Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey guys, so I’m having a problem with potentially the balance and or escape wheel. Did a complete coa on this movement. Also replaced the upper escape wheel jewel/spring/setting. Now the watch runs but, on the vibrograph shows a lot of time loss. When I press down lightly on the balance bridge a bit it stops, and have to turn it to get it going again. Been stressing me out. Checked all the pivots and jewels and everything seems fine. Any and all info would be very much appreciated!

Edited by Yallabye
Posted

Since you replaced that upper (in the plate?) shock setting you probably pressed it too far and now you have no end shake at all. You need a tiny bit of shake there. Less than the train, but more than zero. 

Was it a Rolex part, or generic?

Posted
30 minutes ago, Tudor said:

Since you replaced that upper (in the plate?) shock setting you probably pressed it too far and now you have no end shake at all. You need a tiny bit of shake there. Less than the train, but more than zero. 

Was it a Rolex part, or generic?

There is a bit of endshake. Is it supposed to be flush on the underside or have a very tiny bit of lippage? It is all genuine. 

Posted

 

45 minutes ago, Yallabye said:

. When I press down lightly on the balance bridge a bit it stops, and have to turn it to get it going again. 

So you got some or little endshake,  just as a test: loosen cock screw 1.5 turn see if oscil speeds up.

 Do you see any shelac keepin pallets put? 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 

So you got some or little endshake,  just as a test: loosen cock screw 1.5 turn see if oscil speeds up.

 Do you see any shelac keepin pallets put? 

 

 

You beat me to it, while I was compsing. fast typer.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 

So you got some or little endshake,  just as a test: loosen cock screw 1.5 turn see if oscil speeds up.

 Do you see any shelac keepin pallets put? 

 

 

Sorry can you please explain what the cock screw is and “shelac keepin pallets” 

Posted
2 hours ago, Yallabye said:

Sorry can you please explain what the cock screw is and “shelac keepin pallets” 

Cock screw is the one that holds the cock down on mainplate, in cases you suspect end stones might be pushing on pivot end( no or very little end shake) you can releive such possible pressure on end stones by loosening the said screw, if the are no end stones, the jewel itself can be pushing on shoulder seat of the pivot.

Shelac is the stuff that acts like glue but wont hurt the base metal over time, it is used on fork pallets jewels to keep them from moving in fork slot, nearly all petrolium base cleaning solutions dissolve shelac rendering pallet jewels loose to move in the fork slot, which ruins escapement at the pallets and can be a cause for a host of escapement disfunctions.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Yallabye said:

There is a bit of endshake. Is it supposed to be flush on the underside or have a very tiny bit of lippage? It is all genuine. 

The amount of exposure doesn’t matter- the end shake does. Try Joe’s idea of loosening the cock screw and see if things improve. If so, you may need to press the setting out a hair. 

Did you happen to do any hair spring work? At rest, is the roller in line with the pallet fork (straight line between balance pivot, fork and escape wheel)?

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 

So you got some or little endshake,  just as a test: loosen cock screw 1.5 turn see if oscil speeds up.

 Do you see any shelac keepin pallets put? 

 

 

Ok so Adjusting the cock screw did help a lot but it is still about 1 minute 45secs losing still. I am going to press out the upper escape wheel setting and see if that makes it better, I’m hoping 

Posted
17 hours ago, Yallabye said:

Also replaced the upper escape wheel jewel/spring/setting

out of curiosity why did you replace the entire setting?

13 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Cock screw is the one that holds the cock down on mainplate, in cases you suspect end stones might be pushing on pivot end( no or very little end shake) you can releive such possible pressure on end stones by loosening the said screw, if the are no end stones, the jewel itself can be pushing on shoulder seat of the pivot.

normally the above answer would be fine except this is a Rolex watch. Rolex is obsessed with end shake so often times they will have procedures to make that adjustment easily especially on the balance bridge.  rather than explaining the procedure I'm attaching a section out of the manual. You'll notice there's a screw specific for adjusting the end shake. If somebody had zero idea what that screw was for an rotated it that would be the problem.

