Jump to content

Help Identifing Age of a Waterbury Mantel Clock


FrankCarpenter

Recommended Posts

Hello

I have tried to find information regarding the clock I recently received but have found nothing but a couple of images.  My clock is a wood case with faux marbling effect in brown tones.  There is a label on the back of the clock stating SAREPTA Waterbury Clock Company. Also on the label are three address one for NY, one for Chicago and one for Glasgow Scotland.  The number 4283 is stamped on the back of the clock case.  The entire back of the clock comes off to reveal the clock works.  The actual works are small in size.  The clock strikes on the hour and half hour.  There are no identifying markings on the clock dial.  The time regulator is located in the number 12 on the dial, however, the pendulum also has an rolling thread in the middle of it. Not sure the pendulum is original.   Any help dating my clock would be great.   Also the brass on the face and the feet is very tarnished. Does it hurt the value cleaning the brass?

Thank you.

clock5.jpg

clock4.jpg

clock3.jpg

clock2.jpg

clock1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your clock is dated around 1895 because of the stamp on the back plate and not a label in side of the case. When it comes to polishing, myself I think it will look odd, you will be removing years of its life away. People like the patina of antiques they don't expect to see them looking like new. Unless you decide to completely restore the whole thing I would leave it alone. I also would say that pendulum is correct. 

Here is the link where I obtained the date see if you agree.

  https://botspro.com/labelstrademarks.php?lm=Waterbury

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  There is plenty of information to be had on the waterbury/ansonia and jerome web sites. They are all linked.

Like Old Hippy says don't go bulling up the clock like new as it will spoil the clock, It picked up all the bruises and patina in life and to remove it all is an injustice to the clock as well to quote Old Hippy "it will look odd". So clean it polish it with care, Its a nick old clock and looked after will run another 100 years no problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Your clock is dated around 1895 because of the stamp on the back plate and not a label in side of the case. When it comes to polishing, myself I think it will look odd, you will be removing years of its life away. People like the patina of antiques they don't expect to see them looking like new. Unless you decide to completely restore the whole thing I would leave it alone. I also would say that pendulum is correct. 

Here is the link where I obtained the date see if you agree.

  https://botspro.com/labelstrademarks.php?lm=Waterbury

 

When I try to go to the website in that link Firefox prevents it and I get this warning screen....

EvbxK1R.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I had the same using Chrome but it is OK to use. I wouldn't post a link if it was dodgy.  

Ok, was looking for the Ansonia link. I have this Ansonia cast iron clock. I got it about 55 years ago. The case was very rusty and as an apprentice in a scientific instrument manufacturers at the time I had access to stove enamelling, so stripped the case and re-finished it.....zQczflR.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Looks good. 

Bearing in mind that the re-enamelling was done about 55 years ago I think that anyone looking at it would be hard pressed to tell that it wasn't the original finish...;). Any idea of the exact age? My thoughts were that it was around 1900.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

You will need to look at the label for the date. Here is another link for you and its safe.:D

http://www.antiqueansoniaclocks.com/ansonia-clock-labels.php

Thanks, very interesting, but I have no recollection of ever seeing a paper label with the clock.:(

Some close up pics which might throw some light on it.....

Movement.....

ohZcZ2Q.jpg

XTo7JcC.jpg

5B4F0Qa.jpg

rlZOLXD.jpg

 

And dial..

swHK66r.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...