Jump to content

Timex indiglo


Recommended Posts

Hello all,

A friend's father in law passed a few days ago. His daughter would like to get his watch working again. The back cover is missing. I have no clue what it is or what diameter cover I need to close it back up. These are the pictures she sent me. I will have the watch tomorrow possibly, but I doubt I will get any more info that what is the pic. Any help would be appreciated.

 

Best Regards,

Nick

 

 

118401225_3720861147925239_7114266157139520082_n.jpg

118031970_5265192513554211_298144963252764989_n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks like your standard timex m905 movement with no spacer ring, if that's the case then you're probably looking at ballpark 35.3mm case like you'll see on the smaller easy readers. Around here they are pretty common in thrift shops (and in ebay lots), not as popular as the 38mm/40mm timexes which do get picked up.

Rear snap caseback 33.2mm OD (outer flange), 31.7mm OD of the inner ring, at least on the one I have here. Movement also easily swappable from donor if that one doesn't work, 35mm-40mm (and up?) no date and date analog timexes use the m905.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...