Jump to content

Movement holder made with 3D printer


Recommended Posts

New version of parametric movement holder, link HERE, updated based on feedback from other WRT members and removed a few bugs. I have printed in PLA+ and PETG and prints well, rendering below:

NewMHolder.thumb.png.5c2aa26f8c6d0f76d664c6ea9e82b9b0.png

I uploaded FreeCAD, step and .stl versions to printables web site as this seems to have replaced thingiverse as the go-to place for 3D models - opinions?

Note, parametric functionality only works in the FreeCAD file version

All you need to do is measure your movement outer diameter (OD) and then put this value into the model spreadsheet and it will generate a bespoke model of the holder to fit your movement that will look something like the one above. Depending on your settings the print time will be around 1 hour.

On 4/11/2021 at 7:27 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

I am attaching the Freecad file.  I use Freecad which is open-source software that is heavily supported and it is FREE.  Been using it for three years and love it.

 

STL file also attached, but it is not as useful because it is much harder to edit.

When I get some time, I will parameterize this for easier mods.

movement_holder 2.FCStd 23.36 kB · 15 downloads movement holder.stl 30.16 kB · 11 downloads

How do you upload the FCStd and stl files here? Whenever I try I get a warning box saying that the file format is not allowed.

 

Edited by Waggy
Clarification
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Waggy said:

How do you upload the FCStd and stl files here? Whenever I try I get a warning box saying that the file format is not allowed.

I don't know how I did it!!  It was a long time ago.  Maybe they changed the file type available.  Here's an idea.  Change the extension to ".jpg" and inform the reader to change it back to ".fcstd"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi, guys

I'm very interested in printing out this design as I've seen the orignals used on many occasions and I'm fed up with my movements popping out the standard Bergeon type so want to give this type a go 😀 

As I've never used this type before should the movement be a snug fit in the holder? Once you've measured the diameter of the movement do you put this exact value in the spreadsheet or increase it a little 🤔

Comments would be appreciated 👍  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Edited by Waggy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf 419.16 kB · 0 downloads

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

I like calibre dedicated holders, i have a strong interest in the Smiths brand and I have just joined a men in sheds group at the end of my road, i am sure my waffle helped me to jump the queue as initially he said there was a waiting list of around 50, should i feel guilty ?They have two 3d printers so that is going to be another learning curve for me.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waggy said:

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf 419.16 kB · 0 downloads

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Nice work.  In the last year, I have been servicing Accutron 218s.  I have the official Accutron hoder that provides electrical contact to the movement.  It is a pretty clever design.  There is a cut in the ring of the holder (shaped like a "C").  When in relaxed state, the holder is slightly smaller than the watch movement.  You spread the cut slightly and drop the movement in and release.  Very clean.  I have made 3D versions of this setup.  Have not explored using it generally for other movements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

 

 

I was just thinking, maybe a better solution for my design would be to have a standard base, and then use insert rings for each movement? This would reduce plastic used and print time as well as storage of the different holders?

Something like this:

 

IMG_20240424_105109.thumb.jpg.42b8d0448f168af34961451ad46d3979.jpg

Edited by Waggy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Waggy said:

 

I was just thinking, maybe a better solution for my design would be to have a standard base, and then use insert rings for each movement? This would reduce plastic used and print time as well as storage of the different holders?

Something like this:

 

IMG_20240424_105109.thumb.jpg.42b8d0448f168af34961451ad46d3979.jpg

Well, when you first posted some time back, I downloaded and ran it through my slicer to get a print time. A bit long for me. Your new idea would solve this. I am anxious to see your progress!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Done,

Here are the finished pictures:

This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂

signal-2024-04-24-183647_004.thumb.jpeg.7ea3dc43068fa2e326fc6b55be5fe87c.jpeg

From another angle:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_005.thumb.jpeg.512926499fc78b48397857b80f78b00f.jpeg

Here is the ring about to go into the base:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_003.thumb.jpeg.182ebf38bd4849f092475f4f59cfbfc5.jpeg

And finally the base and ring together:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_002.thumb.jpeg.a9f6cae25063b8c8d38eceb1e1186ca7.jpeg

Here it is next to a pen for scale:

signal-2024-04-24-183736_002.thumb.jpeg.24a6f5ac485c1d73d40cad6c344bf52e.jpeg

On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-39-06.thumb.png.3be4f68a8594bd4ac4cf2a28c8fb73f3.png

Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes).

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-51-12.thumb.png.546254255be3c660ca6f373bba551560.png

I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded:

Modular Movement Holder.pdf

Any feedback welcome!

 

 

I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂

 

Edited by Waggy
Typo
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Waggy said:

All Done,

Here are the finished pictures:

This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂

signal-2024-04-24-183647_004.thumb.jpeg.7ea3dc43068fa2e326fc6b55be5fe87c.jpeg

From another angle:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_005.thumb.jpeg.512926499fc78b48397857b80f78b00f.jpeg

Here is the ring about to go into the base:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_003.thumb.jpeg.182ebf38bd4849f092475f4f59cfbfc5.jpeg

And finally the base and ring together:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_002.thumb.jpeg.a9f6cae25063b8c8d38eceb1e1186ca7.jpeg

Here it is next to a pen for scale:

signal-2024-04-24-183736_002.thumb.jpeg.24a6f5ac485c1d73d40cad6c344bf52e.jpeg

On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-39-06.thumb.png.3be4f68a8594bd4ac4cf2a28c8fb73f3.png

Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes).

