Jump to content

Case vs dial numbers


Recommended Posts

Good day fellow forum folks!!,  I have a seiko question. It’s actually a bunch of questions. 
 

i know the first 4 numbers are the caliber code, ie 6139, but the last 4 on the dial often differ from the case back. Sometimes by only 1 number but sometime by the entire sequence.  Would the first be considered the dial code, containing  information like date, color, etc. and the other code information on the actual case, style, origin, etc?  Would an extreme difference in the 2 codes indicate a swapped case back?

 Am I correct in believing that a interpretation of the serial number will only yield the date of manufacture of the CASE, as well as the region but nothing really to do with the dial?

i received a bunch of watches strictly intended for fixer uppers and while 2 of them have 6139 dials, the movements are 6138B’s. My inventory begins to runneth over;).

 Anyway, thanks for any insight!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly the dial number must differ from the case number, as there are many possible variations of the first. There is no coded information, it's just a code, to know if it's right or wrong one have to know all the variations made on a same case.

The serial number only embeds the manufacturing date, nothing about the place of manufacturing, that may (or may be not) indicated on dial, case-back (back or inside), rotor, etc.

If you read or ask on a specialized Seiko forum like SCWF you would meet the most knowledge with very focused collectors, able to go over in excruciating detail over that kind of things.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm currently 3D printing a new basket and trays for my Pearl machine - I printed one last week in PETG material and it worked well at first. I had taken a calibration cube and soaked it in old cleaning fluid for 8 weeks and then measured it, and there was no discernable swelling or shrinkage and the cube seemed mechanically intact. All went well after the cleaning cycles and then onto the drying cycle..... that's when things went awry. The heat was more than I was expecting and the basket and individual trays warped and deformed, I later found out that PETG is rated to 65°C working temperature (PLA = 54°C) I am now trying to print from nylon (working temperature = +/- 100°C, depending on the specific blend) - but it is extremely difficult to print with, my third attempt is chugging away now while I am at work - hopefully I don't go home to a ball of wool like last time! 
    • It is possible to true the pearl basket to run better takes a good hour of filing though.
    • Yes, the general pat is this. On my diagram the points where the springs rises and levels are marked with red circles. This is only to show on all pictures (the ones that doesn't show this points as they are seen only from aside, not from above) where this points are. On You pictures, the pont where the spring rises is not marked. The point where it levels is marked with A. The point B is where the change in radius should start, but there is sharp bend there which should not be that sharp.
    • I agree, very minimalist dial,  but then the diamond. The 1973 R has a black dial and gold case and is similar in layout. But on the MyBulova site there really is nothing else like it...
    • This is such an odd Bulova. Off of the top of my head the only other mechanical Bulova that I can think of that has the 'Bulova' logo as an hour marker is the Golden Clipper 'J' (there must be others), one of my favorite dials. And then it has a solitary diamond, which is not unusual with Bulova, but paired with the 'Bulova' hour marker, that only leaves two quarter hour markers, and I can't think of another Bulova that has only two hour markers like that. You do you Bulova, no conformity here!
×
×
  • Create New...