Jump to content

ff watch parts


Recommended Posts

I was going through a box of watch parts I got a long time ago and found a lot of little plastic packets with paper backing with a logo of a backwards F followed by an F.  I thought they might be Felsa but I looked it up and couldn't find a match to that logo.  Does anyone know what it represents?   Also, I found a few dozen complete balances.  Some gave movement numbers but others had a strange specification that I don't understand.  I'll post about those tomorrow in hopes someone can enlighten me.  They are in my shop in an outbuilding and nobody goes out after dark on my property.  Too many striped kitties.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FF was in fact FHF Fontemelon; thanks Watchmaker for the link.  Here is a picture.  So the next question is how to tell the application.  The one on the right has 59 and 59N.  I think that refers to the movement or caliber.  Is that right?  I have no idea what the 3 3/4 refers to.  I'm guessing the numbers below are part numbers.  The left package seems to identify several models under the number 443.  I have no idea what 443 refers to.

2pack.jpg.c40a8d5ba206e068c8705a92e890b36e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda got tangled up in that last reply so this is a continuation.  Here are more packages.  The F appears to be Felsa.  I'm confused about the ST package.  The table I found online said ST stood for Seth Thomas but when I looked at the history of Seth Thomas, it said they made pocket watches until the '30s and said nothing about wrist watches.  So who is ST?  I have a lot of parts like these from several manufacturers.

3pack.jpg.6841fe181a3c60460ea93917331ea3d7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's start with the main nomenclature on the packets.

Top right is the ligne size and the watch calibre from the manufacturer whose symbol is top left. So 6 3/4 - 60 is saying this belongs to the watch of this size and calibre from FHF. A very good resource for checking out watch movements is ranfft. Here's that movement for example: http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&FHF_60

Next is that, helpfully, movement manufacturers normally use a common reference scheme for parts of a watch. Look here for a useful list: http://www.obsoletewatchandclockparts.com/partsmenu.htm. So a '443' tells you this is a setting lever; a '401' is a winding stem etc.

Onto your second picture then ST is not Seth Thomas but Standard; A is Arogno and F is Felsa. 

So with your newfound knowledge you can say, for example, that the ST piece belongs to a 10 1/2 ligne, 1800 calibre movement from Standard and is the centre wheel. Happy days. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Standard_1800

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watchmaker, you really helped!  That ranfft site is a treasure trove of information!  Also, it appears MrRoundel was right when he said the numbers on the balance containers are the dimensions of the movement.  Apparently they were mostly used on rectangular movements as most of the balances I uncovered do not have them.  Thanks so much!  Dan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...