Jump to content

Komandirskie Anyone?


Denis

Recommended Posts

Bought to fix up. Crown and crystal wrong, Lume is dead. Advertised as in need of attention, only work for 6 hours. I thought mainspring is gone. Turned out to be working just fine. Power reserve 33 hours (Originally must be something like 38, if memory serves me right.)

Gained 1 minute (roughly) after one week. Can't complain, at about £12. And most importantly gold plating is very decent.

There is something magical about a watch older than yourself.....

...or is it just me?

post-586-0-56374500-1419177351_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys!
Yes, this surprise keeps surprisingly good time.
Lovely scuba dude there, JC. Is that Jurgens bund pad/strap?
I see amphibia in my future too. During my hunt for this watch i grew to strongly dislike any sort of plating. Very hard to get plated case of that vintage in good condition.

Denis
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Denis,

The strap is one the was made by Jstraps in California. The huy who makes them (Johnny Torrez) constructs them to order, and yes it is a bundt-style strap. I love the "scuba dude" and want to get another Bocok--maybe a chronograph. I have only a few plated watches because they aren't as collectible and it is difficult to get them and keep them in good condition.  Thanks for posting!

 

JC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, JC. Vostok doesn't make chronograph movements. (As far as i know.)

There was joint Russian-Italian joint venture that saw marriage of Poljot 3133 movement and Vostok stainless steel case, marketed as Vostok Komandirskie chronograph. Modern Vostok chronographs use quartz movement from Miyota.

I know, very disappointing. Poljot 3133 has a bit of history of its own.

 

Denis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Denis,

Yes you are correct! I do think it was the Poljot I was thinking of--certainy another great Russian make. Yes it was definietly a Poljot aviator chronograph I had in mind! You seem knowledgeable in Russian watches. Have you overhauled any? I am thinking of cleaning/oiling my Boktok but its still a little early and its is showing no sgins of needing it. I was wondering if they differ significantly from comparable Swiss or German brands?

 

JC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi JC.

Have you overhauled any?

No, I didn't. I'm afraid all my knowledge is purely theoretical. I sift through a ton of information about russian watches when i was looking for this one. And now, when it turned out working so well, I have NO motivation to butcher it. As you gathered by now, i'm in no position to tell you if they differ significantly from comparable Swiss or German brands. (I know that some vintage movements are modifications or copies of movements of Swiss, American, German or French origin. But thats history.)

 

Apart from obvious reasons like repair and due service. If it shows no sign of needing attention, then i see no reason for cleaning/oiling it... Except, for pure curiosity. (Of course i can understand that.)

Factory general recommendation (from a catch-all document, not a particular model) is once in 3-4 years. Check "water-tightness" every 2-3 years and "to change gaskets as required". But i think they are conservative about it.
Interestingly, "Automatic watch, worn daily should be manually wound once a week (20-30 turns of crown clockwise)."
Unfortunately i couldn't find any factory service notes. Russian sources refer mainly to experience and soviet watchmaking books.
However, this link might be of interest to you:
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f54/vostok-2416b-service-notes-240805.html

Hope that helps

Denis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...