Rolex 3035 regulating screw for balance bridge.JPG

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

out of curiosity why did you replace the entire setting?

normally the above answer would be fine except this is a Rolex watch. Rolex is obsessed with end shake so often times they will have procedures to make that adjustment easily especially on the balance bridge.  rather than explaining the procedure I'm attaching a section out of the manual. You'll notice there's a screw specific for adjusting the end shake. If somebody had zero idea what that screw was for an rotated it that would be the problem.

Rolex 3035 regulating screw for balance bridge.JPG

I replaced the entire setting partly because I was lazy of replacing just the spring itself because whoever worked on it before had broke half of the spring and left it like that so I decided it was easier just to replace the whole thing instead.

 

I adjust the regulating screw for the balance bridge, and also pushed the setting  in a bit more so the escape wheel has less endshake and seemed to make a huge difference. Within 10 secs.

Posted
2 hours ago, Yallabye said:

Ok so Adjusting the cock screw did help a lot but it is still about 1 minute 45secs losing still. I am going to press out the upper escape wheel setting and see if that makes it better, I’m hoping 

Checking end shake on escape arbour will suffice. You would get zero end shake, if end stones are pushing on escape pivots.

Removal of end stones so to leave escape arbour unbound might create new problem, that is; you want escape wheel and fork pallet jewels level (both in same plane).

You have high percision gears in this piece, so power transfer through out the gear train should feel effortless. 

 Thanks to john's post which shows the design provides an end shake adjustment screw.

Good luck.

 



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thinking of best fit did we ever look at fingerprinting this movement? Then identification of watches? This actually comes up a lot on this group of people especially with older watches thinking they're going to identify some vintage no name whatever and know they're not going to. But even more important books like bestfit only exist to supply spare parts. This means the movement had to have been made in sufficient quantities and exported out of Japan for a company like bestfit to supply spare parts. So simplistic rule would be unless parts were readily available cross reference books to identify it for finding parts will not exist. One of things I was curious about I went back to the first page and part of the problem is your watches so much older than the one that launched this discussion if you look at the original posting picture it's a screwless balance with a shock protected system yours is much much older. Then of course older also brings up the problem of parts identification books because they were really only made in specific time spans and do not cover an infinite quantity of years unfortunately although bestfit Did have some older books but if I remember right I don't think Seiko shows up even until basically the last of their books because it comes back to they weren't exported out of Japan insufficient quantities for anyone to care about spare parts unfortunately    
    • I'm working on a 602 that has date. Well the bridge has Cal 602 on it. That was a complete pig. I ended up laying mine in place and hoping for the best! I didn't want to hav e you keep going over those darn pivots - painful. Well it all seems to have worked so....... perhaps I was lucky?   And thanks so much for that photo. After disassembling I found my footage completely out of ficus. Lesson to myself (and anyone else) don't use a GoPro less than 30cm (at which distance the watch is in the distance anyway).
    • Job done. After a lot of fiddling and testing  I used this method . I purchased the correct size glass from eBay. To drill the hole I used a diamond core drill bit . I have a small pillar  drill press and submerged the glass in water inside of a jar lid with a cork mat underneath the glass. I drilled very slowly and it was successful but it did chip a bit but it’s not visible. A very happy customer..          
    • I've not bought a replacement mainspring before. According to my digital calipers the broken spring in my Lancashire Watch Co. Pocket Watch is 2.4mm wide & 2.0mm thick & the barrel is 16mm diameter.  The nearest Cousins has to this (GR6573) only differs in the barrel width - it's 15.5mm . Is this difference significant? Also, the old spring has a pin across the outer end to secure it in the barrel but the Cousins info implies it's "a normal bridle" (whatever that means) rather than a "T" (which I assume is how my old spring is categorised). Help, please!
    • Another option is to an old piece of clock mainspring, if you have some thick enough.
×
×
  • Create New...