Jump to content

Watch movement I.D


gary17

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

This is a tawek watch from the 40s. There is not much on the web about them. What little bit i did source said tawek at this period use phenix movement cal 130.

The mainspring and the winding stem were broke so i ordered the parts from cousins. 

Ranfft says     Zf1221, 1.50 x 9.0 x 0.11 x 260mm

cousins said    1.50x.11x300x9  which is the one they sell for that movement.

Well the spring and winding stem do not fit.

Plus just dug the old mainspring out of the bin and its only 180 mm in length.

So i presume this is not a phenix 130.

As i always say and mean any assistance greatly received.

pocs below its just tagged together now but its all there. (mostly)

I can take more if needed.

cheers

gary

IMG_20201216_193228.jpg

IMG_20201216_193236.jpg

IMG_20201216_193241.jpg

IMG_20201216_193242.jpg

IMG_20201216_193257.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you're still waiting on an answer let's look at the keyless works for the 130 from Bestfit*...

image.png.18f705c4f668bd9390211c8a4f598205.png

Obviously your setting lever spring is broken but even with that in mind there's not a good match on the shape of parts. But there's a 250...

image.png.e92efb423d92115f7309f4ca888594fc.png

... and that I'm sure you'll agree looks a lot more promising. The thing is you've embarked on a 10.5''' journey with the 130 and the 250 is only a 9.75'''. So let's start there. Do you want to confirm the size of the movement you have ... is it a 10.5''' or 9.75''' diameter? I can relay more information once we know we're not going down a blind alley.

*I know you ask a fair few questions on this forum so are obviously doing a lot of activity and on a large variety of movements. Worth getting a Bestfit catalogue as it's a mine of information. Under a tenner: https://mccawcompany.com/product/bestfit-encyclopedia-books-111-111a-digital-download-pdf-version/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad I could help.

Oh I see. FYI: you'd done the good work in identifying it as a Phenix (crescent with star) which of course cuts down the search parameters. I opened my Bestfit PDF and just did a search for 'phenix' and then next-next-next until reaching the keyless works silhouettes. When it was clear it wasn't the 130 the 250 shone out. And that would explain the shorter mainspring too.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gary17 said:

I have the bestfit book but did not know what to search for and it is a damn big volume to go through page by page.

Learning the secrets in the bestfit book is not a Quick learning process it takes some time.

I would initially just thumb through it see what it has to offer. Then if you're thumbing through you can combine the bonus hidden gems like for instance PDF page 795. A entire section on installing a watch crown. There's all kinds of stuff like that hidden through the book.

Then for your example in the beginning of the book they have the symbols so you can look up your symbol and get a company name. That helps to narrow things down considerably. Otherwise with the size you just go to the fingerprint section and figure out what you have. Fortunately up until modern times the set bridges are all unique.

Well worthwhile taking the time to learn.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2020 at 11:39 AM, WatchMaker said:

*I know you ask a fair few questions on this forum so are obviously doing a lot of activity and on a large variety of movements. Worth getting a Bestfit catalogue as it's a mine of information. Under a tenner: https://mccawcompany.com/product/bestfit-encyclopedia-books-111-111a-digital-download-pdf-version/

Thanks for the Bestfit catalogue link, I was looking for that for a while when I read people mentioning them to identify movements and parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...