Jump to content

Date wheel swop for ETA 805.112


Recommended Posts

Got a replacement movement for a dead ETA 805.112 but I the date wheel is aligned differently as on the watch the stem is located at the 12th min position instead of 15th.

 

I plan to swop out the date wheel on the dead movement to the new one.

 

Is this even possible at all? The movement looks very simple with not much access.

 

0dfbfc7c98478130279f869aff7bfb87.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what you are asking. If you mean changing a date wheel that was originally in the 15 mins past window but now is being fitted with the window at the 30 mins past window then no because the numerals will not be facing in the right orientation. Changing the date wheel is not the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that is possible to remove the date disc on this. If you look the plastic is melted over the plate that holds the disc. I would take the coils and circuit and put that on the old movement. Hope that it works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that is possible to remove the date disc on this. If you look the plastic is melted over the plate that holds the disc. I would take the coils and circuit and put that on the old movement. Hope that it works. 


Good idea!

Unfortunately the original was an older version I think that uses a 397 battery while the replacement a 377 so the circuit is different.

I had managed to scrap the melted plastic off the old one and remove the date wheel. Waiting for the weekend to do the “transplant”.

Thank for nudging me in the right direction.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporting back.

It can’t work bcos the date wheel for the old movement looks shallower than the newer 805.112 that runs on 377 battery.

Consolation was that a typo error while searching online for a compatible 805.114 landed me a 805.144 and it’s the same circuit for the 397 so I can just swop out the circuit board.

Awaiting for the movement to arrive to try it out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...