Jump to content

Pocket Watches and Others


Tmuir

Recommended Posts

I promised to post these up a few weeks ago, but have only just got the pictures off the camera.

The first photo is of most of my pocket watches or movements, other than the two in the top row from the left which are workers, all the others are movements I have purchased at different times for me to learn on.

The Waltham is a 15 jewel 16s garde 620 model 1908 for those interested.

The Silver Fusee watch is a English lever hallmarked Chester Assay Office 1888 - 1889 with the makers mark RJP, which going by Jacksons Silver and Gold marks book was most likely R.J. Pike from Coventry.

The rest of the movements are in varying states of disrepair either waiting on me to learn the skills to fix, or were purchased just to practice on.

My 3 non pocket watches worth mentions are in the 4th photo, a 1940s Bulova that is in lovely condition, I think its the Senator model and a genuine trench watch in a silver Dennison case hallmarked Birmingham 1917 - 1918 which needs some TLC and a womens watch in working condition in the trench watch style in a sterling silver case with  London import hallmarks dated 1922 - 1923.

If anyone is interested I can take more photos of any of the other movements

watches1.png

watches3.png

DSC06711.JPG

watches4.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I think Waltham is my favourite brand of pocket watch, maybe because good ones can be had that fall within my price range, or I just haven't seen enough other brands.

The Waltham used to be my every day watch for a number of years as I used to live and work in the outback of Australia in the heat and humidity and I developed a bad allergy to being able to wear any type of wristwatch, so for some time I wore a pocket watch every day until phones got good enough to replace it and then I still wore my pocket watch when I went out and didn't want to carry a phone.

Thankfully I can now wear wristwatches again.

I'm guessing the Hamilton is of similar vintage to the Bulova which is a lovely looking watch, but styles have changed and its too small for me to be able to read the time now without wearing my glasses. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waltham made some excellent movements. My favourite is the Ball-Waltham - one of the first certified railroad grade pocket watches. Essentially, Webb C. Ball had responsibility for ensuring the accuracy of RR grade watches, and Waltham was one of those companies - like Hamilton - that were "certified" by  Ball. I won't bore you with detail ^_^ because you can read all about it here:

http://www.pocketwatchrepair.com/histories/ball.html

Here's my own Ball-Waltham from 1903:

 

Ball_Waltham_Commercial_Standard_1903_face_1.jpg

Ball Waltham Commercial Standard 1903 movement.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice, I don't own any railroad grade watches, but they are on my list to own, I worked for our government railway a number of years back so have a soft spot for railroad items and have a few things around the house and I'm still on the lookout for a WAGR fusee clock, but my budget has never been big enough when one has turned up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walthams are very under valued, certainly in the UK. Sort of nonsense I hear is "Walthams are machine made and mass produced " yet there Swiss or English counterpart are somehow "Handmade " exclusive and of excellence " What utter nonsense! Do these people honestly believe these guys sit at a bench with a block of steel and produce a watch.
Yes Walthams were produced using machine shop methods, in large numbers but even these require a certain amount of " Hand finishing "
I believe a high grade Waltham movement is on par with any other Watch Maker of the period.
My favourite pocket watch (Movement) that I own is a Waltham P S Bartlett 17 jewel made circa 1915.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're absolutely right. Until the Swiss domination of the wristwatch market from the 1950s - followed by the quartz revolution - American watch movememts were some of the best in the world. Elgin, Hamilton, Waltham and others had brought the art of mechanical, hand-wound, machine watch manufacture to a high point.

Will

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...