Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Recently, working on a Molnija 3602, which has a push-button stem release, I couldn't get the winding stem back in. The keyless works were in the neutral or "winding" position. Had to strip the hands, the dial and found the clutch-wheel detached from the clutch lever, or the other way around if you like. After several dry-runs I noticed that in order to get the winding stem back in successfully, the keyless works had to be in the "time-setting-position". In this position the clutch-wheel was pushed firmly, and hold in place against the main plate. In the neutral or winding position, any movement to the clutch-wheel, while inserting the stem, caused the clutch-wheel to disengage from the lever. By having the clutch-wheel pushed firmly against the main plate, inserting of the stem didn't cause this disengagement.

Also some main-plates do have a protruding bushing where the tip of the winding stem sits in, but this bushing also centralizes the clutch-wheel in the time-setting-position;

58bd8cf28067e_Keylessenlarged.jpg.a0766d68335f49423095887b14a9f59e.jpg

Working on another watch and speaking to a fellow enthusiast, I was advised to make sure to engage the keyless works in the time-setting-position before pulling the stem. Failure to do so, and the chances were high that I wouldn't be able to get the winding-stem back in, with the obvious consequences of having to remove the hands, dial etc etc.

My question are; are there any advised procedure what's the best & safest ? Pro's & con's? Are there "One size fit all" procedures ??

Please your thoughts and or comments ?

Thanks on beforehand ;)

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Posted

those push button types are prone to that problem,  if you just want to take the mvt. out of the case,  put the stem back in and locked soon as possable.

Posted

Perhaps my questions were confusing? Taking the above observations in consideration, please allow me to rephrase them;

1) is it better to pull a winding stem with the keyless works in the winding (neutral) position?

or

2) Is it better to pull a winding stem with the keyless work in the time-setting position?

or

3) It depends .....

It would be nice to also receive technical support why one way is preferred above the other, or why it "depends"....

Hope to hear ...... ;)

Posted

I'm not answering this question ... just saying it is a very timely one to ask for me too!

If I have a movement where it's a screw to remove the stem then happy days. If it's a movement where it's a push button things aren't always straightforward. I've just worked on an MSR T43 and, like you, had no choice but to remove the hands and dial in order to figure out why things wouldn't seat properly after a simple mainspring replacement. Don't push the button enough you can't get the stem out; push too much and something becomes displaced. Grrr.

So with the general question being what's the fail safe way to deal with push button stems so they can be removed and put back with confidence by not messing something up in the keyless works ... then it's a second from me for any good advice.

Posted

I believe on the ETA movements where the push-piece is in a 'slot' you are supposed to remove the stem when it is in the time-setting position. (ETA 2836 etc).

Anil

Posted

Yup, it depends. Some movements (esp quartz) have a lever with a dimple. This dimple is only visible and pressable when the stem is in the correct position.

Where the stem and keyless works are in good condition, the stem will only come out in the correct position. When there is wear or damage it can be pot luck.

Have I screwed up the keyless works by getting it wrong? Oh yes.

Neil

Posted
  On 3/10/2017 at 5:30 PM, Endeavor said:

@anilv Does your remark suggest we are drifting to the "it depends" answer?

Expand  

Hi Endeavor,

I've had problems with ETA movements ... removing and installing in the handsetting position helps.

Not sure about other movements. On a related note, Miyota autos sometimes do not handwind after setting the time. This is usually because the intermediate winding wheel does not move freely. Pulling the crown to hand setting position and flicking it with your finger to get it back to the neutral position sometimes works.

Anil



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The 3930 is just the reference from GR who make these springs and the X after signifies it's for a auto. So from a google search. 1.45 is the height 7.0 is the size of barrel this will fit from the washer 0.075 is the thickness which is where the strength comes from 240 is the length which equate to running time The critical part is the strength. If you fit a stronger one i.e. 0.085 then the potential is the watch would run faster, especially as these are newer materials. Obviously the height is also significant and you can't fit a higher spring in the barrel, but going down 0.05mm won't make a difference.
    • Andy, thank you again for all your help. You are a true gent. I removed the winding stem in order to pop it into the case so I could play with the movement more easily while the dial and hands were still in place, but it appears the setting lever spring has sprung. So, unfortunately I need to address that before looking at anything else.  If I might be so bold: I presume (given I know what everything else is) that the 3930 is the power rating? How do you know what a suitable rating is for a watch, how do you know 3591 (assuming that's the power) is correct for the Slava 2427? I just know it's 1.5 mm wide, 0.06mm thick (assuming my measurements were correct) and fits in a 7.0mm barrel. The magic art of knowing whether a thicker or less wide spring would be suitable is eluding me, the maths didn't turn out as I thought they would. Again, thank your for all your help thus far. 
    • I've found with Russian watches they don't stick to the Swiss numbering system. The problem with the mainspring is that as this is a dual barrel system they're very small compared to most automatics. If you look on Cousins the weakest 1.45mm high spring is 0.085mm which could be too powerful for this movement and is also designed for a 7.5mm barrel. If you then look at the GR Catalogue and work back from the GR3930X, this is the first auto with correct power rating. Although you'd probably have to go back further to this one to make sure it fits.    
    • Hi all, I’m currently working on an ETA 2836-2 movement. I replaced the pallet fork with a new one (ETA2801710, sourced from CousinsUK). After full reassembly and lubrication, I’ve encountered a strange issue: The movement is fully wound and has power. When I fit the balance assembly, the movement does not tick at all—completely dead. When I remove the balance, the gear train suddenly releases and spins freely, indicating power was present. The pallet fork just “floats” without snapping side to side—almost as if it isn’t even there. No interaction with the escape wheel is visible at that point. However: Before fitting the balance, I checked the pallet fork manually — it was working as it should, clearly interacting with the escape wheel. I’ve inspected the pallet bridge jewel (where the pallet fork sits) and everything looks normal. No signs of misalignment or obstruction. I’ve rechecked everything I can think of and I’m completely out of ideas. Has anyone seen this behaviour before? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! TT
    • Thanks for the prompt response. I apologise for not stating the issue more clearly. The problem is that - what I now know I should have called - the centre wheel is not being turned by the pinion (which is driven by the barrel) with which it shares the arbour (1st photo above). The pinion & arbour are indeed reverse threaded but the arbour (the 'screw') is clearly damaged ('rounded' rather than 'sharp' threads) with swarf evident. When the pinion is screwed on there is only enough connection to prevent the pinion being lifted off but not enough to stop it turning on the arbour. Is a (reversible) repair (threadlocker?) possible in the short term while a replacement centre wheel assembly is sought so that the viability otherwise of the watch can be established?
×
×
  • Create New...