Jump to content

Movement holder made with 3D printer


Recommended Posts

New version of parametric movement holder, link HERE, updated based on feedback from other WRT members and removed a few bugs. I have printed in PLA+ and PETG and prints well, rendering below:

NewMHolder.thumb.png.5c2aa26f8c6d0f76d664c6ea9e82b9b0.png

I uploaded FreeCAD, step and .stl versions to printables web site as this seems to have replaced thingiverse as the go-to place for 3D models - opinions?

Note, parametric functionality only works in the FreeCAD file version

All you need to do is measure your movement outer diameter (OD) and then put this value into the model spreadsheet and it will generate a bespoke model of the holder to fit your movement that will look something like the one above. Depending on your settings the print time will be around 1 hour.

On 4/11/2021 at 7:27 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

I am attaching the Freecad file.  I use Freecad which is open-source software that is heavily supported and it is FREE.  Been using it for three years and love it.

 

STL file also attached, but it is not as useful because it is much harder to edit.

When I get some time, I will parameterize this for easier mods.

movement_holder 2.FCStd 23.36 kB · 15 downloads movement holder.stl 30.16 kB · 11 downloads

How do you upload the FCStd and stl files here? Whenever I try I get a warning box saying that the file format is not allowed.

 

Edited by Waggy
Clarification
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Waggy said:

How do you upload the FCStd and stl files here? Whenever I try I get a warning box saying that the file format is not allowed.

I don't know how I did it!!  It was a long time ago.  Maybe they changed the file type available.  Here's an idea.  Change the extension to ".jpg" and inform the reader to change it back to ".fcstd"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi, guys

I'm very interested in printing out this design as I've seen the orignals used on many occasions and I'm fed up with my movements popping out the standard Bergeon type so want to give this type a go 😀 

As I've never used this type before should the movement be a snug fit in the holder? Once you've measured the diameter of the movement do you put this exact value in the spreadsheet or increase it a little 🤔

Comments would be appreciated 👍  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Edited by Waggy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf 419.16 kB · 0 downloads

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

I like calibre dedicated holders, i have a strong interest in the Smiths brand and I have just joined a men in sheds group at the end of my road, i am sure my waffle helped me to jump the queue as initially he said there was a waiting list of around 50, should i feel guilty ?They have two 3d printers so that is going to be another learning curve for me.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waggy said:

I use the exact OD and it fits in with a little force and a pleasing 'click' so it's snug and wont rotate within the holder, but that depends on how you have set up and calibrated your printer so you may need to play with the settings/dimensions a little to allow for any discrepancies in your printer calibration.

PS

I just finished (2 days ago) a new revision which automatically prints the movement OD on the bottom of the holder, I'll see if I can upload it here

Here is rev 4 remember to change the .pdf to .FCStd so it will open in FreeCAD - also you may need to install the LiberationSansBold font and tell FreeCAD where it lives on your PC, or change the font to something you already have on your system.

Para Movement Holder V4.pdf 419.16 kB · 0 downloads

Examples below:

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-29-905_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Screenshot_2024-04-23-14-57-15-461_org.mozilla.firefox.jpg

Nice work.  In the last year, I have been servicing Accutron 218s.  I have the official Accutron hoder that provides electrical contact to the movement.  It is a pretty clever design.  There is a cut in the ring of the holder (shaped like a "C").  When in relaxed state, the holder is slightly smaller than the watch movement.  You spread the cut slightly and drop the movement in and release.  Very clean.  I have made 3D versions of this setup.  Have not explored using it generally for other movements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

 

 

I was just thinking, maybe a better solution for my design would be to have a standard base, and then use insert rings for each movement? This would reduce plastic used and print time as well as storage of the different holders?

Something like this:

 

IMG_20240424_105109.thumb.jpg.42b8d0448f168af34961451ad46d3979.jpg

Edited by Waggy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Waggy said:

 

I was just thinking, maybe a better solution for my design would be to have a standard base, and then use insert rings for each movement? This would reduce plastic used and print time as well as storage of the different holders?

Something like this:

 

IMG_20240424_105109.thumb.jpg.42b8d0448f168af34961451ad46d3979.jpg

Well, when you first posted some time back, I downloaded and ran it through my slicer to get a print time. A bit long for me. Your new idea would solve this. I am anxious to see your progress!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Done,

Here are the finished pictures:

This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂

signal-2024-04-24-183647_004.thumb.jpeg.7ea3dc43068fa2e326fc6b55be5fe87c.jpeg

From another angle:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_005.thumb.jpeg.512926499fc78b48397857b80f78b00f.jpeg

Here is the ring about to go into the base:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_003.thumb.jpeg.182ebf38bd4849f092475f4f59cfbfc5.jpeg

And finally the base and ring together:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_002.thumb.jpeg.a9f6cae25063b8c8d38eceb1e1186ca7.jpeg

Here it is next to a pen for scale:

signal-2024-04-24-183736_002.thumb.jpeg.24a6f5ac485c1d73d40cad6c344bf52e.jpeg

On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-39-06.thumb.png.3be4f68a8594bd4ac4cf2a28c8fb73f3.png

Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes).