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-51-12.thumb.png.546254255be3c660ca6f373bba551560.png

I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded:

Modular Movement Holder.pdf 529.65 kB · 3 downloads

Any feedback welcome!

 

 

I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂

 

I'm curious if the base diameter could be changed so that it could be used with the hand press tool, which I believe is 31.0 mm.

RUIPAI-4-Pin-Automatic-Watch-Hand-Installing-and-Fitting-Tools-Watch-Needle-Installation-Tool-for-Watch_jpg__webp_80.thumb.jpg.9ebc33c777a6df63242e03a33d7e07fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

'm curious if the base diameter could be changed so that it could be used with the hand press tool, which I believe is 31.0 mm.

Good idea, working on it....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-04.thumb.png.638d00fde489a0d4d20fc4e4f4d4cb08.png

 

The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-29.thumb.png.e1485c150790958c919e131043fb8464.png

 

Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created?

Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files

Modular Movement Holder.pdf

Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files:

Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

Edited by Waggy
slight mod to design
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the insert ring for rectangular or elliptical movements:

Note that the length is the side with the stem cut out on the spreadsheet (in the picture below this is 15.15:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2511-41-55.thumb.png.958d69b67d28a0154c8a2e6a1dde431d.png

Here is the fake pdf file, again you need to convert to .zip after download to access the FreeCAD and 3mf files.

Rectangular insert disc.pdf

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Waggy said:

So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-04.thumb.png.638d00fde489a0d4d20fc4e4f4d4cb08.png

 

The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-29.thumb.png.e1485c150790958c919e131043fb8464.png

 

Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created?

Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files

Modular Movement Holder.pdf 247.9 kB · 1 download

Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files:

Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf 402.5 kB · 1 download

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

I'm going to give this a try today/tomorrow on my UTC33/Seiko 66, thanks!

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Waggy said:

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.

mh.thumb.jpg.bd79836f45a8828e19c81bda8a630733.jpg

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter

I discovered this last night when I printed my model, I'll try and tweak the design a little and re-post here

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi @Roll1ex, welcome to the forum. It's considered good practice to introduce yourself to the forum in this thread: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/forum/23-introduce-yourself-here/ But no worries. I don't have the spec sheet for the 15xx movements, but when I look at the 31xx information, it stands out that the endshake of the rotor should be between 0.01 and 0.03mm. That is LESS than the pallet fork and the lowest of all endshakes in the movement. Not exactly sure what you mean by that. The rotor itself is a unique part which doesn't have different heights. If you mean the height at which it is installed vis-a-vis the automatic bridge, then yes, that can be adjusted a bit via the two jewels that hold the rotor axle. Height differences vis-a-vis the bridge can also be caused by the strength with which the new axle is hammered/riveted into the rotor. And yes, that can be compensated a bit via the jewels.   This would probably indicate that the axle isn't perfectly perpendicular to the rotor. That could explain why the weight is closer to the rest of the movement at 9 o'clock -- it would then be furthest at 3 o'clock. That would be bad news. A new axle should then be installed... and properly this time.   As I wrote already, there is margin for adjustment via the jewels. As for the spring clip, the 15xx movements only seems to have one spring clip thickness (part 7911 - https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/2878_Rolex 1530 Pages 6-10.pdf). The later 31xx movments have several versions with different thicknesses. But there is a good chance that the clip is worn (=thinner than it should) and should then be replaced.   But, in conclusion, if the rotor hits the caseback in one particular postion, then my first suspicion is that the axle wasn't punched in at a perfect 90° angle. That must first be re-done correctly. No other fixes will be solving that problem. Furthermore, if the rotor "dings" against the caseback when the watch is shaken (but not in other situations), then there is likely also an issue of endshake (more an issue of the jewels) or lateral play (more likely the sping clip).      PS: by whom? Independent or RSC? 
    • Morning OH, absolutely not, that has never been the intention, there does seem to be a lot of emphasis placed on that point. Its only a contact storage location. Honestly OH , i cant get my head around why anyone wants to think why members would be pulled away from a forum that works so well. Your fear of losing the forum OH is exactly the same as everyone else's. Hopefully it will wont happen for a very long time, but not having a back up would mean that everything would be lost if it ever came to that. Scott has set that up for anyone that wants a failsafe,  if they are not comfortable with it then of course they dont need to participate. Its entirely of their free will.
    • Wow what a difference. As long as you are happy with the set up and it works for you it makes no odds. The belt is in line with the pulleys so no problem there.   No questions are silly on this site. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, (Rothwell). Originally from Allerton, Bradford. 
    • What is this going to be used for. I don't want to be part of anything that will drive traffic away from here.  
×
×
  • Create New...