clockboy said:

It could be a Seiko movement. I have worked on a Rotary watch which was Seiko movement just with Rotary engraved on it. How does it perform with half a wind. 

Performs fine at less than full wind. At full wind it goes over 300 degrees and I think it rebanks as it gains 5 seconds in half an hour walking.

Posted
On 5/24/2021 at 12:38 PM, steve1811uk said:

However if I go on a vigorous walk for 30 minutes the watch can easily gain 5 seconds in that time (240 SPD!!! for that period). I think that I am suffering from re-banking.

That seems to be the same issue you had with another Japanese watch time ago? It never reached a firm conclusion.

Regrettably I can't offer exact advice on the matter except that in both cases perhaps the movement winds up a bit too much? Maybe not using any sophisticated anti-braking products could help. In other words you could try what happens doing the brisky walk with the watch unwound.

Posted
14 hours ago, jdm said:

It is not. Orient is a fully fledged Japanese watch manufacturer. They always used some Seiko technology until at some point Seiko Epson quietly bought them out. They never used mainstream Seiko movements and always maintained full independence in design, manufacturing (in-house movement to speak like a collector), and sales.

OK did not know that. Just in my GR book no reference to Orient. To be honest a pic of the movement would be helpful.

Posted
18 hours ago, jdm said:

That seems to be the same issue you had with another Japanese watch time ago? It never reached a firm conclusion.

Regrettably I can't offer exact advice on the matter except that in both cases perhaps the movement winds up a bit too much? Maybe not using any sophisticated anti-braking products could help. In other words you could try what happens doing the brisky walk with the watch unwound.

I had the issue again this morning after leaving the watch off all night, it gained 5 seconds in the first hour of wearing it, things such as getting dressed, washing hair, eating breakfast etc. pushed it over the edge. I'm going to try a weaker mainspring GR2377X (recommended for Seiko 7005) and will report how the amplitude compares.

Posted

Well, I tried the GR2377X mainspring and early signs are that the rebanking issue has been solved. Amplitude horizontal after wear is 270 degrees and that drops to around 260 degrees after ten minutes or so (compared with 305/285 before). No big step gain in time even after walking for over two hours. Notes: bridle of GR2377X was only 0.13 mm thick compared with Seiko 0.18 mm (it slips nicely with 8217 grease, three small blobs on the barrel wall). Also bridle was welded on one turn before the end of the spring, unlike Seiko bridle that is welded at the very end of the spring. Centre coil was also too wide and did not catch the arbor. I had to close it up with some fine bent nose pliers, making multiple small adjustments approx 1mm apart around the centre coil. Don't try and do this with a single big adjustment as you will break the spring. Conclusion: Seiko mainspring especially the bridle is too strong and does not slip before the torque gets too much causing the rebanking. Probably works perfectly though after 15 years or so without service giving suitable amplitude when the oils have dried up.

Posted

Update: Walked 12 miles yesterday in around four hours on my day off work. The watch lost 0.1 seconds during the walk. I'm very happy that the rebanking had been cured. The watch is running around 0.7 seconds slow during daily wear and gains that back dial up overnight. I'm going to test the power reserve soon as I know that some forum members have had issues getting a decent power reserve with the GR2377X.

Screenshot_20210603-094033.png

Posted

Amplitude +24 Hr from full wind
DU 225 degrees
DD 219 degrees
PL 202 degrees
PD 205 degrees
PR 209 degrees
PU 208 degrees

Power reserve measured at 44 hours. Very happy.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If a runner, I usually let the movement run in naphta for a minute, some movements need a bit of encouragement to run in liquids, so a quick dip of the movement in naphta then remove and encourage the oscilator with puffer, repeat several soaks.  Or if you don't want to soak or dip the movement in cleaning solution ,   keep putting naphta on jewel holes as the movement runs on bench. A pre-clean of some sort  helps.  Avoid lifting out the fork with tweezers or any tool.  Try blowing fork pivot out  with strong puff of air from jewels holes back side. Good luck .      
    • 60! Wow, that's a lot. Can't say I understand the problem because disassembly is usually quite uneventful, except for springs launching into space. Most people break pivots during assembly. I use a homemade brass pry tool to loosen parts. It's just a short length of hard brass wire sharpened to a chisel point. Don't pry at just one point and crowbar it out. Pry at the notch and when a crack opens up, slip the pry tool in and loosen it at a few more points until the bridge is free.
    • Beginner here. Of about 60 watches I’ve serviced and repaired, I’ve broken a pallet pivot on three, always during disassembly, and usually when the old oil has transformed to glue. Each watch was Swiss, in case that makes a difference. Here’s what happened in each case: - unscrewed the pallet bridge or cock - gently inserted a screwdriver in the  slot under the pallet bridge or cock - gently but firmly rotated the screwdriver, avoiding a forwards force on the screwdriver. If alignment pins stick, the cam action is alternated back and forth between back corners of the plate. - heard a small but horrible click. Is there a special tool or technique for safely lifting the pallet bridge? Should everything be soaked in naphtha before beginning disassembly if there’s any sign of old oil gluing parts together? Thanks! Rob
    • You shared this test with me a few months back on a Hamilton project and so I had checked this watch to find the pins were still equally spaced. Their screw slots were undamaged and very tight hard to move so maybe no one has messed with them before. I can't work on it much today but I did measure the fork slot again and it seems like 0.44 is the right size. I measure the jewel that had been installed at just 0.42. would an undersized too narrow impulse jewel impact the impulse drastically? I ask because I have had it at a state where flipping the fork manually with a tool would unlock some of the time, but the balance was never capable of unlocking.
    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
×
×
  • Create New...