Jump to content

Hairspring help - how do I make corrections to overcoil?


mikepilk

Recommended Posts

My least favourite task is trying to correct hairsprings, especially overcoils ... and my next project has that problem.

I'm putting together a Universal cal 267 and found the hairspring distorted. I've got it looking fairly flat, and not too bad 'in the round'.

The problem is the overcoil. The stud is too high, and I end up with coned coils when it's mounted.

To get the overcoil parallel, I need to start by bending down at 'A', and then probably another correction half way to the stud.

How do I make up/down bends on an overcoil? Is it by using two pairs of tweezers and twisting, as you would fix a twist in the main spring.
In which case, how do you do it without messing up the coils below?

Or do you just grasp it and make a vertical bend - is this possible ?

 

WIN_20190120_13_41_13_Pro.jpg

WIN_20190120_13_34_03_Pro.jpg

WIN_20190120_13_35_15_Pro.jpg

WIN_20190120_13_35_41_Pro.jpg

WIN_20190120_13_34_29_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely you agree, bending and unbending lowers fatigue threshold, in simple terms some moleculare bonds in the structure brake, such deformities would be the weaker length of the moleculare chain. In simpler terms you weaken h/s structurally as you bend and unbend, furthuremore you would be shortening the functioning length of the h/s as you raise the overcoil bend. 

A longer stud, if you be willing to consider it, solves the problem you are facing,   without creating new ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rarely see Breguet coils that were not distorted...

You must twist opposite of the highest point, using 2 tweezers: there is a good chance that A is the right place. The stud should not go much lower (maybe a bit) else it may touch the spring "dial up".
The coil in the regulator pins area must be concentric, looks different here.
I also suspect, the whole curve after the knee is a bit too far outwards.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, praezis said:

I rarely see Breguet coils that were not distorted...

You must twist opposite of the highest point, using 2 tweezers: there is a good chance that A is the right place. The stud should not go much lower (maybe a bit) else it may touch the spring "dial up".
The coil in the regulator pins area must be concentric, looks different here.
I also suspect, the whole curve after the knee is a bit too far outwards.

Frank

I find twisting using two tweezers difficult - two pairs of tweezers, enough magnification and light all in the same area!

I can do it with the tweezer tips  on a hard surface, but how do you do it in the middle of the overcoil - tweezers just hovering in the air?

I can do a slight bend down at the elbow as I can just push the tweezer tips outside the last coil.

I agree that the coil does need bending in a bit, and I'll shape it to the regulator pins. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have done a fine job so far, perfectly level nicely concentric . I add the palm of my hand to my tools.

The palm of your hand is equipped with feel and capable of outperforming other surfaces ,  gives you perfect access to the piece, variable angle of attack. takes part in numerous operations ....advantages are too many to mention. All you got to do is accept it as tool and get used to it, it will do wonders. The h/s will be contaminated and would need to take a bath in lighter fluid,  but shaped just as you want it. 

This spring is very easy to work on. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...