Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

I need a replacement mainspring for an ETA 2824 - the bridle came off the original when I was re-inserting. Cousins UK have the size as 1.23 x 0.132, Ranfft 1.20 x 0.115, Borel (and General Resorts I think) 1.25 x 0.125. However the original ETA parts listing says 1.23 x 0.125, which agrees with my measurement of the existing spring.

Does anyone know where I might get a spring exactly 1.23 x 0.125? Cousins don't carry one, and none of the listings on Ebay actually state the size. Alternitavely is there any way the bridle can be re-attached? Thanks

Stephen

 

Posted
2 hours ago, chadders1966 said:

Hi

I need a replacement mainspring for an ETA 2824 - the bridle came off the original when I was re-inserting. Cousins UK have the size as 1.23 x 0.132, Ranfft 1.20 x 0.115, Borel (and General Resorts I think) 1.25 x 0.125. However the original ETA parts listing says 1.23 x 0.125, which agrees with my measurement of the existing spring.

Does anyone know where I might get a spring exactly 1.23 x 0.125? Cousins don't carry one, and none of the listings on Ebay actually state the size. Alternitavely is there any way the bridle can be re-attached? Thanks

Stephen

 

I'm in the process of re-assembling a 2824 and had exactly the same problem. I went with the Cousins suggestion (GR 3149X) and it fits fine.

I wouldn't worry about getting an exact match.  Cousins must have sold a lot of these for such a common movement so expect they're selling a suitable spring.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I'm in the process of re-assembling a 2824 and had exactly the same problem. I went with the Cousins suggestion (GR 3149X) and it fits fine.

I wouldn't worry about getting an exact match.  Cousins must have sold a lot of these for such a common movement so expect they're selling a suitable spring.

Hi,

I can see that it probably would work as it is the right height, but a thickness of .132 is quite a bit above .125 - perhaps the description is wrong and it is really .125, any way you could measure it? I'm not entirely sure what the problems of too thick a spring are. Excessive wear? Overbanking? Shorter reserve?

Stephen

Posted
51 minutes ago, chadders1966 said:

Hi,

I can see that it probably would work as it is the right height, but a thickness of .132 is quite a bit above .125 - perhaps the description is wrong and it is really .125, any way you could measure it? I'm not entirely sure what the problems of too thick a spring are. Excessive wear? Overbanking? Shorter reserve?

Stephen

Ranfft has :

2824         1.20 x 11.0 x 0.115mm
2824-1/2  1.25 x 11.0 x 0.125mm

Cousins has the same spring for all 3 variants :   1.23 x .132 x 420 x 10.8 (GR 3149X) 

I can't measure the new mainspring as it's already fitted. The old one measures 1.23 x 0.13 x 420 - same as the Cousins one.

Like you, I was a wary due to the increase in thickness. If the spring is assumed to be a series of beams in bending - from the (very little I remember of structural mechanics) the moment of inertia is bd³/12, where 'd' is the thickness of the spring i.e it varies as thickness cubed. But as the new spring seems to match the old, I'm happy.

(A too powerful spring can result in too high an amplitude and 'knocking' where the balance jewel hits the back of the pallet fork)

Posted
1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

Ranfft has :

2824         1.20 x 11.0 x 0.115mm
2824-1/2  1.25 x 11.0 x 0.125mm

Cousins has the same spring for all 3 variants :   1.23 x .132 x 420 x 10.8 (GR 3149X) 

I can't measure the new mainspring as it's already fitted. The old one measures 1.23 x 0.13 x 420 - same as the Cousins one.

Like you, I was a wary due to the increase in thickness. If the spring is assumed to be a series of beams in bending - from the (very little I remember of structural mechanics) the moment of inertia is bd³/12, where 'd' is the thickness of the spring i.e it varies as thickness cubed. But as the new spring seems to match the old, I'm happy.

(A too powerful spring can result in too high an amplitude and 'knocking' where the balance jewel hits the back of the pallet fork)

The spring I took out matched ETAs specifications exactly, 1.23 x 0.125 x 40. This makes me think it may be an original as I can only seem to find springs that match either the height or thickness, not both.

I was happy to reuse the spring as it was in good condition, but somehow the bridle/attachment that pushes the spring against the barrel came loose and I now have it in two pieces. I have no idea how that happened, or if it can be fixed.

Posted
20 hours ago, chadders1966 said:

The spring I took out matched ETAs specifications exactly, 1.23 x 0.125 x 40. This makes me think it may be an original as I can only seem to find springs that match either the height or thickness, not both.

I was happy to reuse the spring as it was in good condition, but somehow the bridle/attachment that pushes the spring against the barrel came loose and I now have it in two pieces. I have no idea how that happened, or if it can be fixed.

I almost always fit a new spring. I've cleaned and refitted springs that looked fine but I ended up with low amplitude. It was only after re-stripping and examining all the parts again that I discovered fitting a new mainspring solved the problem.

Most of the mainsprings (I usually buy the Cousins generic ones) are rarely a perfect match with all the original specs. I never worry about getting all the measurements identical. As long as width fits the barrel, close enough is usually good enough.

I just fired-up the 2824 I'm assembling and it's showing 295 deg amplitude. Probably increase a bit after 24h but I don't expect the amplitude to get too high. 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...