Jump to content

problem with my Titus


ramrod

Recommended Posts

i received a Titus electronic watch the other day. it was advertised as a nonrunner. i got it, put in a battery and it ran. the owner also advertised that it set easily. i'm not sure how he could have done that because the stem was broken at the tip. it wouldn't engage anything that would allow it to set.

anyway, i robbed a stem from another movement and it was up and running again. this time it stopped intermittently. i discovered that the plate in the keyless works that holds the hacking lever and setting mechanism has two screws that turned effortlessly. the threads in the plate are stripped. the screws are fine.

what was happening was that the spring on the hacking lever was overcoming the holding power of the two screws. this allowed the plate to be drawn away from the balance wheel thus causing the hacking lever to start to engage, thus causing the watch to stop. i only discovered the stripped threads after the watch kept stopping.

what i have done in the meantime to keep the watch running is to put threadlocker in the holes along with the screws. that seems to be a fix for the time being.

what i'd like to do is to tap out those screw holes and insert new screws. i could replace the plate (as i've been calling it) with one from another watch, but this plate has inscriptions pertaining to this watch. another plate would say "hamilton" or "gruen" or whatever on it. i'd like to avoid that.

lacking the proper tools to enlarge those holes, it these another solution, possibly? i could always leave the threadlocker in there until or unless it ceases to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone likes pictures, so here you go. Plus, it's easier to see what I'm talking about. the first picture is the movement in question. The second picture shows what two screws I'm talking about as pointed out by my tweezers. The third picture shows two Waltham electronics that could donate the plate in question. The one on the far right is a nonrunner. IMG_20170101_235828397.jpgIMG_20170101_235905329.jpgIMG_20170102_241009040.jpg

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

Edited by ramrod
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many options I can see here...

1. Keep hunting for the "right" part

2. Don't worry about the markings and swap for the good part you have

3. Solder in a bush and drill and tap to the right size

4. Use a slighly oversize screw... which you probably won't need a tap for as long as you run it in bit by bit, back and forth, with some oil

5. Punch the edges of the hole in the plate to close it up slightly as used to be done as a "quick fix" for a worn pivot hole

Personally I would probably start at #4 if you have a selection of screws. If that fails, you can still try #5 then #3 in that order.

If you don't have a tap, then taper the end of a spare screw slightly and file 2 flats on it to make your own.

I'm sure othes will be along shortly with more opinions and ideas!

S

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...