Jump to content

Frequency Question.


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, ftwizard said:

Is that the reason for differing rates? 

Theory says that the higher the frequency, the better the accuracy. But wear and manufacturing difficulty increase also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, ftwizard said:

Is that the reason for differing rates? Do you have a formula for the wheel teeth?

Well, no formula needed. The second wheel should make one revolution per minute :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon: If You count the transmission ratio to the escape wheel the bph can be calculated.

This is just a fictive example: If the escape wheel has per say 10 teeth and the ratio between the escape wheel and second wheel is per say 20, then the escape wheel does 20 revolutions per minute and 200 ticks and tocks. So multiply it by 60 means 12000 bph. Yeah i know weird example :D

Edited by szbalogh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you have two questions the first is the frequent the movement runs at is known as Period of oscillation. Detailed description link found below simple definition physical characteristics of the hairspring and balance wheel.

Second question you can do the gear ratios like everyone said and come up with the rate it's supposed to run out.

As far as I can tell for the most part looking at a balance wheel and hairspring you can't tell what frequency runs at. Then for some high-frequency watches 36,000 some of the stopwatches that run even faster the hairsprings start to get stiff. So when you lift the balance out of the watch the balance wheel barely sags with the hairspring being so stiff. Then basically for anything that looks like a balance wheel of American pocket watch you can assume it runs in 18,000 although a few ran at a lower frequency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_wheel

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you have two questions the first is the frequent the movement runs at is known as Period of oscillation. 

I think that as with everything cyclical, period is actually the inverse of the frequency. Please excuse the nitpick [emoji5]
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will try this weekend.  I've tried several times with my cell phone and it's just too small and recessed to get a good picture.  I need to get my macro lens and tripod out and then figure out how to get enough light down the hole in the side of the man plate to  actually show the top of the broken screw. I appreciate the effort and will try and get that pic this weekend.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hi,   My name is Simeon I am based in Sydney, Australia and have recently got into watch repair / watch making.  I am very much a learner having serviced multiple forgotten watches, some of which were actually successful!   I have a slowly growing collection of watches, mainly old Soviet, a few Japanese and (not pictured) some Raketas, a Poljot Alarm, an Omega Speedmaster Reduced and a vintage (1972) Tissot Seastar.  I like unloved vintage watches, with quirky faces and enjoy bringing them back to life through the simple(!) act of disassembly, clearing and reassembly. I am an Electrical Engineer who also undertook a trade apprenticeship so I am reasonably handy - It's fair to say, I know just enough to get myself in trouble. 
    • ha ha looks like a WMD.....you know I want one now  
    • I took a chance on a non running Cosmotron X8 ("perhaps just needs a new battery" said the advert). Sure enough, I open it up and it has the wrong battery installed (a Renata 344 rather than the correct Renata 386) and the screws holding the battery contact had been sheared off to half a head on both ends. Ho ho, I thought - there's the problem. I got the broken screws out easily enough and as soon as I placed the correct battery in place the balance started. This picked up speed when I reinstalled one side of the battery contact and looked like it was a runner. As I was trying to get the replacement screws in, I did one side but the second was a bit of struggle (hold down the battery contact against its spring while dropping the screw in with tweezers) the balance stopped again. This time it wouldn't start again. 98 percent sure that I didn't stick anything, anywhere important or break it in a mechanical way. The battery was in place for most of the struggling with the contact, so it might have had an intermittent connection which could have upset the electronics. I tried giving it a puff with the blower but the balance doesn't seem to rotate in the normal way, it seems to be held in a static position by magnet. It can be pulled out of this position but spins back and stops dead. This may well be correct for all I know. Anyway, does anyone know anything about these watches and can tell me how I would go about and fault find this? I will be servicing it at some point so should be able to rule out mechanical issues from an old watch but not sure where to start with the electrical part of it.
×
×
  • Create New...