Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hello all i have 2 questions about balance assemblies 

1. How do you true a balance wheel, i have a caliper and i have seen videos on how to use them but none of them explain how to make the balance wheel true if you find that it is not. Iam guessing you use the caliper to do this but iam not sure.

2. If you find that a balance wheel has too much end shake, or even too little how do you fix this. I read that for too little you can burnish the pivots but for too much what do you do? can you bend the cock a little bit to make a tighter fit? change the jewels? in DeCarle's book its explaines how to check end shakes but not how to compensate for them.

Posted

In general you just use your fingers to true the balance. There are special tools you see illustrated in books like Fried or Levin show, basically rods with slots in the end that allow twisting split balance arms. I have a few and in 20 years have yet to use one. The balance pivots are safely inside the tips of the truing caliper and the staff is supported on the conical area, and you can use a surprising amount of force on the balance to get it true if needed. The calipers should have a little finger or "thingy" of some sort that you can bring up near the balance rim to use as a visual guide. Many are missing this.

On many watches moving the balance jewels to adjust endshake is simply not possible. If the staff is too long the pivots can be shortened slightly, a jacot tool is good for this, you would use the lantern end of a runner so the pivot is supported by the cone and then touch up the end with a fine degussit or arkansas stone, then refinish it and round it with a small burnisher. Only a very small amount can be taken off, as the cylindrical portion of the pivot can quickly become too short, and the conical portion can bind in the hole jewel.

If the staff is too short, you can bend the cock slightly. You can also do this if the staff is too long. The key word is slightly, and it's more tedious than it sounds as the balance should be removed and the cock screwed to the plate to do it.

What is seen very very often are what one of my teachers called "chicken tracks", which is little pips of raised metal on the plate where the cock seats or on the bottom of the cock itself. A graver or even screwdriver corner is typically used to do this. Depending on where they are done shake can be either increased or decreased, by causing the cock to tilt. "Chicken tracks" is the name because they kind of look like chicken tracks, and because the watchmakers who use this technique are chickens, not doing the job properly.

Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

In general you just use your fingers to true the balance. There are special tools you see illustrated in books like Fried or Levin show, basically rods with slots in the end that allow twisting split balance arms. I have a few and in 20 years have yet to use one. The balance pivots are safely inside the tips of the truing caliper and the staff is supported on the conical area, and you can use a surprising amount of force on the balance to get it true if needed. The calipers should have a little finger or "thingy" of some sort that you can bring up near the balance rim to use as a visual guide. Many are missing this.

On many watches moving the balance jewels to adjust endshake is simply not possible. If the staff is too long the pivots can be shortened slightly, a jacot tool is good for this, you would use the lantern end of a runner so the pivot is supported by the cone and then touch up the end with a fine degussit or arkansas stone, then refinish it and round it with a small burnisher. Only a very small amount can be taken off, as the cylindrical portion of the pivot can quickly become too short, and the conical portion can bind in the hole jewel.

If the staff is too short, you can bend the cock slightly. You can also do this if the staff is too long. The key word is slightly, and it's more tedious than it sounds as the balance should be removed and the cock screwed to the plate to do it.

What is seen very very often are what one of my teachers called "chicken tracks", which is little pips of raised metal on the plate where the cock seats or on the bottom of the cock itself. A graver or even screwdriver corner is typically used to do this. Depending on where they are done shake can be either increased or decreased, by causing the cock to tilt. "Chicken tracks" is the name because they kind of look like chicken tracks, and because the watchmakers who use this technique are chickens, not doing the job properly.

ok so in my case i had the watch working a minute ago after adjust the endstones, but trying to push the crown back i dropped it like an idiot and now it no longer runs in the dial up position, it runs perfect dial down, slows a bit on the sides, then stops as soon as dial goes up. the wheel looks to have a little too much vertical wobble but doesnt seem to hit anything. so i dep think i have too much end shake but could i be looking at a bent pivot now too.

Posted

great just my luck. well iam gunna see if i can straighten the pivots and give them a polish if it doesnt work then luckily i have a spare wheel with a good staff. but the cock does need to be bent because the end shake was too much even when it was running

Posted

My heart sinks when I see marks underneath the balance cock. They are also called “pigs’ ears” sometimes. Very common on anything pre-1960. 

Posted

no sign of pig years. i bent the balance cock a bit and i got it running but may have done it a wee bit too much for now it stops occasionally. i may have to adjust it a bit higher with a shim. at least now i dont have to remove the balance wheel again, because main that is the one thing i hate doing

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...