Jump to content

Bezel Removal Problem


Recommended Posts

I tried removing the crystal with air pressure but was unsuccessful. I'm beginning to wonder if some of these inexpensive quartz watches are meant to be disposable and are unrepairable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lawren5 said:

Yes, the retainer was taken out and does not appear in the photo.

Are you sure that there isn't a steel retaining ring sprung into the case? If it is, then, with the stem out, you should be able to rotate it a bit using the slot that the stem went through....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the stem removed,  where the slot in the case is, can you see the edge of the aluminium dial? If it doesn't project further than the edge of the slot it may just be a tight fit in the case........When magnified, the picture appears to show vertical scratch marks in the inner ring, suggesting that the edge of the dial made them on insertion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a good photo but no, the edge of the dial is not visible. The dial is about 1.3 mm larger in diameter than the opening and there is considerable side-to-side play in the dial with the movement retainer removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Lawren5 said:

It's not a good photo but no, the edge of the dial is not visible. The dial is about 1.3 mm larger in diameter than the opening and there is considerable side-to-side play in the dial with the movement retainer removed.

Looks like you are going to have to lift the bezel with a very thin knife. Try adjacent to one of the lugs, you should be able to get some leverage there if you can start to get a blade in.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...