Jump to content

Vintage Citizen 'Bling'


anilv

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Thought I'd share pics of an old Citizen automatic which I got recently.

Its an automatic with the cal. 6501, the serial number starts with 411xxx so its from Nov 1974. Citizen's dating system is slightly different from Seiko's in that the 2nd and 3rd digit denote the month of production, here 11 = November. For Seikos, while the year is indicate by the first digit, only the second digit reflects the month, 0=October, N=November and D=December. You still need to estimate which decade though.

Crown is an original Citizen which is nice and the bracelet is the correct one for the lug width and the bracelet matches the case-shape.

58eee86117928_Citizenbling.thumb.jpg.188fe39f178ac8a0d19daf9d5a31545e.jpg

It has a Rado feel, the dial reminds me of some of the stone dials in the diastar range.

The case is an aluminum one and usually doesn't wear well as it seems to react badly with sweat. There is a black coating which has worn thru in places , the back in particular is pretty worn. I thought of getting it painted on the edges and top where it shows. I won't paint the lower surface as I don't want any paint getting thru my skin, besides, it'll only wear off again.

 

58eee85f7d987_Citizenbling2.thumb.jpg.d1ce9bb7c3d9104b60a61ebcef9ae09d.jpg

 

58eee86272351_Citizenbling4.thumb.jpg.dbf83284c922233d989c8d598961c809.jpg

 

The bezel seems to be stainless steel, I'll be polishing that first, if it comes up ok then I'll paint it. No point painting it if the bezel is all scratched up!

58eee863d3b91_Citizenbling3.thumb.jpg.8a99101773220361310fbd62a33c03f4.jpg

 

Citizen went through a phase where they used a lot of aluminum cases. I have a few but they usually don't last well.

Have a good Easter weekend!

Anilv

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for sharing -I like the dial very much!

This week I also received my first  "blink" vintage from the Seventies which fits very well to your Citizen :-) - therefore I will add it here.  It's a Tissot PR-518. Almost in perfect conditions. Unfortunately the crown is not the original crown. It was replaced by a Tissot crown but the replacement crown does not allow to quick change the day by pressing.

What is somehow funny - the day changes twice within 24 hours. Therefore every day is double. You can see it here: Tissot 2571

I haven't checked yet if there is really Tissot inside - you never know what you get from auctions but it runs very accurate.

Tissot PR-518b.jpg

Tissot PR-518a.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Lantalon,

NiceTissot, I've have a few where the day changed twice, probably a design shortcut!

Anyway that's one good sign that the machinery is original as not many movements have that 'feature'!

I like the bracelet as it matches the watch very well...probably original?

Thanks for sharing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, anilv said:

NiceTissot, I've have a few where the day changed twice, probably a design shortcut!

Anyway that's one good sign that the machinery is original as not many movements have that 'feature'!

Thank you for this information! That's good to know. The bracelet seems to be original - it's very solid. A few links are probably missing, but I still have to remove one link for my wrist.

bracelet.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...