Jump to content

Hi from SW UK


turk62

Recommended Posts

I have owned mechanical watches all my life, from a Smiths - a 13th birthday present, thro several 'no-name' Swiss pieces in the pre-quartz days; several Seiko & Citizen daily beaters to a collection now of some 20+!

A recent acquistion was a $40 Seamaster, that had seen better days - but worth the punt. I had expected to get someone like WatchGuy to work on it - but I kept missing the cut. Then I stumbled on you guys, wandered around and thought I'd give it a go myself - what could possibly go wrong?

So, I'm in the process of 'tooling up'and decided that my guinea-pig would be an old Seiko 7S26A that had given up on me. I thought the rotor had broken but I got the back off with the 'duct tape ball' and screwed the rotor back on - what I hadn't realised was that this movement has no manual wind - so of course it wouldn't go!

Anyway, with Mark's videos & Hacko's guides, I'm going to crack on with the teardown/clean/oil/rebuild so wish me luck.

IF all goes well, there's a Hamilton that's losing time and then the Seamaster!!  So,to paraphase Capt. Oates - "I may be some time".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome Turk! Yes, it is a good idea to dissect the Seiko first rather than the Omega or the Hamilton for that matter! :)

By the way, your 7S26A (also version B  ) requires a "Philips" type screwdriver for one of the screws dial side. It is a tiny screw on the "Date Dial Guard". Other than that small difference it is the same as version C we have in the walkthrough section: an excellent one done by Lawson. Version C uses 4 screws of the same type on the guard. Also, the 7S36 is identical version to version but adds one more bridge and one more screw...but that is not your case. I'm including all these particular to broaden your search resources in case you are going deeper into those vintage Seiko movements...since you are working on one. Finally, CousinsUK sells the 7S36 which in a pinch can be swapped for the original 7S26 that way, if you mess anything up, you won't miss your original Seiko.

Cheers,

Bob

PS. Hacko says to build your own special screwdriver for that tiny screw...I went ahead and bought the Seiko screwdriver for that one...it is inexpensive...I figure, part of tooling up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks both - in the case of the 'rogue' philips-head screw, I was intending to 'engineer' a cheapo blade! I can't, for the life of me, think why seiko have such an oddball amongst regular screws. It seems to go against the very nature of japanese mfg. philosophy, ie standardise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings and Salutations!

I went ahead and popped for the darn screwdriver too. The only reason I can think of for that screw is that it is there to support some automation procedure during assembly. 

Edited by dadistic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...maybe it was an afterthought (think recall?) to smooth out the reliability of the mechanism...there is a wheel that actions the date and the day, attached to the plate, next to the screw. I've seen those working without the screw but by having it (regardless of version) it keeps the teeth of the wheels aligned properly... the plate is not rigid enough and with use it might bend a little without the screw. As a result, teeth won't align well with possible damage or unreliable action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • your balance wheel looks interesting in the watch and because it's at an angle it's changing things a little bit. in other words they hairspring is not centered between the regulator pin in the boot and I also noticed your terminal curve is lacking apparently by design? Because if you look in the second image you'll notice yes there's a terminal curve but not as aggressive a one as you normally see on watches at least most watches.   then in all of your images it looks like the boot isn't quite back where it's supposed to be? out of curiosity how did you remove your balance complete and clear the regulator pin? then just in case you weren't aware it rotates out of the way so you can remove the balance complete without bending the pin. Then it's rotated back exactly 90° and yours looks like it's off by just a little bit in the original image and I'm assuming that you just been the pin out of the way? it's always interesting in horology is the variations in the things. Like the image I have above does have a terminal curve but not the most aggressive and yours is even less but that is the way the watch was made. Then the spacing between the regulator pin in the boot should be relatively small basically if you had two pieces of the thickness of your hairspring that's how much space should be there like in this image. But oftentimes watch manufacturers do not necessarily follow the rules  
    • Yep i can see where you're going with that one Rich.  Sooo now that I've frightened the OP into submission 😁. Chief i do apologise for some reason unbeknown to myself I'm in a happy silly mood. So seriously to identify the movement lets have a look at the dial side, learning this part is straightforward, just need a little logic and something called the # BESTFIT BOOKS # . Or the other non American equivalents. 
    • I can definitely see elephant and aardvark and possibly some sort of bird with a large beak 🤣 anyway I'll have a go of getting it flipped over tonight and send some pics
    • A Schild movements often have left handed crown screws. A pic of the keyless works would help identify it, and the size of the movement. Looks like someone has had a, not very subtle, attempt to decrease play in the centre wheel. And the hairspring looks like it needs some work. From the scratches on the bridges, it looks like it was last serviced by a drunken baboon, but it's a good movement to practice on. Good luck 
×
×
  • Create New...