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-51-12.thumb.png.546254255be3c660ca6f373bba551560.png

I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded:

Modular Movement Holder.pdf

Any feedback welcome!

 

 

I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂

 

Edited by Waggy
Typo
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Waggy said:

All Done,

Here are the finished pictures:

This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂

signal-2024-04-24-183647_004.thumb.jpeg.7ea3dc43068fa2e326fc6b55be5fe87c.jpeg

From another angle:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_005.thumb.jpeg.512926499fc78b48397857b80f78b00f.jpeg

Here is the ring about to go into the base:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_003.thumb.jpeg.182ebf38bd4849f092475f4f59cfbfc5.jpeg

And finally the base and ring together:

signal-2024-04-24-183647_002.thumb.jpeg.a9f6cae25063b8c8d38eceb1e1186ca7.jpeg

Here it is next to a pen for scale:

signal-2024-04-24-183736_002.thumb.jpeg.24a6f5ac485c1d73d40cad6c344bf52e.jpeg

On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-39-06.thumb.png.3be4f68a8594bd4ac4cf2a28c8fb73f3.png

Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes).

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2418-51-12.thumb.png.546254255be3c660ca6f373bba551560.png

I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded:

Modular Movement Holder.pdf 529.65 kB · 3 downloads

Any feedback welcome!

 

 

I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂

 

I'm curious if the base diameter could be changed so that it could be used with the hand press tool, which I believe is 31.0 mm.

RUIPAI-4-Pin-Automatic-Watch-Hand-Installing-and-Fitting-Tools-Watch-Needle-Installation-Tool-for-Watch_jpg__webp_80.thumb.jpg.9ebc33c777a6df63242e03a33d7e07fa.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

'm curious if the base diameter could be changed so that it could be used with the hand press tool, which I believe is 31.0 mm.

Good idea, working on it....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-04.thumb.png.638d00fde489a0d4d20fc4e4f4d4cb08.png

 

The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-29.thumb.png.e1485c150790958c919e131043fb8464.png

 

Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created?

Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files

Modular Movement Holder.pdf

Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files:

Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

Edited by Waggy
slight mod to design
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the insert ring for rectangular or elliptical movements:

Note that the length is the side with the stem cut out on the spreadsheet (in the picture below this is 15.15:

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2511-41-55.thumb.png.958d69b67d28a0154c8a2e6a1dde431d.png

Here is the fake pdf file, again you need to convert to .zip after download to access the FreeCAD and 3mf files.

Rectangular insert disc.pdf

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Waggy said:

So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-04.thumb.png.638d00fde489a0d4d20fc4e4f4d4cb08.png

 

The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.

Screenshotfrom2024-04-2508-27-29.thumb.png.e1485c150790958c919e131043fb8464.png

 

Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created?

Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files

Modular Movement Holder.pdf 247.9 kB · 1 download

Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files:

Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf 402.5 kB · 1 download

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

I'm going to give this a try today/tomorrow on my UTC33/Seiko 66, thanks!

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Waggy said:

However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?

I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.

mh.thumb.jpg.bd79836f45a8828e19c81bda8a630733.jpg

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going for an AS movement - the general layout, screw/jewel positions are similar.  
    • I haven't yet but I will take it out tonight! Thank you. Will post pics of dial side tonight too.
    • Did you have a look under the ballance? Often the movement maker/number is hidden there.
    • I wonder if 9415 is based on a base oil of 941? it's interesting what questions bring and the tech sheet answers it's the viscosity of the base oil. Then the impact? There is something we're missing here for that which would have a big influence on all of the house image above is 9514 image below is 941.then always interesting when specifications do not exactly agree? They ledge above for 941 indicates 110 viscosity but the image off the spec sheet is slightly less but I guess close enough   my understanding of the concern of too much 9415 is as we know the loss of amplitude. But why do we have a loss of amplitude? So impact it's basically oil should be very slippery. But what about non-impact? Like the edges of the escape wheel? Another thing that comes to play here is the shape of the escape wheel itself. Notice on the last a more vintage escape wheel with just a flat surface whereas the modern escape wheels usually made out of steel versus grass much much thinner their contact areas greatly been reduced and sometimes I think there even slightly curved. So is it conceivable at everything that isn't a flat surface on impact is going to be sticky? So this is where the shape of the escape wheel will have a big impact literally on how slippery things are. Oh and for all of you obsessed with worrying about too much 9415 I never worry about it because typically I'm doing pocket watches and it doesn't seem to be an issue at all. on the other hand I'm much more concerned about a watch that keeps time for 24 hours as opposed to the concern of the group of keeping amplitude for 24 hours. Then yes some pocket watches have steel escape wheels and do look like the escape wheel on the right.   
    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
×
×
  • Create New...