Jump to content

Did Rolex release this watch like this?


Recommended Posts

After I noticed this messed up rehaut I was told by the seller that this was a watch straight from a Rolex AD showcase and it came from Rolex looking just like this. hmmm I called New York, Rolex inc and ask to speak to someone about their quality control ie workmanship and was transferred to a gentleman who was very polite and after discussing my rehaut he said Rolex would never release a watch in that condition. Their Quality Control would never pass this watch. Now my question is how could this rehaut get messed up? Does anybody have any ideas how this could have happened. To me it appears to have been held some sort of holder and twisted because all the scratches go to the right. Any ideas from your experience with watch repair how this could have happened would be appreciated. FYI I did return the watch and got my money back but not without a hassle from the seller, who insisted this was the way it came from Rolex. At this point I am just curious.

017.JPG

018.JPG

019.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there, the introduction of the engraved rehaut was actually an action taken to make it more difficult for counterfeit watches to be instantly recognized, as this type of engraving on the Rolex watch is extremely precise and quite difficult to do. Of course, this worked in the beginning, but counterfeiters soon caught on. They have a hard time reaching the same level of perfection in the engraving as Rolex has, but today, it is still common to see fake watches have engraved rehauts.Glad you got your money back image.thumb.png.f9e09252204af73b358e939d63d9a40a.png

Edited by Graziano
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tarrda said:

After I noticed this messed up rehaut I was told by the seller that this was a watch straight from a Rolex AD showcase and it came from Rolex looking just like this. hmmm I called New York, Rolex inc and ask to speak to someone about their quality control ie workmanship and was transferred to a gentleman who was very polite and after discussing my rehaut he said Rolex would never release a watch in that condition. Their Quality Control would never pass this watch. Now my question is how could this rehaut get messed up? Does anybody have any ideas how this could have happened. To me it appears to have been held some sort of holder and twisted because all the scratches go to the right. Any ideas from your experience with watch repair how this could have happened would be appreciated. FYI I did return the watch and got my money back but not without a hassle from the seller, who insisted this was the way it came from Rolex. At this point I am just curious.

017.JPG

018.JPG

019.JPG

Absolutely not. It has to be a copy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Did you purchase this is a new watch? Then Rolex would've never of let this leave the factory looking like this.

 

It was through a Grey Market dealer in Calif, they advertised it as new, from the AD showcase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, tarrda said:

It was through a Grey Market dealer in Calif, they advertised it as new, from the AD showcase

The problem with gray market? Conceivably it's exactly what they say it is but since it was not that is an issue. If it had come from an real dealer it would've had warranty paperwork. You could a send it back to Rolex for warranty repair and it would've been fixed. Or the dealer themselves would have the ability to fix the problem. That is providing this really was a legitimate Rolex and not something that either totally fake or modified changed whatever just to sell the thing. Gray conceivably means the seller does not have to tell the truth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things that was bothering me with this discussion is the engraving looks good. Even though I just said the engraving looks good the rest of it looks like total crap. It absolutely positively would've never of left Rolex looking like this. not only that anybody who looked at this would reject it.

I looked up the term graymarket supposedly it it's legit new items sold at a big discount for variety reasons usually don't have a warranty. But watches are interesting there sealed up how do you know it's legit? How do you know if it has the right movement. Then if you go to vintage they start mixing and matching bits and pieces to give you a watch that's probably basically totally crap. Or refinishing watches to look like new some things are too good to be true for a reason.

Because the engraving looks good I was curious I emailed a friend the photographs. He's taken classes given by Rolex now retired and that included the classes on spotting counterfeit Rolex watches. I'm pasting his answer below in any case returning the watch was a good thing.

"this looks like an example of a mediocre case refinish on a reconditioned watch, not new product. Perhaps the original crystal was smashed which would have scratched up the dial ring and top of the crystal seat. If a coarse grit was used to refinish the case it would end up looking like this. The white stuff looks like lint from the cloth/paper towel used to clean it off. The engraving itself doesn't look that bad.I would vote for bad refinish, rather than counterfeit."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...