Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings from Norway [emoji16]
 
I am pretty new to this hobby and my first project is to get an old Omega Ladies watch running again. I.e cleaning and changing the glas.
 
My problem now is that I find it impossible to remove the stem and crown. Can anyone please give me some hints on how to do this?
 
Attached is some pictures of the actual watch and one picture of the movement that I found on the Interweb.
 
 
ad24779d365cdc80b2fbbd9fc63568fc.jpg&key=027baf51bc999ca8cad561adf4b9e94a4641d06a99025d88d06f1210e687b53d
 
7198e01cc23ce91a5e5cdef570e8b236.jpg&key=259dfad47fbc03a1c18a29a598b4befeb69a6e26e1faa0f2557e5b3c3467c5cb
 
 0e3443e30e1a3e819acd2c05af69bcf4.jpg
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted
Try pushing the button remarked while you pull the stem from the crown outwards.ce4b9a8512ad89f9b59d04748636ca43.jpg&key=5c74e61da8af49edb79265bdbf76e4680d43bf5ae5a870b0c091666611f24890

Enviado desde mi SM-N910C mediante Tapatalk





Thank you very much [emoji1303][emoji1303][emoji1303] I had to put the screw back in and then push.


Sent from my Commodore 64
Posted

 

 

Thank you very much [emoji1303][emoji1303][emoji1303] I had to put the screw back in and then push.

 

 

Sent from my Commodore 64

Well, is more of a post, it have no thread, will go straight down, is also the pivot for the setting lever on the dial side. Be careful don't apply too much pressure just enough to make it free the stem.

Best regards.

 

 

Enviado desde mi SM-N910C mediante Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

One last question:

Can anyone tell me the name of this watch?

The serial number is: 12884489. From that I understand that it is produced in 1951.

What I am looking for is a new glass and a new dial.


Sent from my Commodore 64

Posted

I'm going to stick my neck out here. If that is the date of the case then I think the movement is a replacement.

Any good suppler of watch material should be able to help you with a new glass. A genuine Omega glass will have their emblem in the glass on the centre, but I do not know if that applies back in 1951.

 

If you want the dial restored then you need to find a watch dial restorer. It will be very expensive.

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, EtronX said:

One last question:

Can anyone tell me the name of this watch?

The serial number is: 12884489. From that I understand that it is produced in 1951.


 

To find the name or prefix for this model the inside of the case back will tell you more than the serial number ladies Omegas using this movement are as follows :

CK 2787, CK 2873, CK 2524, CK 2927, OT 2929, OJ 11018, BK 2870, CK 10983, OT 2983, CK 2967, OT 2683, OT 2683, OT 3949, CK 2510

The calibre 244 was developed by omega in 1949 but became widely used from 1950 onwards  and was based on the 1938 calibre R13.5 15 jewel with the addition of shock resistance and two extra jewels.

The dial and hands look to be too early for a 1950's watch and as oldhippy as stated it could be a replacement movement as a calibre 244 would be an ideal replacement for a earlier calibre R13.5 

Edited by wls1971
Posted
To find the name or prefix for this model the inside of the case back will tell you more than the serial number ladies Omegas using this movement are as follows :
CK 2787, CK 2873, CK 2524, CK 2927, OT 2929, OJ 11018, BK 2870, CK 10983, OT 2983, CK 2967, OT 2683, OT 2683, OT 3949, CK 2510
The calibre 244 was developed by omega in 1949 but became widely used from 1950 onwards  and was based on the 1938 calibre R13.5 15 jewel with the addition of shock resistance and two extra jewels.
The dial and hands look to be too early for a 1950's watch and as oldhippy as stated it could be a replacement movement as a calibre 244 would be an ideal replacement for a earlier calibre R13.5 



Roger that. Thank you very much for the reply :-)

The name inside the case for this model is 2668-2. I have Googled it and the name that comes up is CK 2668, although I find no information about it. Not even on Omegas homepage.


Sent from my Commodore 64
Posted
I'm going to stick my neck out here. If that is the date of the case then I think the movement is a replacement.
Any good suppler of watch material should be able to help you with a new glass. A genuine Omega glass will have their emblem in the glass on the centre, but I do not know if that applies back in 1951.


 
If you want the dial restored then you need to find a watch dial restorer. It will be very expensive.


Thank you for the reply, oldhippy.

I checked the glass. No emblem on it. I guess I can try to find a domed glass with the same diameter and fit that in.


Sent from my Commodore 64
Posted
Yes that will be fine. As there is, no s/seconds hand a low dome could do the trick.




Time to hit Cousins :-)


Sent from my Commodore 64
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep…This makes perfect sense. With that large a gap in the serial numbers, they were almost certainly machined on different equipment, hence one should have no expectation of any cross-batch compatibility. I’ll revert to the original bridge. Regarding bending the bridge @nevenbekriev, I’ll give it a try, but I may have to buy some better calipers. My Vernier calipers are only accurate to 0.1mm. Not very accurate. 
    • Yes, what I wanted to say is that the cock is part of the main plate, manufactured together with it and not meant to be interchangeable. Even if the other cock gets in place, it is not sure that the balance then will stay upright. You should use the original cock when it exists and is not destroyed. The adjustment needed by bending it is not irreversible. It is minimal deforming that is needed. No tools are needed. I have pointed to all needed references here for the balance staff endshake checking and correctness confirmation. The only tool needed for the correction is You thumb. The cock must be fixed on the main plate, no need of special plate with holes and so on. If You will feel more confident, then measure with Vernier caliper the height of the top of the cock where the stones are against the main plate bottom when the shim is fitted and try to reach the same height when bending the cock (with no balance in place!!!) Caliper with screw for fixing is perfect.    
    • Thanks for the reply. I polished the head of the screw using 1500 to 10000 lapping paper and a screw polisher. This is why I think the head blued and the rest of the screw didn't. Silly question, how do you polish the whole screw inc threads, if that's what it needs to blue? 100% clean, Elna red and heated ultrasonic bath + IPA rinse. Finally, there is definitely heat leak as there's about a 30c difference between the brass bed and the soldering station temp. Having said that, the bed temp was stable. I will try to search out a better brass pot, but I haven't found one yet, hence the stainless steel bowl. 
    • Agreed but that's where WD40 excels, water displacement. 
    • I would change the container to a thick walled brass one to start with. Looking at you screw pictures they don’t look shiny enough, really it’s best to do a black polish on them before trying. Also make sure once polished they are scrupulously clean, I dunk my experiments in acetone before bluing.   i think the thin walled stainless container to leach away the heat from the shavings, most successful bluing videos for example use thick walled brass to hold a good deep amount of shavings which acts as a better holder of heat.   Tom
×
×
  • Create New...