Jump to content

Selecting A Replacement Mainspring


Don

Recommended Posts

I've decided to replace the mainspring in my current project watch and I'm a little confused about the measurements. On the Ranfft movement archive, the mainspring dimensions are given as 1.15 x 10.0 x 0.11 x 320mm. From what I've read, I'm guessing that 1.15 is the width, .11 is the metric strength?, 10 is the Dennison strength? And 320mm is the length. Does this sound accurate?

 

I'm hoping to order from a local supplier who lists mainspring length in inches. If 320mm is the metric length, then I should buy a new spring with a length of 12.5984 inches or less?

 

The closest they carry is listed as:

Metric Width: 1.15 mm, Metric Strength: 0.11 mm, Length in Inches: 10.5
Dennison Width: 2 1/2, Dennison Strength: 10

 

Would this be a suitable replacement? The next size up is longer than the original:

 

Metric Width: 1.15 mm, Metric Strength: 0.11 mm, Length in Inches: 13.5
Dennison Width: 2 1/2, Dennison Strength: 10

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Don,

 

I believe you can use a slightly shorter spring as long as all the other measurements are the same. Only you will have a slightly less reserve. But don't quote me on this one, let's wait for another member(s) who have more experience in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont forget that these measurements are not the whole story.... the end where it grips the arbor should not be too far off...(you can't bend it to close it up but you may be able to stretch it if the arbor is too big).

 

The other end where it locks into the barrel also differs form watch to watch Some lock into the barrel wall, some lock into the top and bottom.... best bring a sample or at least replace from same manufacturer from the same timeframe (eg ETA for ETA).

 

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1 for Anil's advice about the arbour and barrel end. I needed a replacement spring for a wartime Unitas 173 movement. Not only were there two slightly different sized replacements for this movement available from Cousins, but there were 4 different arbour barrel ends to choose from!

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here I thought this was the easy solution. I have no idea how long the existing spring has been in the watch, but it looks pretty good. I was willing to give it a try, but my attempt to hand wind a practice spring was no good. Then I tried a mainspring winder I bought off the Bay. That was a complete disaster. I would love to buy the Bergeon #5355 set, but I haven't found it at a price I can pay right now. Cousins lists the mainspring as obsolete. Jules Borel has it in their database, so I may try ordering it from them. Has anyone tried them before? Their site is possibly more confusing than Ofrei.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've bought brands like Citizen, Seiko, Titoni, Tissot, Roamer. Strange thing is many of them were using ST96 movements. I'm not sure if the ST96 is original to that model or whether it was a replacement movement.  All the watches with nice looking dials were obviously refurbished, after-market dials. And all of them had over-polished watchcases. Some of them had non-original hairsprings, rejewelled pallet forks, watch crystals that don't fit and glued in with a generous amount of glue. One of them was totally not working because the pallet jewel was loose to the point that it almost fell off. But the sellers were very nice. The seller of the non-working watch gave me a complete refund. Some of them gave partial refunds. I would say don't by luxury watches on the internet, regardless of the country the seller is from. Don't believe the "serviced by master watchmaker" statement. Have realistic expectations. ( Do expect the occasional complete junk.) Do expect to do a complete overhaul and major repairs. Otherwise, watches from Mumbai are great. For clocks.... I'm not so sure.
    • In 2020,I picked up an Orient Mako II online. It ran at +15 seconds per day and after 3 years of resets more than weekly, it was time to crack the seal and take a shot at regulating it. Not having a timegrapher, I used a spreadsheet to track the time, referenced the Canadian NRC website, wore the watch between adjustments, and used the back end of some tweezers to lightly tap the regulator daily until it ran to within one second per day.   Two months later, it’s still running to within 1 second per day when measured over a week or longer, while daily variations are up to 9 seconds per day. For my purposes, its overall stability is surprisingly good. Is this method of adjustment “better” than adjusting to 5 positions using a timegrapher, since during the adjustment period the watch is already in the environment in which it’ll be used? Rob in Winnipeg 
    • Nice file  Just got old pocket watch in and tools,  can I get it back together or should I give up.  we'll see  thanks for the info
    • @HectorLooi Yes, I would say that Mumbai has the highest liquidity in terms used watches. How was your experience with these used watches and what watch brands did you buy used? I have always found the vintage luxury watch segment in India a bit shady. Quite a few are genuine watches with genuine matching parts but just not from the same one.
    • Interesting interpretation of "traditional". I would say that Loctite is definitely the up-to-date and appropriate stuff to use, however, it is a relatively modern solution. Before the advent of such esoteric solutions I believe that the "traditional" thread locker of choice may well have been a sugar solution. Once applied the water would evaporate and the sugar would crystalise, locking the threads tight.
×
×
  • Create New...