Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

just received this one in the post, not sure if I have made an expensive mistake, all I know about it is it's a Dulux chronograph, it's missing the crown and was sold as untested. I think it has a Landeron movement but I can't work out how to remove the back and I'm too scared to force it. It has gold markers but rose gold coloured hands except the sub seconds which looks like a blued hand. Not sure what colour the hands are supposed to be. The case is covered in green from the brass strap pins but should come off easily. The good thing is when I give it a little shake the sub seconds ticks for a couple of seconds and the chrono pushers click nicely. The glass is scratched and the chrome isn't brilliant. What do you think? Any info would be appreciated. I won't even attempt to take the movement apart, that would be a very big mistake at the moment. Sorry about the pic I had to use my phone as I can't seem to upload pics on here from the camera. Cheers, Dave.

DSC_0090.JPG

DSC_0091.JPG

Posted

A pic of the back would be nice or it could be a front loader does it have a removable bezel on the front i cant tell from your pic.

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Cad101 said:

A pic of the back would be nice or it could be a front loader does it have a removable bezel on the front i cant tell from your pic.

 

I will take one when I get back from work, it looks like a snap on but there are no recesses or lips, the bezel does look more (roomy). 

Posted

Looks almost definitely a snap back as the case is plated and the back appears to be stainless. The case looks pretty filthy so you may struggle to find the cutout to insert a case knife. If you carefully roll a scalpel blade round the join and look hard with a loupe you will probably find it

 

S

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, StuartBaker104 said:

Looks almost definitely a snap back as the case is plated and the back appears to be stainless. The case looks pretty filthy so you may struggle to find the cutout to insert a case knife. If you carefully roll a scalpel blade round the join and look hard with a loupe you will probably find it

It's gunk from a reaction of the leather strap and the brass? Strap bars.

Sorry about the bad pics.DSC_0097.JPG

Posted

It doesn't look too bad, no rust anyway, It hasn't got a crown so have to figure out how to wind it or work out what size crown to get. I stupidly turned it over and a wheel fell off.

Posted
23 minutes ago, StuartBaker104 said:

I'm going for Landeron 48, although it could be a 54. Can you see a calibre number stamped under the balance wheel?

Looks in a good state. Have you managed to give it a wind yet?

I can't see the number under the balance wheel, I've looked on ranfft archives and it isn't quite the same as the 48, 54 or 248. Did they differ slightly in the same movement at all? 

Posted

It's not a 47. Very different chrono bridge.

Key difference between 48 and 54 is size, but they share many parts.  148 and 248 are later variants of 48.

If you are planning to tackle it yourself, you will need this... http://shop.joseph-watches.com/joseph/members/FMPro?-db=joseph_archive.fp5&-lay=web&-format=esemblo_details.html&kategorie=esemblograf&-recid=12607829&-token=002&-find

 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, StuartBaker104 said:

It's not a 47. Very different chrono bridge.

Key difference between 48 and 54 is size, but they share many parts.  148 and 248 are later variants of 48.

If you are planning to tackle it yourself, you will need this... http://shop.joseph-watches.com/joseph/members/FMPro?-db=joseph_archive.fp5&-lay=web&-format=esemblo_details.html&kategorie=esemblograf&-recid=12607829&-token=002&-find

 

Thank you, I wish I was more clued up on part names and then I could have explained. They only made the 47 in 1937 didn't they? It must just share some of the same parts.

Posted
23 hours ago, StuartBaker104 said:

It's not a 47. Very different chrono bridge.

Key difference between 48 and 54 is size, but they share many parts.  148 and 248 are later variants of 48.

If you are planning to tackle it yourself, you will need this... http://shop.joseph-watches.com/joseph/members/FMPro?-db=joseph_archive.fp5&-lay=web&-format=esemblo_details.html&kategorie=esemblograf&-recid=12607829&-token=002&-find

 

I have now taken the balance out Stuart and there is no calibre number anywhere. 

Posted

Since you've got that far you should be able to measure the movement diameter accurately, and if you remove the hands andial, if the cal number is not marked there you can compare the setting lever parts with the pictures on ranfft to get a match.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
×
×
  • Create New...