Jump to content

Bulova set o matic


Recommended Posts

anybody have any experience with a bulova set o matic setting mechanism? I bought one and the movement is in excellent shape, however, the final pullout of the staff isnt there and i cannot adjust the hands.  Replaced staff? Synched incorrectly?  I found a diagram of assembly online but wanted input from here.

Thanks.  Cheers

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this an AS-2066 you're dealing with.

If the stem (I know you use the term 'staff') isn't moving as it should and allowing you to move to a position to change the hands then clearly there must be a problem with the keyless works in some way. 

A good bet would then to look at, say, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM5gD6PQm5Y around the 13:30 mark and compare where your keyless works are compromised.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes gentlemen i know its the keyless work that is causing the issue.  Its a 1974 11BSACB. 

There seems to be a replaced part from another movement.  Its the setting lever or the set bridge.  Im unsure.

I ordered the same calibre junker to see if i can find out whats the difference between the two might be.  

I investigated mine for quite a while today.

Set bridge has another bridge attached on the bottom with a series of gears.  This should contact a wheel (2nd wheel) that has a slip fit pinion on it.  This pinion moves the hands.  Its a rather ingenious design but the STEM doesnt want to pull out to a third notch.

As far as i can tell its got an incorrect part.  Like i said above.

20200724_160242.jpg

Edited by Orologi67
misspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you will see from the picture the set bridge has a hole at the 6.30 position.  Thats the cam that should fall diagonally left to interact with the slip fit pinion under that pivot hole you can see just slightly below the hole in the bridge.

The series of cams under the bridge is called the rocking bar.  There is a prong coming off this that interacts with the setting lever.

If i place that prong under the bottom pin on the lever the STEM will not move from winding mode (fully imbedded) which as i see it thats the way its supposed to be positioned.

If i place that prong above the pin the STEM will pull out one time.  This sets day and date.

So im back to square one until the junker arrives such that i can analyze and hopefully steal a part.

Thanks for your help.  In the future i will refer to it as a STEM and always give the calibre

Edited by Orologi67
misspelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok.  The long story.  The setting bridge tension arm/spring with two notches that interacts with the setting lever.  The setting lever's pin is supposed to pass the bottom hump for the 2nd pull out of the stem which sets the time (see above pics).  Even after cleaning and oil the setting lever pin just would not pass that second larger hump which is so much larger than the first that it in fact looks like a stop. 

i ordered, as i said, a 20 buck junker, thinking i had a wrong part on mine.  On the junker the the setting bridge's setting lever spring was snapped off.  My suspiscions were founded.

So i took off the bridge on this bulova and got a fine grade vallorbe file and slightly rounded off the bottom hump.  Then i polished that curve with sandpaper.  Then i washed it.  Reinstalled it. Lubed it.  Put the stem back in and Voilá! It finally pulled out twice and now the hands can be set.

Im a clockrepairman learning to repair watches.  Rule #1 in clock repair is never take away metal from a piece.  But this really is an issue of that hump being designed ever so slightly too large.

Im sure customers were snapping stems and breaking setting springs trying to set the hands on this bulova series.

And i do apologize if my terminology is not to watchmaker specs.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...